India, which has the world s largest GDP growth rate and the second largest population in the world,

Because many cities in this area have the problem of excessive population density, they do not build high-rise buildings.

The main reason is that the gap between the rich and the poor in the region is too large. For example, the capital New Delhi has a concentration of rich people and a developed economy, so there are naturally many high-rise buildings, while other cities are either poor or have poor transportation and economy, so naturally they will not build so many high-rise buildings.

Because India has a very large land area and the population density is not very large, there is no need to build high-rise buildings.

India, which also has a large population, is faced with countless high-rise buildings in our country, why are they indifferent and do not build high-rise buildings like our country? Do you know why?

We all know that China and India are both populous countries, so they are always compared. In our country, in order to alleviate the pressure on housing, we will build all kinds of high-rise buildings for people to live in. In neighboring India, with a population of more than 1.3 billion, they don't build high-rise buildings like we doThe difference between the two depends on the land issue.

Although we have two-thirds more land than they do, our land is either high mountains or basins, and the land is not as flat as in India, and because of this, the arable land and the area of houses that can be built are not as good as in India.

In other words, although China's land is relatively vast, but the terrain is relatively complex, and our current agricultural development is not the first place, rural development is relatively slow, many people go to the city, in order to alleviate the problem of large urban population and little housing, so China has built a large number of high-rise buildings.

India, on the other hand, has a large population on their land, but it is enough for them, even if 1.3 billion people build a house each, there is enough land space.

The different economic developments between the two countries,If you want to build a tall building, you need a lot of money in addition to having the technology to build it. Funding is more difficult for India now. If they have to spend 7 times the money to build a high-rise building when they have enough to live, Indians will still choose affordable bungalows to build, and feel that the construction of high-rise buildings is unnecessary.

Another reason is that Indians' land is privatized, and basically no one wants to sell their land. Therefore, the above reasons are enough for a long time: India rarely builds high-rise buildings, and despite such a large population, it is still willing to live in bungalows.

The main reason is that India does not have enough productivity, and the employment rate is very low, and the facilities are relatively backward now, and the gap between the rich and the poor in India is very large, and the religious atmosphere in India is very strong, and the faith is to be content with the status quo and obey the dispatch of God.

This question is related to the construction of the country, the economy and the humanities and culture, although India has a large population, but the economic development is not as good as ours, and the Indians have a heavier belief and prefer retro style.

Because India's economy is not developed enough, and the land area is very large, there is no need to build high-rise buildings, so it does not build high-rise buildings like our country.

According to the latest world population ranking in 2019, India ranks second with a population of 100 million, compared with China's 1.4 billion population in the first place, the gap is less than 40 million. Compared with China's 9.6 million square kilometers of territory, India's land area is only 2.98 million square kilometers, about one-third of China's territory. India can be said to be one of the most densely populated countries in the world, so the question is, India's population is only 40 million and China's area is less than one-third, why is India not popular for high-rise buildings?

Is the state of the city still dominated by flatbread bungalows or low-rise buildings?

First of all, we need to know that the gap between the rich and the poor in India is extremely serious, most of the wealth is controlled by a very small number of people, and most of the people have little money. So with the economic level of most Indians, they simply can't afford to buy that kind of high-rise residential building. Since it can't afford to buy this kind of building, India naturally won't build too many such buildings, and if it can't sell it, it will lose a lot.

As for the few wealthy people who can afford such buildings, they have a better choice than those of taller residential buildings, that is, villas or lower single-family buildings.

Of course, there is another reason. In terms of the influence of culture and values, it is clear that Indians are more influenced by Western countries. If we look at the major cities in the West, vigorously developing high-rise buildings is not an option for Western countries, especially in Europe, which pays attention to practicality, not high-rise buildings, and everywhere you can see people living in four- to five-story buildings, and there are very few buildings higher than five floors.

Looking at the latest top 10 tallest buildings in the world, there is not a single one in Europe, which shows that Europeans do not pursue height. India was once a British colony and was ruled by the British for more than 200 years, and its culture and values are close to those of Europeans. Building more high-rise buildings is not the value of Indians, which is another reason why there are fewer high-rise buildings in India.

Another point is that India is mostly flat plains, so the land utilization rate is very high, and India accounts for 10% of the world's arable land. According to experts, India's usable land could support more than 2.5 billion people. Therefore, even if a large number of high-rise buildings can be built in Indian cities, it is completely useless and a waste, which India also knows well.

Indians have always had a kind of self-confidence, they must have thought about building all kinds of high-rise buildings in the city, even if it is useless, at least it can support the scene, but because of various problems in reality, they simply can't do it, so high-rise buildings are rare in Indian cities. <>

People's big cities are also full of high-rise buildings. It's just that many people are poor, they sleep on the streets, and they can't afford it.

Because India's economic level is relatively low, the country has no money, so naturally it cannot build high-rise buildings.

Because India's manufacturing level is particularly low, India simply does not have the strength to build high-rise buildings, no money, and no manpower.

The main reason is that the level of construction in India is limited enough to build many high-rise buildings, which are particularly rare there.

This is because there are a lot of poor people in Thailand, so there is no need to build high-rise buildings, and the utilization rate is not high. So there's no need to build it.

It is not so simple to build a high-rise building, it requires relatively high technology, and it also needs good materials, and secondly, it is also very related to a country's national strength and people's living standards.

India has a large population, but there are hierarchies, there are many poor people, and the fiscal income is very small, and there is not so much money to build buildings.

This is because India's rural population is too large to support urbanization. In addition, India's economy is relatively weak, per capita GDP is low, polarization is serious, urban slums can be seen everywhere, the poor cannot afford to buy a house, and the rich often disdain to live in high-rise buildings, so there is a lack of market for the development of high-rise buildings in India.

By the standards of this list (62nd at 350 meters), Mumbai's only skyscraper, the number one in the world, is likely to make the list. The building was planned to be meters high in early days, but it was not approved by the Airports Authority of India. In 2015, the engineering design height had to be reduced to meters.

As a result, it was not completed until 2018 and is only 285 meters high. It is reported that the new height of the development may not be approved by the Indian airport, which is a very embarrassing situation.

In addition to being number one in the world, Lokhandwala Minerva, the second tallest building in India, is only 325 meters away from the list.

As we all know, India's population is closely following China's world's first, with a total population of 100 million in 2019, and it is expected to surpass China to become the world's most populous country in a few years. This figure may seem common to Chinese, but for India, the land that feeds such a population is only 2.98 million square kilometers, less than 31% of China's.

It is reasonable to say that India's man-land contradictions should be three times greater than China's. Why is China full of skyscrapers, even in.

Fourth- and fifth-tier cities, while India's population is almost the same, but there are no skyscrapers?

In fact, not only does India not have the world's super skyscrapers, but there are also very few ordinary high-rise buildings. Apart from Mumbai, India's four largest cities, including Delhi, Kolkata, and Chennai, have few high-rise buildings. If we analyze carefully, it is not difficult to find that there are two main reasons for the lack of high-rise buildings in India:

First, the contradiction between man and land is weaker than China's, and second, the level of development is also weaker than China's.

Therefore, although China has a vast territory, the actual arable land is only 10,000 square kilometers, while India has 1.6 million square kilometers of arable land. If calculated according to China's current ratio of arable land to population (10,000 square kilometers and 100 million people), India needs to carry 100 million people to meet China's current population pressure.

In addition, India is also weaker than China in terms of development. In 2017, China's total economic volume was trillions of dollars, while India's was only one trillion dollars, less than 20% of China's; In terms of urbanization rate, China's urbanization rate in 2017 was 58%, while India's urbanization rate was only 32%, equivalent to about 36% in 2000.

In other words, the proportion of India's rural population is too large to support urbanization. In addition, India's economy is relatively weak, with a low GDP per capita and high polarization. Urban slums are everywhere.

The poor can't afford to buy a house, while the rich often disdain to live in high-rise buildings. As a result, there is a lack of market for the development of tall buildings in India.

The two reasons mentioned above are why India has more high-rise buildings than China. But this is only temporary. I believe that as India continues to grow and progress, the path that China is taking now will also be the path of India's future.

Because India's development is weaker than China's, its rural population is too large to support urbanization.

The gap between rich and poor is too wide. The gap between the rich and the poor in India is the largest in the world, the rich have everything, the poor can't even afford to eat, and they still have money to buy high-rise buildings, not to mention that there are only a very small number of rich people, and they can't use so many high-rise buildings.

Because India's infrastructure construction is not as developed as China's, it lacks the conditions and foundation to build high-rise buildings, so it is not popular.

India is also a country with a large population, with more than 1.3 billion people, and they are all catching up with us. The country is less than a third of ours, so why don't they use high-rise buildings?