Are the current Hungarians the descendants of the Huns in history?

The current Hungarians are not the descendants of the historical Huns, who integrated into the cultures of many ethnic groups when they moved north, and the current Hungarians are more of a mixture of ethnic groups.

No, the real Huns have disappeared in the long river of history, and the current Hungarians are a mixture of the Huns and other ethnic groups at that time.

Now the Hungarians have Hun genes in their blood, so they are indeed descendants of the Huns.

Personally, I don't think so, after all, there have been so many ethnic migrations and ethnic integration in history, and the experience of this is very complicated, and we can't arbitrarily draw conclusions.

The two are not related in any way, the ancestors of the Hungarians are of mixed Ugric and Turkic descent. The Turks were nomadic people who lived during the Tang Dynasty, while the Xiongnu were a northern minority who lived during the Han Dynasty. During the Han Dynasty, the Xiongnu were partially destroyed and partly sinicized.

And the Turks are a re-emerging ethnic minority.

The Hungarians are likely to be descendants of the Xiongnu, and there is a rumor that after the Han Dynasty defeated the Northern Xiongnu, they came to Europe to become today's Hungarian ancestors, but Hungary officially does not recognize Hungary as a descendant of the Xiongnu.

The Xiongnu were once strong in the early Western Han Dynasty, but soon withdrew from the stage of Chinese history and disappeared without a trace. In the 4th century, a strong nomadic people rose in eastern Europe and established the Kingdom of Hungary, which became the ancestor of modern Hungarians. So, are this nomadic people the Huns who disappeared in China?

In his work "Journey to the East", Luberuk expressed his opinion on the relationship between the Huns and the Hungarians: "The Zagek River (present-day Ural River) originated in Baskatir in the north, and the ancient Huns came from this country, and later became the Hungarians. The language of the Bascatir people is the same as that of the Hungarians, hence the name Hungary.

Chinese scholars also agree with the claim that the Hungarians are descendants of the Huns, and they also compare the Huns and the Hungarians in terms of language, history, folklore, and other aspects, and point out many similarities between the two.

In fact, before the founding of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Hungarians' kinship with the Huns was once recognized. In the first half of the 19th century, the famous Hungarian scholar Křörğ Jomo Sandor also traveled to Central Asia and China in search of his roots. However, around the time of the founding of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the situation changed.

The Finno-Urger school of history was also officially accepted because it was supported by the Austrian Habsburgs. Based on the results of linguistic research, this historical school determined that the Hungarian language belonged to the Finno-Uger language family, and thus determined that the ancestors of the Hungarians were close to the Finno-Uger people and had no relationship with the Huns. Now, the official historical conclusion, supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, also holds that the ancestors of the Hungarians were not Huns, nor were they relatives.

Although not officially recognized by Hungary, the Hungarian kinship with the Huns is still talked about by many scholars. As for the official conclusion of Hungary, the forest roll is not without problems. There was a process of assimilation, and the Huns may have been more influenced by the Finno-Uger language after emigrating to Europe, and at the same time, in the process of integrating with the European peoples, they gradually lost their original national identity.

Therefore, it is not objective enough to deny the relations of the Hungarians with the Huns on the basis of language alone. As the archaeological work progresses, it is believed that the mystery will one day be solved.

The Huns are now Mongols.

The Xiongnu who stayed on the Mongolian Plateau in ancient times gradually became sinicized and became the current Mongolian people, and the Mongolian, Turkic, and Khitan ethnic groups are all their descendants. Now there are only Mongols, so the Xiongnu are the current Mongols. Through the technical analysis of the excavated remains in Mongolia, it is very similar to the ancient Xiongnu.

The Xiongnu were a nomadic people living in northern China, whose ancestors lived at the junction of cold temperate forests and steppes in Siberia in Eurasia. The "Historical Records: The Biography of the Xiongnu" records the descendants of the Xiongnu, their ancestor Xia Hou, also known as Zhezhi. According to the Huns, they were descendants of Chunwei, the son of Xia Wei.

The Xiongnu in history

Wang Guowei made a systematic summary of the evolution of the name of the Xiongnu in "Ghost Fang Kunyi Monkey Examination", and believed that the ghost Fang, Chaoyi, and Qiangqi in the Shang Dynasty, the Qiang in the Zhou Dynasty, the Rong and Di in the Spring and Autumn Period, and the Hu in the Warring States Period were all the so-called Xiongnu in later generations.

The unification of this title should be in the Han Dynasty, before that, the influence of the northern nomads on the Central Plains was limited, the Spring and Autumn Period of the Qi State, the Warring States Period of the Zhao State had beaten the Xiongnu, especially Li Mu had a small number of troops to hit the Xiongnu hard, so that the Xiongnu did not dare to commit it again for a long time. Before the Qin Dynasty, the Xiongnu were not strong, and after the establishment of the Qin Dynasty, Qin Shi Huang also sent Meng Tian to lead 300,000 mountain high oak troops to expel the Xiongnu from the Hetao and the Hexi Corridor.

The ancestors of the Xiongnu were called "Donghu" in the early Warring States period.

No. The Hungarians called themselves Magyars. The early Magyars were considered nomadic peoples"Ethnic minorities"Because the nomadic peoples of Eurasia mostly speak Indo-European and Turkic languages, it is very rare for people like them to speak Ugric.

The Magyars are not related to the Turks, Mongols, or Scythians, and have lived for generations in the low hills of the southern Ural Mountains, and some in the very cold northern part of Eurasia, and are close relatives of the contemporary Finns and Estonians.

For example, the Huns who appeared in the area east of the Black Sea at the end of the 4th century AD were once suspected by the historiography of being the descendants of the Huns who had been defeated by the Han Dynasty and moved westward, but after a series of theories and archaeological excavations, the Huns and the Huns were not directly related, they were more like the first group of Ugrics who went south, that is, the Huns were the ancestors of the Magyars.

Now, the official conclusion, supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, also holds that the ancestors of the Hungarians first came from the "Finno-Ugric" or Magyars, a nomadic people near the foothills of the Ural Mountains on the border of Eurasia, who were not Huns, were not relatives of the Huns by blood, and had no linguistic relationship.

Culturally, the Magyars are in some ways similar to the East Asian cultural sphere. For example, the Hungarian name is named first name, then first name, and last identity, which is completely opposite to the surrounding Indo-European language family, and the same order as East Asian peoples (Chinese, Japanese, etc.), the order is first and last name. But this alone does not mean that the Hungarians have substantial ties with the East Asian peoples, both in terms of culture and blood.

No, it's hot.

thought that if he was a descendant of the Huns, no one would bully him.

In fact, it's a country that specializes in roast beef with potatoes.