Comparison of the i7 920 and Q9650

The i7 is a native quad-core, the Q9650 is a glue quad-core--- two E8400s are packaged together.

The i7 is an LGA1366 interface, which is different from the LGA775 interface of the Q9650. The i7 uses a QPI bus, has a built-in memory controller, and only supports DDR3 memory. The performance is much better than that of the Q9650.

However, it is more expensive to build the i7 platform, and the x58 motherboard is not cheap. Comparatively speaking, the Q9650 is cheaper. But the CPU of the Q9650 is more expensive than that of the i7.

Actually, in a word.

If you want to, buy the i7

If you are not willing to buy Q9650

On the i7 then the entire motherboard of the ** memory adds up.

It may be about 1000 yuan higher than the previous Q9650 (mine is like this), but the performance of the i7 is still there.

Ignore multithreading.

i7 can run pi for 15 seconds at the default frequency.

Summary. Good afternoon, dear, it's a pleasure to serve you, according to your problem, A85600K and i7930 are two processors, which belong to different eras and technical levels, and here are some comparisons between them:1

Architecture: The A85600K is based on AMD Zen architecture, and the i7930 is based on Intel Nehalem architecture. 2.

Number of cores: The A85600K has 6 cores, while the i7930 has only 4 cores. 3.

Number of threads: A85600K supports 12 threads, while i7930 only supports 8 threads. 4.

Frequency: A85600K is clocked at a frequency of Cache: A85600K has 8MB of L3 cache, and i7930 has only 8MB of L3 cache.

6.TDP: 95W for the A85600K and 130W for the i7930.

Pro, so to sum up, the A85600K is better than the i7930 in terms of cores, threads, clock speed, and cache, while the i7930 is higher in terms of TDP. If you need more computing power and performance, you can choose the A85600K. If you don't have high requirements for power consumption and heat dissipation, you can choose the i7930.

Whichever you choose, make a decision based on your needs and budget.

A 85600K vs i7930CPU comparison.

Good afternoon, it's a pleasure to serve you, according to your problem, A85600K and i7930 are two processors, which belong to different eras and technical levels, and here are some comparisons between them:1Architecture:

The A85600K is based on the AMD Zen architecture and the i7930 is based on the Intel Nehalem architecture. 2.Number of cores:

The A85600K has 6 cores and the i7930 has only 4 cores. 3.Number of threads:

The A85600K supports 12 threads, while the i7930 only supports 8 threads. 4.Frequency:

The main frequency of A85600K is that of i7930 Cache: A85600K has 8MB of L3 cache, and there is only 8MB of L3 cache without taking advantage of i7930. 6.

TDP: 95W for the A85600K and 130W for the i7930. Dear, so the A85600K is better than the i7930 in terms of cores, threads, clock speed, and cache, while the i7930 is higher in terms of TDP.

If you need more computing power and performance, you can choose the A85600K. If you don't have high requirements for power consumption and heat dissipation, you can choose the i7930. Whichever you choose, make a decision based on your needs and budget.

Pro, A85600K and i7930 are two processors of different years, A85600K is AMD's processor, and i7930 is Intel's processor. They have certain differences in performance, power consumption, **, etc. First of all, the A85600K is a relatively new processor that uses AMD's FM2+ interface, has 4 cores and 4 threads, and the main frequency is, the turbo frequency is, and the power consumption is 95W.

The i7930 is an older processor that uses the LGA1366 interface, has 4 cores and 8 threads, and the main frequency is, the turbo frequency is, and the power consumption is 130W. In terms of performance, the A85600K has slightly higher single-core performance than the i7930, but the i7930 is stronger than the A85600K in terms of multi-core nightshade energy. In addition, the i7930 also supports hyper-threading technology, which can perform better when multitasking.

In terms of power consumption, the A85600K's power consumption is a little lower than that of the i7930, which also means that it also generates relatively low heat. This is a benefit for both the computer's cooling system and the burden on the power supply. In terms of **, the **** of the A85600K is relatively low, while the ** of the i7930 is relatively high on the market today because it is an older processor.

Overall, if you need to do multi-threading, large-scale data processing, etc., the i7930 is a good choice. However, if there are certain requirements for heat generation and power consumption, and you also need to consider the cost performance, A85600K is also a good choice.

The A85600K is one of the AMD Ryzen 5 series processors, while the i7930 is one of the Intel Core i7 series processors, and the two are buried in different processor families, so there is a big difference in performance and specifications. In terms of performance, AMD Ryzen 5 5600K is a 6-core 12-thread processor, with a basic frequency of GHz and a boost frequency of GHz, using a 7nm process process, and the TDP power consumption before shouting is 65W, it has higher single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, which is suitable for running software and games that require the support of high-performance processors. The Intel Core i7 930 is a 4-core 8-thread processor, using a 45nm process, with a basic frequency of GHz and a boost frequency of GHz, and a TDP power consumption of 130W, the performance of the processor is slightly lower than that of AMD Ryzen 5 5600K, but it can be used with the motherboard of the Liquid Clear X58 chipset, and supports up to 24GB of three-channel DDR3 memory, which has advantages for some applications with higher memory requirements.

Overall, if you need a high-performance processor to run computationally intensive applications such as gaming,**, rendering, etc., then the AMD Ryzen 5 5600K is a better choice; If you need an app that supports more memory, then the Intel Core i7 930 may be a better choice. However, it should be noted that the above is only a simple comparison of the two processors, and the specific choice needs to be considered according to the needs, budget, and other hardware configurations.

7 920xm without CPU counterpoint, i7 740qm is equivalent to the third-generation Core i5 3360M.

The Core i7 of the notebook has two core models, the Linglian Sail suffix letter is ruler hail M is dual-core four-thread, and the suffix letter is QM (XM is the extreme version) is four-core and eight-thread, which is different from the desktop i7 CPU.

。。The generation of Core i7 970 is still very strong, six cores and twelve threads, the performance is only about 6% lower than the current i7 6700, but its TDP is a bit higher 920 Four cores and eight threads, TDP is also 130W, the performance is the same grade as i5 3330, about 5% lower than i3 7350K.

i7 920 is equivalent to what is now 970 is equivalent to what CPU is now, I don't know what question you want to consult, and you can't answer it literally, so you can't answer this question for you, I hope you understand.

The performance of the 920 is equivalent to that of the current 3rd generation, which is stronger than the current 4th generation i5. But due to the limitations of the motherboard. The motherboard chip is too old. The actual use experience is not as good as the current 4th generation i5.

i7 920 generation i7, three channels. x58 is weaker with a 4-core, 8-thread u. Chess runs to the point of hammering i3 6100

Frequency:Kerui is a 133, and the strength is the same as that of 1156's x3450

The i7 970 runs close to 3930K. 、That's it.,The game is not as good.。

If you want to compare it with the mainstream, it is probably around the i3 9100. There is mainly hyper-threading, which in some cases performs better than the i3 9100.