How did the T34 heavy tank perform?

Updated on military 2024-03-07
23 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    As soon as it comes to it"t-34"Do you subconsciously think of the Soviet Union's medium tank, but today I don't want to talk about the Soviet T34 medium tank, so how can the topic say that the T-34 is a heavy tank, but I think about it carefully, it turns out that the United States has a tank also called "T-34", and the weight is as high as 65 tons, which already meets the standards of heavy tanks, but this tank. It is an experimental tank of the United States, which has not been mass-produced and equipped on a large scale, if you have not played World of Tanks.

    It is estimated that not many people know this product. <>

    At the beginning of 1945, in order to further enhance the firepower of tanks, the U.S. Ordnance Bureau also learned from the Germans to change the 120-mm anti-aircraft gun to a tank gun, that is, the T53. The Bureau of Ordnance required it to be better than the 105 mm T5E1 or 155 mm T7 tank guns. The muzzle velocity of this gun should reach 966 meters per second when firing ordinary shells, and high-speed armor-piercing shells should be fired.

    to reach 1258 meters per second. T34 heavy tank.

    for the United States during World War II.

    The T34 was similar in appearance to the T29 and T30, but because the barrel was too long, a 100 mm thick steel plate was welded to the rear of the turret for trimming, which also played a role in strengthening the defense.

    As for its performance, since this tank is not mass-produced, it is only tested as a test car, so there is no record in history to compare, as for the game, I feel that the feel of the blood bar world is not very reliable, and I don't go to the American system of magic thunder, and I don't know if there is such a product, so I really can't evaluate it. But first, let's take a look at its basic stats:

    Engine power: 810 hp.

    Maximum speed: 35 km/h.

    body armor, front: 102 mm; Both sides: 76 mm; Rear: 51 mm.

    The main ** uses a 120 mm main gun. <>

    If we compare the Tiger with it, the armor on the head is the same thickness, but the maximum speed is slightly inferior to that of the German Tiger tank.

    After all, the weight is so much larger, so it can basically be considered as a benchmark against the German Tiger tank, but whether it can be beaten, I may put a big question mark on this, because in my opinion, unless it is a numerical advantage, it is difficult to surpass the Tiger tank. <>

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The performance of the T34 heavy tank is very good, in that era, the T34 heavy tank was considered a top tank, whether it is the best vitality or the thickness of the armor, it is very good, and it has repeatedly made meritorious contributions in the war.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The T34 is a medium tank, not a heavy one. In World War II, the T34 tank was the iconic army equipment of the former Soviet Union, and it was the most equipped tank in the Soviet Union at that time, achieving a perfect balance in firepower, mobility, and protection, and made great contributions to the Soviet Union's victory over Germany, and its design ideas also influenced the design of many tanks after the war.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Extremely high performance. The T34 is simple to make, the operating system is similar to that of a tractor, it is particularly easy to operate, fast and has a low failure rate.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Engine power of the T34 heavy tank: 810 hp, maximum speed: 35 km/h, body armor front: 102 mm, sides: 76 mm; Rear: 51 mm.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Heavy tanks have superior performance, powerful firepower, and thick armor, but they are slow to travel and do not have strong passability.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The third is that the performance of the heavy tank is relatively stable, and his speed is very stable.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The head is not as thick as 29, the speed is not as good as 29, the head and depression angle are about the same, but the penetration depth and rate of fire are good.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The 34 was a medium tank produced in the Soviet Union from the 1940s to the 1950s and was considered the best tank of the Second World War.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Very happy question, the performance of the tank is very good, it is very strong in its actual combat.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The nail is too thin, the rest is fine.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Good stuff made in the wrong place at the wrong time.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    The T30 with 120 guns went to the eighth-level room and made up for it by himself.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    There's a bunch of neuroses down there.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    T34 heavy tank.

    At the beginning of 1945, in order to further enhance the tank firepower, the U.S. Ordnance Bureau changed the 120-mm anti-aircraft gun to a tank gun, that is, the T53. The Ordnance Bureau required that its armor-piercing ability must be stronger than that of a 105-mm T5E1 or 155-mm T7 tank gun, and that the muzzle velocity of the muzzle should reach 966 m-s when firing ordinary shells and 1,258 m-s when firing high-speed armor-piercing shells.

    The T34 heavy tank is a heavy test tank developed by the United States during World War II, the T34 is similar in appearance to the T29 and T30, but due to the long barrel, a 100 mm thick steel plate is welded to the rear of the turret for trimming.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    First of all, both tanks are symbols of the victory of their respective sides. The T34 is the world's first oblique armored tank, and its overall structure is trapezoidal when viewed from the front, which can easily cause shells and anti-tank shells to bounce off when attacked by the enemy, increasing the survivability of the battlefield. In addition, the cost is low, the process is simple, the operation is convenient, and the maintenance is convenient.

    Although a large number of armored vehicles were lost in the early days of the war, more T34s were poured out by the Soviet army overnight, in fact, a large number of them were logistical repairs and factory production, and some tanks even came off the assembly line, equipped with ammunition, and directly drove to the front line by the workers' reserves. But the disadvantage was the lack of firepower, which was replaced by the Soviet IS series heavy and super heavy tanks in the late World War II!

    The Tiger tank was originally designed to weigh 45 tons, and the thickness of the front armor was 80 mm. But Hitler, who was dazed by the T-34 and KB tanks, did not feel enough and ordered it to be raised to 110 mm. As a result, the weight reached 56 tons.

    The Tiger tank was mounted with a powerful 88 mm tank gun. However, because the cannon is too heavy and there is no hydraulic assist system, the gunner needs to shake 720 times to make the cannon rotate once, so its reaction speed is very slow. The Tiger tank can be described as the most powerful armored vehicle in World War II, and a single gun can penetrate armored vehicles including T34 (Soviet), M4 Sherman (United States), Crusader (British) and so on.

    It became a steel monster feared by the Allied armored forces in World War II, but its armor protection, especially the engine back cover, and side armor were weak, and the engine power was too poor, and even some Tiger armored car crews themselves complained that the horsepower was too poor, and often stalled because the engine could not be dragged.

    The battle between the two vehicles was in the Battle of Kursk, in which the Tiger tank showed high power in the early days of the war, but before the war, the Soviet intelligence department fully mastered the new German army's first-class secrets, including the Tiger tank, the Leopard tank, and the Elephant self-propelled artillery. The T34 tank took full advantage of its high mobility and numerical superiority in the ensuing battle. Fight against the Tiger Style.

    Even the brave Soviet driver directly used his speed to crash into the side of the Tiger with T34 at high speed, jamming its position or even knocking it over directly. Infantry stepped forward and attacked the hood and sides with anti-tank grenades, or captured the Tiger driver.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    In terms of quality alone, the Leopard is several notches stronger than the T-34.

    In terms of quantity, it is completely lost.

    The Leopard tank adheres to the characteristics of the Germans, the structure is complex, the maintenance is inconvenient, but the protection is excellent, the chassis reliability is high (except for the engine), the firepower is fierce, the 75mm KWK42 L70 gun, the 70 times the caliber barrel, the armor-piercing ability is strong, the protection ability is outstanding, the front armor can reach 80mm 60 degrees of inclination, the probability of ricochet is greatly increased, the Soviets once took a captured Leopard to do shooting experiments, and as a result, the T-34-76 shells hit more than 60 rounds, Only one shot hit the weld point of the chassis to cause penetration, and the rest all ricocheted, which shows the strength of the protection.

    In contrast, the structure of the T-34 is simple, convenient to manufacture in large quantities, and it is quite easy to drive, it is said that you can drive a tractor You can drive a tank The German tank is much more complicated to drive, because the gearbox is too complicated, and there are too many gears, so the T-34 structure is quite simple, and it is easy to maintain, and the reliability is very high, but the protection and firepower are not as good as the Leopard tank, although it can cause ricochets after being hit, but after all, the armor is weak, and the consequences of the destruction of the car are basically inevitable when encountering the Tiger 88mm gun, But the advantage lies in the fact that it can produce in large quantities Facts have also proved that more people is more power

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The T34 and the Leopard have a different design concept. Therefore, the cost of the two at that time was also different. The T34 is only a fraction of the cost of the Leopard.

    Therefore, after the T34 is produced, as long as you destroy a Leopard, it is worth the price. And the Leopard has to destroy a few T34s before you can show its value.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    The Leopard is much stronger, it is not a product of the era, it cannot be compared, a Leopard tank can be worth 20 T34s

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Leopard WWII also has this model! It's the only Tiger tank class!

    It's an era!

    In the era of World War II, the Leopard was stronger than the T34!

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    The Leopard is indeed much stronger than the T34, the Leopard, like the German heavy tank, attaches great importance to protection, is much heavier than the T34, and the armor defense far exceeds the T34, and the general anti-tank fire of the Allies can hardly pose a threat to the frontal armor of the Leopard. Secondly, the Leopard firepower is also very powerful, the power of the long-barreled 75-mm gun not only exceeds the T34's early 76-mm gun, but the power of the tank is almost the same as the T34's 85-mm short-barreled gun, and even stronger, with higher accuracy, the only obvious deficiency is that the mobility is average, and it is a gasoline engine, which is easy **. Although in the Soviet-German battlefield it was ultimately a great victory for the Soviet armored forces, it was based on the unlimited number of equipment and resource superiority of the Soviets in the war of attrition, which was also the reason why the Germans were bound to lose the war against the Soviet Union.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    They are a product of the times, T34 is the second Soviet Union in World War II equipped and produced the largest number of tanks, more than 50,000 volume, at that time the guiding ideology of the Soviet Army is to facilitate large-scale maintenance and production, so the quality of T34 is not very good. Germany is different, paying attention to quality and precision, so the leopard tank is very successful in every aspect, the only bad is that it cannot be mass-produced, and maintenance is troublesome. The Soviet army often used 5 medium T34 to fight a Leopard.

    The upstairs statement of 1 to 20 is inaccurate, it should be 1 to 5. There is no doubt that the German Leopard and Tiger were the best tanks of World War II.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    The Leopard tank is much better than the T34, although both have beveled armor But the firepower of the Leopard is much higher than that of the T34, and the later T34 85, but the mobility of the Leopard is poor, usually in tank battles, the T34 loses a lot, and the Leopard only loses a few vehicles. The T34 of the Soviet army won only by numbers. But in the winter of the USSR, the maneuverability of the T34 came into play, and it lived up to the nickname of the king of the snow.

    In short, if you want to win tank battles, choose the Leopard, and if you want to win the war, choose the T34. Note: The t in t34 is read in Russian.

Related questions
12 answers2024-03-07

The T-34 can responsibly tell you that it is the worst medium tank in its class, and I don't think there is any need to deliberately play. >>>More

8 answers2024-03-07

Both have their advantages, but it is difficult to say which one is stronger, for example, during World War II, the Soviets considered Sherman to be garbage, and the Soviets assigned all the U.S. aid Sherman to the secondary force, but the Korean War and the First Middle East War proved that Sherman could be compared to T34. >>>More