Has LeBron James surpassed Larry Bird in his prime?

Judging from the data, James is not inferior to Larry Bird at his peak, in terms of personal honors, in addition to 3 rings less than Bird, James's other honors are not much different from Bird, and James's career still has a long way to go, maybe his championship will be equal to Bird in the future, this is an unknown, in terms of technology, James plays more fiercely with super physical fitness, and can make a lot of technical moves against the sky, which Bird can't do, but Bird's shooting skills are stronger than Jade's, Both are two styles of players, but both are versatile.

Although it can't surpass Chamberlain's single-game record. Either way, LeBron James will become one of the best NBA players in NBA history.

It's hard to say, the benevolent will see the benevolent, I think I have surpassed Bird in terms of influence, and I am not as good as Bird in terms of honor. In terms of body, James completely exploded Bird, and in terms of technology, James led in an all-round way, but the projection technology was one street worse than Bird.

2 different eras, different styles, depending on the fans' own preferences.

James will be fine for a few more years.

Statistically, it's about the same, but LeBron is still young and could reach even greater heights.

In fact, this can't be said to be super or not surpassed, because they are not people of the same era, James can now be said to be the strongest in the NBA, Bird is also very good, Nowitzki is very similar to Big Bird's play, both are PF, and they are both strong in shooting and offensive ends, so that the two players can be compared, I personally like it, there is no transcendence between basketball, there is innovation, and the characteristics of each player.

No, he can't be invincible in his personal abilities.

James is a very strong individual player in the league today, but compared to Larry Bird, I think James's technique is not delicate enough, it can only be said that James is very good in terms of physical fitness, and his individual ability is also excellent, but it cannot be said that he surpasses Larry Bird, and then we will analyze it in detail.

James is recognized for his outstanding physical fitness, his strength is very strong, and he is recognized as the core of the team, but also because his physical fitness is too good, he often relies too much on strength in the game, and he is not a player with delicate skills, and he has simplified the movements that can be simplified, and he does have a superior ball quotient, and is the organizer of the team. James has an advantage over Bird, after all, his physical fitness is there, but at the technical level, Bird is more delicate and more comprehensive.

In terms of basketball skills, there are top players in a certain aspect, such as Curry's three-point shooting, Duncan's boarding, etc., but Bode can be said to be perfect in every aspect, and his all-round is incomparable to James. Although James has a high ball quotient, but when it comes to his contribution to the team, team quality and leadership, I don't think Bird is worse than James, especially in terms of team leadership, although James is the core of the team, but his frequent team changes are not able to convince the public or grind. And James' excellent physical fitness has indeed allowed him to extend his career, and he is more dominant in this regard, looking at the achievements and abilities at his peak, he has not completely surpassed Bird.

To sum up, I think James is a player with very strong individual ability, but Bird's strength is also very comprehensive, James's career is still ongoing, although it cannot be said to be completely surpassing James now, but it is difficult to guarantee that James will be evaluated higher than Bird after retiring in the future.

yes, I think the two guys are actually the same, and on the same level, and I think Larry Bird is better, and I've seen this game and it's a really good defense and a big forward. Both WS and PER are taller than James.

James has indeed surpassed Larry Bird in terms of ability. He's really a legendary player and I've always had a good impression of him.

In terms of ability, he has surpassed this opponent, because James has now set a lot of records, and he has scored the most points in the entire NBA, and he can be said to be the No. 1 person in the NBA.

I think I've surpassed Larry Bird in terms of ability, but not in terms of technology and influence. The specific reasons are as follows:

Judging from various data and actual combat, James's efficiency is higher than that of Bird, you can say that James has Wade, Bosh, and Irving around him, but Bird also has at least two of the top 100 giants in the NBA (Parish's status is far greater than that of Bosh). In addition, James had already led the team to the Finals alone before going to the Heat, and his ability was stronger than that of the big birds in the same period.

In terms of influence, Bird lived in the '80s, when he himself represented the highest level of white athletes, and the latter part of that era was the "black and white era", with big birds against magic. In an era when all blacks and no foreign players were available, Bird himself was already a spiritual symbol, and James was only a hero to the Clevelands after the Cavaliers won the championship.

From the perspective of personal image, Big Bird is meticulous, and he can't sit on the bench until the end of the back injury, and he still plays in the finals, which is a performance of challenging his own limits and willpower. James went from "deciding" to "going home", and repeatedly did a lot of things that had nothing to do with basketball and his profession for his own commercial value. If you count the spiritual things, the courage to face difficulties, and the ability, Bird surpasses James.

Joe's "flu war" is the "flu war" that leads the way and wins the public, and James doesn't seem to be willing to put himself in a desperate situation.

On the defensive end, Bird's off-ball defense was the top at the time, not to mention all kinds of legends, and defensive rebounds were also above LeBron. When it comes to off-ball defense, both have their own strengths. When both of them are healthy, they both have an excellent sense of rotation and filling.

But defensively on the ball, Bird's problem comes. His single defense is excellent on the inside, but he can't defend on the perimeter. So much so that during the Celtics period, the opponent's No. 3 position has always been played by Maxwell or McHale, so there will be a spectacle of McHale going to Adrian Dantley.

In his defensive prime, LeBron was actually able to defend five positions.

Personally, I think that James's strength is relatively strong, and he has surpassed Larry Bird and won a lot of honors.

I think it's more than that, first of all, it's more efficient than Larry Berry, and James has led the team to the Finals on his own before going to the Heat, but not in terms of technique and history.

Not really. James is not as good as the other in terms of technology, and there is a big difference in the shooting percentage of the two men.

Larry Bird and James are stronger than James.

1. In terms of physical fitness and physical confrontation, James can be on par with Howard, while Larry Bird's physical fitness is more average.

2. Defensive system, the defensive system of the Larry Bird era is not as formalized as the defensive system of the NBA now.

3. In terms of organizational and strategic ability, James and Bird are both all-round players, scoring, rebounding, assisting, and stealing, and Larry Bird's three-point shooting ability is stronger than James.