What is the difference between a company s shareholding of 51 and 67?

The difference between a company's 51% and 67% shareholding is not very significant. Both 51% and 67% of the shares are holdings, however, holding more than 50% of the shares is relative holdings, and holding more than 67% of the shares is absolute holdings. Holding 51% of the shares can not achieve absolute control of the company, and the voting on major matters still needs to seek the opinions of other shareholders, but holding 67% of the shares can achieve absolute control, and any matter of the company can be decided in a word.

In accordance with the Company Law of the People's Republic of China.

stipulates that the shareholders' meeting shall implement a "simple majority" when voting on general matters, and a majority of the shares can be voted on. However, Article 43 of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that: "Except as provided in this Law, the manner of deliberation and voting procedures of the shareholders' meeting shall be governed by the articles of association of the company."

Stipulate. The shareholders' meeting makes amendments to the articles of association and increases or decreases the registered capital.

and resolutions on the merger, division, dissolution or change of the form of the company must be passed by shareholders representing more than two-thirds of the voting rights". That is to say, matters of particular importance to be voted on by the shareholders' meeting, such as capital increase, capital reduction, merger, division, dissolution, amendment of the company's articles of association, etc., must be approved by shareholders holding more than 2 3 shares, that is, 67% of the proportion. To sum up, holding 51% of the shares can not achieve absolute control over the company, and the voting on major matters still needs to seek the opinions of other shareholders, but holding 67% of the shares can achieve absolute control, and any matter of the company can be decided in a word.

Absolute control applies to both the shareholders' meeting of a limited liability company and the shareholders' meeting of a share.

In comparison, the general meeting of shareholders requires more than two-thirds of the voting rights present at the meeting, and does not require that the shareholders of the shares must account for more than two-thirds. Two-thirds contains this number, that is, the absolute control line is 67% is not exact, and two-thirds can also be67% etc.

Extended Materials. Article 216 of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China provides the following meanings for relevant terms: 1. Senior management refers to the manager, deputy manager, financial person in charge of the company, and listed companies.

The secretary of the board of directors and other persons specified in the articles of association. 2. Controlling shareholder.

refers to a shareholder whose capital contribution accounts for more than 50% of the total capital of a limited liability company or whose shares account for more than 50% of the total share capital of the company; Shareholders whose capital contribution or shareholding ratio is less than 50%, but whose voting rights are sufficient to have a significant impact on the resolutions of the shareholders' meeting or shareholders' general meeting according to the amount of their capital contribution or the shares they hold. 3. The actual controller refers to a person who is not a shareholder of the company, but can actually control the company's behavior through investment relations, agreements or other arrangements. 4. Affiliation.

It refers to the direct or indirect control of the controlling shareholders, actual controllers, directors, supervisors, and senior managers of the company.

and other relationships that may lead to a transfer of interests in the company. However, state-controlled enterprises are not only related to each other because they are also controlled by the state.

67% of the shares have a larger absolute controlling stake. 51% is the bottom line of the two joint venture holdings, and 67% is absolute holding. For example, some resolutions require more than two-thirds of all shareholders to vote in favor before they can be passed, so the number of shares held by an individual should be greater than or equal to two-thirds (i.e. 67%) in order to have absolute control.

Proportion of absolute holdings:

1. Absolute control means that in the total paid-in capital of the enterprise, the proportion of the paid-in capital (share capital) owned by the investors of a certain economic component to the total paid-in capital (share capital) of the enterprise is greater than 50%.

2. Although this absolute holding model can enhance management and supervision, it will also have a negative impact on the improvement of the company's performance.

3. Theoretically speaking, in order to achieve full control over other companies, the holding company must hold an absolute majority of the shares of the controlled company, such as more than 51%, strictly speaking, it should be more than 2 3 or 3 4, so as to ensure that the holding company (parent company) is in an absolute dominant position when voting at the general meeting of shareholders of the holding company (subsidiary), and to ensure that the proposals (including general resolutions and special resolutions) that meet the wishes of the parent company can be successfully passed.

4. However, due to the development of equity decentralization and socialization, in fact, the holding company's shareholding in the subsidiary does not have to be so high, and the general shareholding ratio reaches 30% to 40%, or even lower, to achieve the purpose of holding.

The difference lies in the voting rights of some company resolutions, such as the resolution of the general meeting of shareholders, some resolutions require the consent of holding more than half of the share quota to take effect, while holding 51% of the shares (because 51% is exchanged for more than one-half) can reach the voting shares, and some require the consent of holding more than two-thirds of the share quota to take effect, and holding 67% of the shares (because 67% is more than two-thirds of the shares) can reach the voting shares, so no matter what the resolution, as long as the 67% shareholding is the one** Dongtou votes can be passed, but the shareholders holding 51% of the shares, in some resolutions, need to add their own support to obtain at least the remaining shares of other shareholders to pass a certain resolution, but the shareholders are suspicious of each other and look after their own interests, and the shareholders holding 51% of the shares in some resolutions that require more than two-thirds of the shares, to obtain the support of other shareholders, so in order to be able to reach a certain resolution without being constrained, the best solution for shareholders is to hold 67% or more of the company's shares, so hold 51% of the shares The difference with 67% is not in the shares, but in the voting rights of the resolution, and the reference content is the link to the website of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China.

Article 103, there is a situation in which the shareholding company holds its own company shares, for example, if company A holds the corporate shares of company A, the corporate shares cannot be used as voting shares, it is the shares of company A itself, not the shares of any company, and any shareholder has no right to use them even if they are major shareholders, otherwise it is illegal.

<> the difference between 51% and 67% of the company's shareholding is shown in the figure above, if 15 you 12 still 38 want 16 system 8 system 15 learn equity design, company top-level structure, employee equity incentives, the middle number can find teachers.

Summary. 1. The controlling stake is different: 67% is an absolute controlling stake, which can be said to have 100% of the power, while 51% has relative control.

In order to achieve full control over other companies, the holding company must hold an absolute majority of the shares of the controlled company. Only in this way can the holding company be in an absolute dominant position when voting at the general meeting of shareholders and ensure that the proposal can be passed smoothly. 2. The shares are different:

Holding 51% is less than 67% of the shares. 3. Different returns: 51% of the holdings are less than 67% of the income.

The difference between holding 51% and 67%.

Hello. 1.Holding 51% of the company's affairs cannot achieve absolute control over the company's affairs, and the opinions of other shareholders must be solicited for voting on the company's major matters.

However, holding 67% of the company can achieve absolute control over the company, and any matter of the company can be decided with a single word. 2.The 51% of the implicit shares are less than the 67% shares.

3.Holding 51% relative to 67% earnings are less open.

1. The controlling stake is different: 67% is the absolute controlling stake, which can be said to have 100% of the mountain reserve power, while 51% has the relative control of the sedan chair. In order to achieve full control over other companies, the holding company must hold an absolute majority of the shares of the controlled company.

Only in this way can the holding company be in an absolute dominant position when voting at the general meeting of shareholders and ensure that the proposal can be passed smoothly. 2. The shares are different: the holding of 51% is less than the 67% shares.

3. Different returns: 51% of the holdings are less than 67% of the income.

67% of the shares have large absolute control, 51% is the bottom line of the two joint ventures, and 67% is absolute control.

For example, some resolutions can only be passed if more than two-thirds of all shareholders vote in favor. Therefore, for absolute control, the number of shares held by an individual should be greater than or equal to two-thirds (i.e. 67%). Absolute shareholding ratio:

1.Absolute control refers to the paid-in capital (share capital) owned by investors in a certain economic sector accounting for more than 50% of the total paid-in capital (share capital) of the enterprise.

2.Although this absolute holding model can strengthen management and supervision, it will also have a negative impact on the improvement of the company's performance.

3.Theoretically, in order for a holding company to achieve full control over other companies, it must hold an absolute majority stake in the controlled company. For example, more than 51%, strictly speaking, it should be 2 3 or 3 4 or more, so as to ensure that the holding company (parent company) is in an absolutely dominant position when voting at the general meeting of shareholders of the holding company (subsidiary), and the proposals (including general resolutions and special resolutions) that meet the wishes of the parent company can be passed smoothly.

4.However, due to the development of shareholding decentralization and socialization, in fact, the holding company's shareholding in the subsidiary does not have to be so high. Generally, the shareholding ratio can reach 30% to 40%, or even lower, so as to achieve the purpose of holding shares.

Extended information: 1. Holding refers to holding a certain number of shares to control the company's business. A company that controls a company by holding a certain number of shares in the company. Holding companies are divided into pure holding companies and mixed holding companies according to the holding method.

A pure holding company is not directly engaged in production and operation business, but conducts capital operation by holding shares in other companies.

2. In addition to capital operation through holding, the mixed holding company is also engaged in some production and operation businesses. The controlling shareholder refers to the shareholder whose capital contribution accounts for more than 50% of the total capital of the limited liability company or whose shares account for more than 50% of the total capital of the company; Shareholders who have contributed capital or hold less than 50% of the shares, but the voting rights enjoyed by their capital contribution or shareholding are sufficient to have a significant impact on the resolutions of the shareholders' meeting or the general meeting of shareholders. The institution holds more than 50% of the shares or is sufficient to control the business activities of the joint-stock company.

1. The controlling stake is different: 67% is the absolute controlling stake, but the chain can be said to have 100% of the power, and 51% has relative control. In order to achieve complete control over other companies.

2. Different shares: holding 51% is less than 67% of the shares.

3. The income of the acquisition is different: the income of holding 51% is less than that of 67%.

1. The controlling stake is different: 67% is the absolute controlling interest, but it is said that the company has 100% of the power, and 51% has relative control. In order to achieve full control over other companies, the number of chains is on the mainland.

2. Bi Cheng shares are different: the holding of 51% is less than 67% of the shares.

3. Different returns: 51% of the holdings are less than 67% of the income.

Summary. Hello, the difference between 51% equity and 67% equity is as follows: 1, the controlling stake is different, 67% is the absolute controlling stake and has 100% of the power, while 51% has relative control.

2. Different shares: holding 51% is less than 67% of the shares 3, and the income is different: holding 51% is less than 67%.

The difference between 51% equity and 67% equity.

Hello, the difference between 51% equity and 67% equity is as follows: 1. The controlling stake is different, 67% is the absolute controlling stake, with 100% of the power of the socks family, while 51% has relative control. 2. The shares are different:

Holding 51% is less than 67% of the shares3, and the return of the nuclear macro is different: the income of holding 51% is less than that of 67%. <>

Please note that the holding company must hold an absolute majority of the shares of the holding company. Only in this way can the holding company be in an absolute dominant position when voting at the general meeting of shareholders, and ensure that the proposal can be successfully passed. Brother Spine.

Hello, according to Article 27 of the Company Law, shareholders can make capital contributions in currency, or use non-monetary property that can be valued in monetary valuation and can be transferred in accordance with the law, such as physical objects, intellectual property rights, land use rights, etc., except for the property that laws and administrative regulations stipulate that auction shall not be used as capital contribution. <>