Hart s Theory of the Relationship between Law and Morality Law is law, not morality

Law and morality are mutually reinforcing. Morality provides guidance to the law, and law is a manifestation of morality. However, there is a difference between the two, they are not the same in scope, breaking the law does not necessarily violate the moral bottom line, and if there is a problem with moral thinking, it does not necessarily violate the law.

The origin of law and morality and the time of existence are different, the form of the two is not the same, the form of expression is also different, morality is based on people's cognition, but the law has certain clauses and constraints, which is mandatory.

The relationship between law and morality lies in mutual constraints, and in the case of complying with the law, we need to control our own moral bottom line, and we can also think of law as the minimum of the so-called moral bottom line.

As you know, the law is a red line that cannot be crossed, morality is the basic of a person, and as a normal person, there should be a certain moral bottom line.

The relationship between law and morality is mutually reinforcing, and law cannot be violated, but neither can morality.

It is agreed that the existence of the law is to make the operation of society more stable and safe, and the existence of the law is to prevent the occurrence of criminal incidents, and it is also the lowest bottom line of morality. After breaking the moral bottom line, it is equivalent to touching the law and will be severely punished by the law. For many people, the law is something that restricts their behavior, some people do not have criminal behavior, but they have criminal intentions, such people have a huge risk to social security, and the moral level cannot restrain them, only the law can firmly imprison their criminal intentions in the bottom of their hearts.

The law is a very crucial part of daily life, and once the law is used, it means that the nature of the case is very serious, and the law will not be used unless necessary.

For a very simple example, if a parent or uncle in a family has a criminal record, it will directly affect the child, and the child will be rejected for this reason when applying for the police academy in the college entrance examination. However, there are not many people with high moral level in society, and there are not many criminal incidents, which shows that many people's morality is only on the median line, and they occasionally have the intention of wanting to commit crimes, but they are forced by the threat of the law and the red line of inner morality to stop them.

There are also some people who constantly touch the bottom line of the law, wandering around the bottom line, the most classic is the gangsters, they don't fight, but they will intimidate people, let them hand over the protection money, even if they fight, they will not be ruthless, so they can only be detained in the police station for a period of time and then released, which often brings a lot of trouble to the police station and the merchants. The moral level of these thugs is obviously not high enough, and only the law can restrain them.

Morality is the highest level of law, people with high moral level do not need the law to restrain them, their own moral level is the biggest constraint, so it is a very important thing to improve the moral literacy of the whole people.

I agree. I think this statement makes a lot of sense. Everyone should take this sentence to heart. And strictly abide by their own laws and morals.

Personally, I still agree with it, because the law can only regulate some illegal and criminal things, and there are many places that are not taken into account, and those who have no morality will not care about these, and those who have morality will not violate the law.

I very much agree that the law is used to protect oneself from being harmed by immoral behavior, so as long as you are moral, you can also control yourself well.

It should be like this, morality can be a good constraint on a person, and it is equivalent to the law in everyone's heart, which can be viewed in this way.

I agree with this view, because the law is the lowest moral bottom line, and those who touch the law should be punished.

Answer] :d d [Analysis] Whether in terms of depth or breadth, the adjustment range of Daopinzhou Sande is deeper and wider than that of the law of loss.

The relationship between law and morality is mutually reinforcing, mutually beneficial, and mutually promoting.

Law is the legalization of morality; The relationship is embodied in the fact that the law is an effective means of disseminating morality.

Differences and Manifestations of Ethics and Law:

1. Law is an effective means of disseminating morality.

Morality can be divided into two categories: the first is the morality required by social order, that is, the minimum morality that is indispensable for a society to survive, such as not violently harming others, not using fraud to seek rights and interests, and not endangering public safety; The second category includes principles that contribute to improving the quality of life and fostering close relationships between people, such as fraternity and selflessness.

2. Morality is the evaluation standard and driving force of law.

It is a useful supplement to the law. First, the law should contain a minimum of morality. A law without a moral basis is a kind of evil law, and it cannot be respected and consciously obeyed by people.

Second, morality has a guarantee effect on the implementation of the law. Benevolence is not enough for government, and law is not enough for oneself. The enhancement of the professional ethics of law enforcers and the strengthening of the legal awareness and moral concepts of law-abiding personnel all play a positive role in the implementation of the law.

Third, Dao Eggplant Omits Argument has a complementary effect on the law. Moral adjustment plays a complementary role in those that are not suitable for regulation by law, or that should be regulated by law but cannot be relied upon due to the lag of legislation.

3. Ethics and law are transformed into each other in some cases.

Morality, which emerges as society develops, is considered to be very important to society and is in danger of being violated on a regular basis, and it is possible for the legislator to incorporate them into the law. Conversely, certain conduct that was previously considered unethical and therefore prohibited by law may be withdrawn from the legal field and turned into a moral adjustment. <>

law and morality; the law of the law, the bearing of the Tao; Leaving aside the law of law, the way of morality, and the law and virtue remain. Law: All things have their commonality, and this commonality is the law.

And the law, the commonalities in the rule of law, these commonalities make up the law. Virtue: It is the degree to which a person can carry, bear the responsibility, bear the pain, and so on.

And the stuffy stuff that carries it can get out of a way, is for morality. Morality does not matter about commonality, it can be a person, but it is also the cause of a group of people who can be together.

Therefore, derived. Law and morality are closely related, but distinct. Heaven is always in the shadow of heaven, and the earth is always earth.

There are days and nights, cloudy and sunny, hot and cold; There are four seasons in the land, and the vicissitudes of the sea. There is no such thing as a perfect world.