In terms of the performance of the car alone, regardless of the driving technology, which is better

Germany** test of Mitsubishi LAN EVO 9 and Subaru Impreza WRX STI9: (best score in red).

lan evo wrx sti

Engine Straight 4turbo Straight 4turbo

Bore x stroke mm

Engine compression ratio: 1:1

Turbo value.

Maximum power ps rpm 280 6500 280 5600

Maximum torque Nm rpm 400 4500 392 4000

Drive type: Front 4WD 6-speed manual, Front 4WD, 6-speed manual.

Tires Bridgestone RE050A235 45 Bridgestone RE070A225 45

ZR17 ZR17 (STI only).

Length x width x height mm 4490x1770x1450 4465x1740x1440

Curb weight kg 1482 1515

Front-to-rear weight ratio.

Unit power-to-weight ratio kg ps

Selling price (EUR) 41990 40900

Acceleration from a standstill s:

0-40 km/h

Acceleration in 4th gear, 5th gear, 6th gear

80-100km/h

Stage speed 250 255

Braking distance m100km h-0

200km/h-0

18m snake around the pile (km h).

Lap time Hockenheim short track (dry).

Hockenheim sprint (wet).

Paved with snow and gravel roads.

Comment: In stationary acceleration, the STI relies on a large displacement engine and special tires to prevail, and the EVO can only start at a speed below 5000 due to the limitations of the engine's electronic system, which is also one of the reasons for the defeat, but the acceleration to the rear EVO is due to the gearbox.

The speed is more tightly choreographed, and it has better acceleration ability in the high-end position, and it has an absolute advantage in gear acceleration from the 140 generation. STI leads the way on the dry track, but the judges believe that the EVO controls more precisely and the 4WD system works more harmoniously.

AYC Active Yaw Control distributes most of the power to the outside wheels of corners, with understeer and oversteer not being noticeable. The rear end of the STI is lively and has more rear-wheel drive features, which airy enthusiasts may enjoy.

But it's harder to control than Evo. STI is resolute in cornering, but when accelerating out of corners, the rear swing is larger, and the reverse direction will cause the front of the car to drift to the outside of the track, alternating between understeer and oversteer, requiring the driver to be fast.

Skillfully control the steering wheel. As a result, STI lost slightly in the Hockenheim sprint (wet) and the snow-paved gravel road. STIs, on the other hand, hone the rider's skills.

There are some personality kits on both sides, such as the STI ** differential that manually adjusts the front and rear power distribution, and the EVO has a sporty configuration worth 2,500 euros, including BBS wheels weighing only kilograms, Bilstein shock absorbers and carbon fibre rear wing.

EVO is good, the engine technology is very advanced.

Mitsubishi EVO has added some e-aid.

Novices can be more comfortable driving.

The engine is more difficult to lift.

Subaru Impreza.

Simpler It is more suitable for the car player to discover his potential.

Subaru Impreza is easy to modify.

Subaru is good, because Subaru is a performance car. Good modification. Subaru is all about providing a platform. Let yourself play for yourself. Refit.

These 2 are born rivals.

Of course, I chose Impreza for a very simple reason.

Because the streets are full of models like Evo.

And the sound of the engine evo is not as powerful as the impreza! Just listening to the engine sound of the Impreza is very refreshing! And EVO sales are not as bright as Impreza!

There is also a 4th floor one.

What do you know.

Have you ever driven both Impreza and EVO?

Evo, you'd say the handling is good.

I guess you're talking about running the mountain road.

Evo is better than Impreza when coming out of the corner, isn't it?

Then I want to tell you about technical issues that are also very important.

The EVO has a higher torque, so it starts faster at low revs, so it's a little better than the Impreza when cornering! But the point is that the technology is not good, and the car is not to blame! These 2 cars have always been 4WD!

The 4WD handling characteristics are different from the general front-wheel drive car, which everyone knows, the throttle needs to be replenished in the bay, but how many are made up? Everyone says that you need to throw when you enter the corner, how many dare to throw? And don't forget that the Impreza is a horizontal recumbent engine, emphasizing a low center of gravity.

Currently Impreza. The STI model has also been improved in terms of torque.

Definitely not losing to EVO when exiting corners!

ps.The Impreza model and the EVO 5th and 8th generations have been opened! So I know! Heard or written in magazines.

It's the difference between what I actually experienced.

Do you know!

The former king is also friend and foe, who do you prefer?

Subaru late grip collapse STI and yard round Mitsubishi EVO "performance" friendship!

From the very beginning, the EVO was a racing pedigree, powered by a 2-litre turbocharged engine that made 280 hp without altering the engine and was all-wheel drive. 0-100 seconds. The maximum speed is about 240 mph.

If modified, it can reach 600 horsepower. According to the driver's operation, the fastest gear can be changed in seconds, and the power is not wasted at all.

The Subaru Impreza Impreza has achieved excellent results in the previous WRC World Rally Championships with its excellent performance. The design, development and production of the production car have also been applied to the successful experience of the competition, the Subaru Impreza WRX inherits the pure racing bloodline, and the ninth-generation Impreza is equipped with a new engine, and the original car is equipped with a secondary air intake system, bringing more power enjoyment to the driver and passengers.

The two so-called low-key sports cars are not only close to the people but also beyond imagination in terms of performance, extraordinary cost performance, and only they can be compared with the same performance at the same price. In addition, the economic crisis of the WRC last year caused many teams to quit despite their good results but poor sales. Fuji Mitsubishi (Mitsubishi withdrew a few years ago) and so on, now the only Fuji is not playing, and the previous logo is not playing, one hates the FIA practice, and the other has switched to other fields, such as Fuji running the domestic Super GT, and the logo running LM.

On the contrary, the results are not bad after turning heads. As for Citroen, why don't Peugeot and Ford make a commercial version of the WRC's race car. In fact, the rally cars they use are all mass-produced on the market, relatively low-end, and mainly for marketization.

The venue of the rally will leave a shell of the car, and all the others will be modified into racing cars. If you turn them into special versions, the cost will be higher, and the market will be more expensive, and low-end users will be happy, and high-end users will certainly not want to buy it. The company mainly depends on sales, and only when there is money can there be more energy to compete.

Forehead ......Because you can buy million-level performance for hundreds of thousands, because they are called "Japanese superchargers" ,...In the WRC, the cars in their group have been changed for millions of dollars, and basically only the shell is the original, and the modified is not the original, but the team itself has changed, so Citroen may not have the ability to make any "commercial version"....In addition, in the WRC, the performance of the modified group is almost the same, mainly depending on the driver hired by the team...Citroen invited Loeb, DB Ford has Mikko

Each is good in its own way, and the performance is similar.

If you like red, then EVO

If you like the blue one, just wrx sti (not wrx, it's the back sti) Hehe.

Personally, I think Subaru Impreza Wrx STI is a little better.

Prefer the subaru's boxer-opposed engine and a 50:50 front and rear weight ratio.

Subaru performance is better than Mitsubishi!! I feel pretty much the same!!