What is the difference between the Philips X1 X2? Are the units the same?

The unit design is essentially the same.

As a X1 user,I think this headset is still worth it now**,Launched as a flagship-level headset when it was launched,**It's 3499,From this point of view,The positioning is higher than HD。 In terms of parameters,X1The impedance is30ohms,Sensitivity100DB,It's easier to drive than 600 and650,In terms of three frequencies,Individuals have compared 650 under C4Direct push,The conclusion is that X1's balance wins,Especially in the transparency of high frequencies and vocal detail performance,It will be better than 650。

The biggest feature of X1 is that the style is very omnivorous,Listen to the voice impartially,It's hard to make a bad sound,No extra dyeing,It can be said that it's very Hifi,That is, the fidelity is very good,If it's a computer、If it's a direct push from a mobile phone,X1 is indeed the best choice。

1.The Philips X1 earphones use a 50mm unit, an open design, and the unit uses neodymium magnet magnets, and the official statement that the unit has been carefully selected and paired to ensure better consistency of the productSennheiser.

HD650 and above level headphones, the official also said that the unit is specially selected and paired.

The speaker opening on the inside of the earcup has a 15-degree tilt angle, which is somewhat similar to the structure of the SHP9000.

The meter can reduce the reflection of sound, and it can also increase [or adjust] the dynamics of low frequencies to a certain extent.

The shell of the earphone is made of special plastic material, which is not only much more delicate on the outside, but also the cavity of the earphone unit.

It is also a lot better than the material on the SHP9000. Connecting with the headphone headframe, the X1 uses a ring-shaped metal bracket outside the headphone unit, and although some weight is added, the whole structure becomes firm when the joints move.

There will also be no "squeak" rubbing sound. These are significant improvements compared to the SHP9000.

4.The Philips X1's high frequencies have good resolution, but they are significantly tighter than the high frequencies of the SHP9000 and A1000, and the sound is a little astringent under MD11+HP11 [Note, yes.

MD11+HP11]. The X1's high and mid high frequencies are better, which makes it sound slightly brighter, and in terms of the upward extension of the high frequencies, the X1 sounds a lot more refined than the A1000, though.

It presents more of a neutral and youthful style, lacking the elegance of SHP9000 and not as open as A1000, compared with HD650, under the same combination of MD11+HP11, HD650

The high frequency is more restrained than that of X1, with a slightly better level of detail and a slightly weaker density.

I'm currently using it, and it's better to sound than the three major pieces, and the requirements for the front end are relatively low. More than a thousand decoders can make a good sound, and the relative investment will be small, so I recommend it. Recently, Philips has been increasing its publicity efforts, and you can apply for a trial.