Knowledge about cloning no more than 200 words .

First, blood reproduction constitutes the social structure and social relations. Why different countries and different races are almost against human cloning, the reason is that this is another mode of reproduction, and now the issue of child education in single-parent families has attracted much attention, that is, to pay attention to an emotional cultivation problem, human growth is completed in the state of sexual reproduction and parenting, and it has been like this for thousands of years, the emergence of cloned human beings, how should society deal with it, and what should be the relationship between cloned human beings and cloned human beings?

Second, it is difficult to distinguish between identity and social rights.

In human cloning research, if there is an anomaly, the defective clone cannot be disposed of at will like a cloned animal, which is also a problem.

It feels like someone being able to eat something downstairs in my house.

The pros outweigh the cons.

First, "cloning," as a new means of science and technology, is the inevitable product of the development of science to a certain stage, and it marks the arrival of a new stage of development of human science and technology, and it provides an important technical means for human beings to explore the mysteries of life and study the laws governing the occurrence and development of life.

Second, "cloning" technology has great practical value in the protection of precious and rare animals and medicine. It is entirely possible to use this technique to breed endangered animals in large numbers so that their species do not become extinct.

Third, "cloning" is a kind of science and technology, and since mankind can master it, it must have a way to control it and will not allow it to harm human society. Therefore, there is no need to talk about the discoloration of "cloning", and regard "cloning" as a flood beast.

Fourth, the "cloning" technology is a great milestone in medicine. Humans can use "cloning" technology to replicate human organs to replace their own crippled or dysfunctional organs, or to make up for missing organs of human beings. Since the replicated organ** is in its own somatic cells, the phenomenon of "allogeneic rejection" can be minimized.

Fifth, from a biological point of view, man belongs to the animal kingdom and should coexist with other creatures on an equal footing. Since the use of animals for experiments is allowed, human civilization has developed to the point where it is highly developed today, and the use of human beings for experiments should not be completely prohibited. Humans should approach this new thing with a calm mind and gradually get used to it without making a fuss.

Theoretically speaking, the genetic material of the "cloned" animal or human being is completely consistent with the mother's, but due to the mother's nutritional status, ontogenetic development process and growth environment, and the different education, the "cloned" animal or human being cannot become a copy in the complete sense, especially the "cloned" person, who will have a different ideology and way of thinking from his mother. So "cloning" is just a biotechnology, not a "human copier".