Why Chinese history and world history are read separately

Chinese history is the same history as world history, but the history of China alone has a long history, and what happened in the long river of Chinese history during the same period may still be relatively pale in the rest of the world, so you can think of Chinese history as a separate historical discipline, and in world history, their historical development started relatively late and cannot be synchronized with Chinese history.

Education itself should follow the cognitive laws of learners. In general, we will have some understanding of Chinese history, and world history involves more geographical knowledge, coupled with the characteristics of large span and high generalization of history, it will increase the difficulty of learning. The curriculum is designed in this way so that beginners can master the basic methods of learning history and research, and on the basis of accumulating a certain amount of knowledge, follow the laws of educational cognition from the familiar to the unknown, from the simple to the complex.

When we study history, we study Chinese history separately from world history because before the opening of new shipping routes, the history of the whole world was a relatively closed local history.

Prior to this, the interweaving of Chinese history and world history was very limited, so it was studied separately.

It can be found that before the opening of the new shipping route, we talked about Chinese history only from its longitudinal context.

After the opening of the new shipping route, under the influence of the first westward study of the east, the narrow local history had the opportunity to observe the world horizontally.

World history is different from China's development history, if we want to synthesize, the history of our country is relatively detailed, the modern one can be referred to, and the ancient one is not easy to say.

Because there is only socialism and capitalism in the world. Do you think you can refer to information that is not good for you at home?

Don't care so much, as Chinese, of course, will tell the history of China in relative detail, which is understandable, if the world history is also described in such detail, the ins and outs of each civilization are clearly written, then our primary school students do not need to study other courses, after graduation are all historians, any country, the history of the country has a bias is certain.

So if the history of the world and the history of China are compiled into a book, I personally think it is not necessary, because in ancient times, various civilizations had little contact and basically developed independently, so in addition to time, there is basically no need to mix them. Even if you write a domestic history, sometimes you have to write it separately, such as the history of the Northern and Southern Dynasties, if it is mixed, it will look confusing.

With Chinese history, then world history naturally refers to the history outside of China, and it is logical that Chinese history does not enter world history.

Because if taken together, there are many things that cannot be explained by the Chinese historical community, and it is impossible to justify themselves.

If you are interested, look at this, the world historians ridicule China for distorting history.

This is because the Ministry of Education does not quite accept the concept of big history in compiling books, and still likes to separate China and talk about how good we are, which is the reason why the textbook should emphasize China and ignore it.

Mainstream world history, Chinese history, is marginalized because his influence on the world is extremely limited. More often than not, we are influenced by others, such as Buddhism and Islam, and even more so in modern times. To a large extent, this is due to geographical factors and China's own national characteristics.

Experts on China have only become popular in recent years, and in the past, experts in the study of Chinese history in foreign universities were very out of the mainstream.

Therefore, the study of Chinese history can largely abandon world history, but the study of history in the context of the larger historical background does have a broader vision.

I feel:

By separating Chinese history from world history, the Ministry of Education may have wanted to explain Chinese history in a more detailed and comprehensive way. You also said that teaching Chinese history for two years and world history for one year may be to give more students more time to understand China. As for what you said about China's lack of appearance in world history, nor did you explain the position and influence of ancient China in the world, I think that a student of the age of one can understand that.

The influence of ancient China in the world includes many things, politics, culture, war, social status, and the strong contempt of Confucianism for foreign countries called barbarians. I think students who are interested in history will go to the library or search the Internet to find out this problem, and students who are not interested in this area, even if you talk about this, it is impossible to spend a lot of time looking for these materials, after all, history is still a relatively dull subject, and if it includes the complex relationship with the world at that time, I don't think all students of all ages can figure it out.

At that time, China had not yet reached a high level and was not famous, so there was none.

Due to the division of labor in China's history profession, it is customary to divide world history and Chinese history into two parts, and this habit almost makes us feel as if world history is synonymous with foreign history. Practically one. Why separate the 2 parts of learning, probably.

World history is a comprehensive investigation of the history of various regions, countries and nationalities, with a wide range of introductions and a wide range of regions, while Chinese history is mainly to focus on understanding "Chinese history", and the purpose of learning to understand is different, and your idea of blending together is very good, in fact, while talking about world history, the teacher will remind you of the events that are taking place in Chinese history during the same period.

World history also has a section on Chinese history, but you don't think it's detailed enough, world history is like an encyclopedia, and then you can integrate Chinese history into it, wow, I'm a big head.

Because of the different emphases of the two, world history focuses on the social, economic, and humanistic impact of events that occurred in different periods of the world from then to the present. However, Chinese history has narrowed the scope of influence and events, and the impact on events is mainly confined to China and neighboring countries.

It's all going to be more systematic, but at the end of the review, we're going to talk about it together.

Getting it together will greatly increase the burden on students.

This --- ask the editor!

Of course, Chinese must be very familiar with the history of their own country, and compared with other countries, just use a general understanding of the line, in the history of the world do not talk about China, it is normal, Chinese history is so detailed, it needs to be repeated, and China, since ancient times, it has been a policy of closing the country, and there is little contact with other countries, and there is nothing to say

You are right, the world history we study should actually be called foreign history. The biggest problem in our study of history is that we just memorize by rote without thinking. In history lessons, we should ask people to think about topics such as "the place of Chinese history in world history" and "the contribution of Chinese civilization to world fame".

In this way, it is interesting to study history. It not only takes history as a mirror, but also cultivates a sense of national pride and responsibility, as well as a global consciousness.

In my opinion, there are two reasons: first, there were no means of transportation and communication in the world at that time, so there were very few connections between them, and the civilization and development of one country could not affect the rest of the world. Second, we have to talk about your subject arrangement, about the history of China, we have taken out a whole school year to talk about, and about the history of the world has also taken out a school year to talk about it, and these are equal. It's not that the history of the integration of the world and China is not untold, but it is that you have not yet reached the time, and you will start to contact it when you are in high school, and you will start formal in-depth research when you are in college.

If you feel that the textbook misleads your thinking, then this is the starting point of your thinking, and the end of your thinking is likely to return to the textbook, because that is the consensus of previous thinking.

In the textbook, we can only record some big and exact events, and those small inaccuracies cannot be all recorded, which is waiting for us to study and think. Welcome to the exchange.

This is just a teaching strategy, besides, I am Chinese, of course, I focus on Chinese history alone, world history in ancient times mainly talked about North Africa and Europe, and there was relatively little connection with the East, so it is impossible to connect the two at great length.

Chinese history has already taught about China, so there is no need to talk about world history. The reason for the separation, naturally, is because we are Chinese, hehe, in this regard the Chinese are still very vain.

China is a country with a long history, and as the sons and daughters of China, we should be proud of the civilization founded by our ancestors!!

The A.D. chronology system was adopted to unify Chinese history with world historical years, 227 A.D., and in countries that adopted A.D. 227 A.D.

The calendar and chronology of the People's Republic of China adopt the Western Yuan era of most countries in the world, but still use the traditional lunar calendar of China, which was decided by the first plenary session of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in September 1949. At the meeting, it was unanimously agreed that the chronological system common to most countries in the modern world should be adopted, that is, the Western Yuan should be used as the chronology of New China. On September 27, the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference adopted:

The chronology of the People's Republic of China is in Western Yuan.

No. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, we took the initiative to unify with the West. A.D. 227 is post-converted.

Because except for China, other countries were either colonized by Europe or did not have a long history, and in general, the culture is similar to European culture, so there is no need to study it separately. The cultures of ancient Egypt, ancient Babylon, and ancient India are all broken, and they are no longer the current cultures of Egypt, West Asia, and India, so they are not studied separately. And the history of China has never been interrupted since ancient times, this is the only one in the world, and the culture is very different from other cultures, so it should be studied separately.

Because China is the only civilization among all civilizations that has a continuous history of 5,000 years without major discontinuity. In short, it means that Chinese civilization has a strong continuity and has its own system in terms of historical research.

Because in ancient times, China was very powerful, and China was leading the world trend at that time, so it is necessary to learn separately. In short, because China is the only civilization among all civilizations that has a continuous history of 5,000 years without major discontinuity. Chinese civilization has a strong continuity and is self-contained in historical research.

China's history is very special. So, of course, it has to be separated.

In fact, world history includes Chinese history. If Chinese history were to be completely covered in world history, it would be a huge work, too complicated and too troublesome. It is absolutely necessary to have a single book on the vast and profound history of China, so as not to leave out some necessary things and not to make world history too complicated.

In line with the trend of history, China has changed from a primitive society to a slave society to a feudal society to a semi-colonized and semi-feudal society, to a socialist society, and the world is a primitive society to a slave society to a feudal society and a capitalist society.

In a word: it is a history of development and progress.

Because this book is mainly for Chinese, and most Chinese can find more comprehensive and professional books to read about China, there is no need to write these things, and there is also the influence of the orthodox Chinese history education system that separates Chinese history from world history.

Because we learn Chinese history from a young age.