What about Envision and Mazda CX 4?

Updated on Car 2024-03-16
7 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    About 200,000 joint venture SUVs, Buick Envision is preferred, the entry-level model is almost 200,000 or so landing, the basic configuration is quite complete, the space is also large, the rear floor is relatively flat, there is no obvious bulge in the middle of the rear row, which is a big benefit for three people in the rear row, and there is a panoramic sunroof, and fuel consumption is not high. Although the power band is so large that the American SUV has accelerated from 0 to 100 kilometers in 10 seconds, the acceleration performance in the middle of this car is very good, and the acceleration at 40-80 mph is very fast (I have personally tested it), and I don't feel the power difference when I usually drive. So I think if you have a budget of 200,000 yuan and take the usual route of buying a car, Envision is the best choice.

    <> if you don't take the usual road and like a sporty SUV, we recommend Mazda CX-4, which is a coupe-type SUV with a dynamic appearance, SKYACTIV engine, ** also cheap, the entry model of automatic transmission is about 170,000 on the ground, the top is about 210,000 on the ground, the configuration is very high, and the sub-top is about 190,000 on the ground, the configuration is comparable to Envision, and the top or sub-top is recommended. The ** is more than the budget, so it is not recommended. Of course, because it is a sporty SUV, the body is relatively low, much lower than a regular SUV, and only a little taller than a sedan.

    <>In addition to the above, Tiguan and Kodiak are not recommended, because Kodiak will not be better than Envision, and the Skoda brand is lower than Buick; The Tiguan is no longer the main push, and the Volkswagen mainly promotes the Tiguan L, which also indirectly leads to the Tiguan no longer upgrading but simply matching the Tiguan L to open up the gap, with low configuration, poor interior, and full of plastic feeling that has been miserable today.

    There are many French SUVs to choose from at 200,000, but French car companies have serious losses, and even have the risk of bankruptcy and transfer, and their models are not as good as one to maintain their value, and 200,000 SUVs may have to be replaced better in the future.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The CX-4's interior is stylish with a focus on practicality and texture, without compromising on one over the other, and is designed and laid out with the driver in mind. In terms of materials and configuration, CX-4 also understands what today's young people want, four-way adjustable leather steering wheel, electrically adjustable leather seats, dual-zone independent air conditioning, 7-inch floating central touch screen and other configurations can be found on the configuration list. In addition, many parts of the interior are covered with leather materials, and the touch of the interior, the texture of the knobs and buttons are good.

    As a fairly economical and fun SUV, it is very suitable for young people.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    1. Different models: Ankesaila compact sedan, CX5 is a compact SUV, and although CX4 is classified as a compact SUV, it is actually a model between a sedan and an SUV in the strict sense.

    2. Manufacturer workmanship: Ankesaila and CX5 are produced by Changan Mazda, and CX4 is produced by FAW Mazda. The nickname of Changma Tractor Factory is not in vain, and it is obvious from the interior that Anghe CX5 is a little rougher.

    Of course, it is not clear whether the engine, chassis, gearbox and other large parts of the long horse will be rougher, resulting in a high repair rate. Due to the fact that the sales of Changma are a lot ahead, it is impossible to conclude that the quality of Changma must be bad after many complaints about Changma's repair.

    3. Model pedigree: Ankesaila and CX5 are global models; The CX4 is a special model in China, and it is said that it is a re-skinned design of the CX5 chassis. In China, it is not uncommon for special models to be supplied, the most famous is Lavida, including Xinyinglang, Lingpai, Jed, Forrest, etc.

    The biggest controversy about the new model of the special car is that there is no international safety crash result as a reference. Of course, this is also the opinion of the benevolent and the wise.

    4. Model differences: The chassis, gearbox, and engine of these three cars are the same, and the biggest difference is in the model, which is embodied in the space. The rear row of Ankesaila is small, CX5 is the largest, and the space of CX4 is smaller than CX5, but it is larger than that of Ankesaila, but the driving and riding space may not be much larger than compact cars of the same level such as Civic and Corolla, so the question is, sex.

    5. Cost-effective: I went to ask about the preferential range of these cars a few months ago, and the discount is about 1W+, starting from 12W+, CX4 has no discount, landing from 17W, CX5 discount is about 2W, and landing is 18W.

    The result is very simple, if you don't have enough meters and don't care too much about the practicality of space, buy Ankesaila, buy CX5 if you don't care about the practicality of space, and buy CX4 if you don't care too much about the practicality of space. The problem is that "there are enough meters and don't care too much about space" customers, after all, there are not too many, which can be seen from the market performance.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Compared to the Mazda CX-5 and Encore, the only reason I recommend EnCore is that it gives you a higher visual experience with a lower **. Its key word is luxury, so apart from this one, the car is inferior to Mazda's CX-5 in other aspects.

    Mazda CX-5 or Encore, which car is better is more worth buying.

    1.Comprehensive aspects.

    Compared to Envision here, the CX-5 is better than Envision in handling and power, and cheaper in maintenance and repair, except for the visual lack of atmosphere.

    2.Performance. The CX-5 is equipped with a rough four-wheel drive system, while the Envision does not. The automatic transmission used by Mazda on the transmission is better than the Envision dual-clutch stability. Not only that, but he also has a large central display and our leather seats.

    3.Appear. Enwei has a high appearance and looks simple and atmospheric.

    Envision is said to sell interiors. Indeed, the interior is exquisitely crafted and cost-effective. The Mazda CX-5 has no appearance to speak of, the sitting position is very high and comfortable, and it feels like the other mountains look short under the sky.

    Four-wheel drive is very stable in rain and snow, and the trunk is very empty.

    Summary: If you compare these two models, if you don't care too much about the luxury of the car to others, I still recommend the CX-5. If you don't compare**, I even recommend Envision, which is powerful, luxurious, and has reliable transmission.

    Millions of car purchase subsidies.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Hello, Envision is 3-40,000 yuan, regardless of **, Envision is better. Engine configuration is the key to measuring the dynamic performance of a car. Mazda CX5 is equipped with a naturally aspirated engine with a maximum power of 144kW and maximum torque, and Envision is equipped with a turbocharged engine with a maximum power of 124kW and maximum torque.

    To know which is better, Mazda CX5 or Rang Bounce Buick Envision, we can compare the body size of the two models. The Mazda CX5 is positioned as a compact SUV with a body size of 4,555 * 1,842 * 1,685 mm and a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Envision is positioned as a medium-sized SUV with a body size of 4694*1839*1686mm and a wheelbase of 2750mm.

    It can be seen that Envision has more space. After a comprehensive comparison, the differences between the two models are mainly in terms of power performance, space size, and **. It can be seen that Envision is a good choice.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The quality of Mazda CX one 4 is not bad, but its shortcomings:

    1. Small space, Mazda CX4 is the current mainstream model - compact SUV, if the body layout of such a model is not good enough, the internal space of Yuqi will be very small, and Mazda CX4 has such a problem, its internal space is very small, sitting a few tall men will look cramped, which is also one of the main problems criticized by car owners;

    2. The shock absorption is not done well, the positioning of Mazda CX4 is a coupe model, so it has put a lot of effort into the chassis to ensure that its off-road and driving feeling will be better, which is very suitable for young people to drive out to play in Haitian and Haiti, and it is a sports model. This also leads to its shock absorption and suspension is very stiff, and the shock resistance effect is poor, so the comfort is greatly reduced, and the typical carelessness is lost;

    3. The body is light and thin, which is a common problem of many Japanese cars, they generally in order to reduce fuel consumption to create fuel-efficient models The selling point is to make the body lines smoother, so the body materials are mainly sheet metal, and the paint is very little, the overall flashy and unrealistic can not stand up to the exquisite, and Mazda CX4 also has the problem of Zhen Bangling, the body is light and thin, the paint is easy to be scraped off, and it looks not beautiful and feels safe;

    4. The abnormal noise is serious, and the sound insulation problem is a pain point for many Japanese cars, even the Civic can't escape, and the same is true for Mazda CX4, its sound insulation is very bad, and the abnormal noise in the car is serious. I don't feel it when driving at low speed, but after getting on the highway, there is no way to ignore the noise in the car, which also makes it unbearable for many car owners.

    Millions of car purchase subsidies.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The Mazda CX-4 is positioned as a compact coupe SUV with intelligent all-wheel drive and a Skyactiv blue sky engine, which is worth buying.

    The Mazda CX-4 basically retains the exterior design of the Koeru Etsu Concept, and the front face adopts a bionic design. The design concept of "soul of motion" is still adopted, and the front face adopts a shield-shaped grille, and the wingspan chrome trim strip is integrated with the headlight cluster, and the shape is extremely dynamic and smooth. The chrome trim echoes the shape of the headlights and has a certain three-dimensional effect.

    The length, width and height of the Mazda CX-4 are 4633 1840 and 1535 mm, respectively, and the wheelbase reaches 2700 mm. The dimensions are basically the same as those of the concept car, and the wheelbase is the same as that of the CX-5, but the height is reduced by 175 mm.

    In terms of power, the Mazda CX-4 will be offered with two "Skyactiv" engines for consumers to choose from, of which the maximum output of the engine is 116 kW, and the maximum power of the engine is 141 kW, and the transmission part is mated to a 6-speed automatic manual transmission.

Related questions
21 answers2024-03-16

There is basically no difference between the ** and configuration of the two cars, which is analyzed from the following five aspects: >>>More

16 answers2024-03-16

As for the power of the Buickon Flag, I feel that it is very correct, and this car can meet our pursuit of power. The highlight is in the performance of the Buick Encore transmission, which greatly improves the handling, fuel consumption and comfort of the Encore Banner, bringing a smoother dynamic experience.

15 answers2024-03-16

My dad is the owner of the Roewe 750e, and he has been buying the car for more than half a year, and his daily driving is still relatively stable. The engine performance is good, the acceleration is relatively fast, it is easy to start and stop in the downtown area, and the engine sound when accelerating is also very beautiful. The interior space is relatively large, but not as big as the Accord, a Japanese car. >>>More

7 answers2024-03-16

Buick Regal has good power, complete control configuration, rich safety configuration, rich interior configuration, good cost performance, ** model complaints about water ingress in the headlights have been reported by some customers, but the gearbox performance is quite stable, it is recommended to choose according to the actual car. Regarding fuel consumption, from the point of view provided by netizens, the average fuel consumption is about. >>>More

18 answers2024-03-16

Selected as one of the top ten brands of ceramics in 2010, authentic Guangdong bricks, flatness, density and brightness are good, cost-effective or very high, the color is also novel and unique, is a good choice.