How do you manage a hands on boss?

As a leader, you do a lot of things yourself, and if you don't trust your subordinates, you will only make yourself busier and busier, which will not only cause low work efficiency, but also make your subordinates have negative emotions.

No, such a leader will make your subordinates feel that you don't trust them, you should arrange the work reasonably to each employee, all you have to do is to review the work.

It's not very good to do that; We should give some work to our subordinates, give them some rights appropriately, and choose some more capable people to do things.

It's not good to be a leader who does everything yourself. Work should be reasonably distributed at work.

There are different opinions on this issue. x0d x0a opposes that the leader leads the whole team, and that the team spirit cannot be reflected if everything is done by himself, and the key reason why a good leader will lead is because of the prestige he shows in the management process. As a leader, only with strong authority can you attract subordinates to work hard willingly.

The level of prestige determines the level of leadership. x0d x0a agrees that a good leader sometimes has to be hands-on. On the one hand, it can improve the efficiency of decision-making, and on the other hand, it can enable leaders to effectively control the whole process of specific work.

When an enterprise is in the early stage of entrepreneurship, in the extension of the development period of extensive operation, in the case of small enterprise scale, lack of professional talents, and imperfect internal management mechanism, leaders need to do it themselves, not only as combatants, but also as commanders. However, with the continuous development and growth of enterprises, the requirements for fine management are getting higher and higher, and they are in a period of connotative development, the scale of enterprises is expanding, professionals are becoming more and more abundant, and the internal management mechanism is constantly improving. x0d x0a concludes that regardless of the view, as a leader, you must understand that everything that subordinates can do, they should be empowered to do, and leaders should only do what leaders should do.

Whatever has been delegated to his subordinates, the leader must restrain himself and stop meddling; Leaders only need to take care of things that don't have an exception to the delegation of authority. Depending on the urgency of the matter and the circumstances in which you live, you should decide whether you want to do it yourself, rather than doing everything yourself. This kind of leadership who is unwilling to delegate power can only exhaust himself in the end, and the department team cannot play its due role.

Wise leaders don't adopt this management model.

Leadership is a kind of management ability, and if you do something yourself, it is not leadership, it is labor. Leadership is to have a direction for doing things, give the team a sense of direction and mission, and can steer the team forward. Tasks can be reasonably assigned and is a form of qualified leadership.

The leader is equivalent to the brain of an organization or group, playing the role of organizing and guiding the direction, and is the person who pays attention to strategy, so he does not have to do everything himself, otherwise he is not a leader, and a good leader should delegate power to the people under him, so that he can do his job.

Of course not, do everything yourself, is it still called leadership?

Not good. Because you will exhaust yourself to death, and you will cultivate a group of employees who are incompetent and lazy, and in the end you will become more and more tired, and the company will become worse and worse. You just have to stand tall, look far, look for a few subordinates with good leadership skills as your right-hand men, and then assign tasks to them, and then let them distribute tasks to grassroots employees, so that you will not be so tired.

It's not good, you are the leader, you have to take out the leader's style, do everything yourself, it may make employees look down on you, or disrespect you, this is not a good phenomenon, you should do what you do, and find employees to complete other things, otherwise what are you recruiting so many people for.

I think this is not good, there are too many things in the company, and the leader can't do everything himself, and it is easy for employees to be lazy.