Ask for recommendations, Nikon D3100 and Pentax kr

Recommend D3100+18 105 lens, don't want a set lens, it's basically useless.

Just purchased D3100 + AF-S 18 105 VR ED (Department of D90 set of lenses), a total of 5200, including 1600 lenses, 18 55 heads without kit, 18 105 can basically let novices go the world with a lens, wide angle and medium telephoto are covered to the fuselage without a motor, it doesn't matter, the fuselage motor is also slow sound, the lens is super silent and the motor is fast and the sound is light, as long as the AF-S lens can achieve autofocus, Such shots start from 500 yuan and are available at all levels.

D90 is actually a good machine, but digital products are updated too quickly, D90 has a lot of backward technology, digital products buy new not buy old, not to mention D90 sets of machines are not cheap, basically above 6500.

The 550D is really powerful, but it is not so fast for novices to get started, the Canon machine shoots the color is light, and post-processing is required, and the D3100 has a guide mode, which is very suitable for new students to get started.

Attached is a ** that was just shot with D3100 today.

I have Pentax Nikon dual major, have Nikon D200 and Pentax K20D. (The following references** are all RMB).

The Nikon D3100 is good and good for getting started. The upgrade can be equipped with low-end lenses such as 55-200 VR telephoto and 35 fixed focus, and the image is good. If you need to embark on the road of professional photography in the future, you need a high-end zoom head, a fast focusing speed, a powerful large aperture telephoto, a powerful wide-angle zoom and a full-frame body, and you don't care about investing a lot of time in post-processing, choose D3100,,, Nikon's imaging characteristics are large overall contrast, high sharpness, poor dark details, poor local contrast, the shooting will be very eye-catching, and the color is generally considered to be inferior to Pentax.

The Pentax KR has the best performance among the entry-level machines, but it is also slightly more expensive.

If you want to play worry-free, Nikon D3100 is a good choice, and if you want to play with a toss, Pentax KR is far more fun than Nikon.

Auto lens autofocus is generally not as fast as Nikon, but the old-fashioned manual head is extremely compatible, and metering and body stabilization can be achieved with any lens. It can be equipped with domestic lenses, such as Phoenix, Huaguang and other headers, **150-300, of which Phoenix can buy new ones, but Huaguang imaging is better. In fact, the original manual head ** is not high screw super Takumar 50 and S-M-C TAKUMAR** about 600-800, the imaging is very good, the bayonet manual head has M50 F2, more than 300, M50, more than 600, M50, more than 800, more than A50 800, more than A50 1200, etc., it should be noted that the use of manual head requires a certain photographic foundation, choose carefully.

The cheap automatic lenses are DA 35, more than 1000, telephoto dal 50-200, more than 800, and DAL 55-300 more than 1200. Wait a minute.

Pentax imaging characteristics are generally considered to be good sharpness, moderate contrast, transparent and natural color, direct jpg image has a good effect, and the later stage is relatively worry-free.

If you are not afraid to use fixed focus and do not want to be powerful, choose Pentax KR.

D3100 is the most cost-effective entry model, and I only recommend D3100 for entry SLR, because the entry SLR imaging is almost the same, some products may have more fancy functions such as rotating screens and large-resolution LCD screens, which are not necessary, and Nikon's low-end body and lens are much more generous than Canon!

Don't choose a DSLR other than Canon, Nikon, or Sony, because there are two criteria for choosing a brand to buy a SLR: one is to have a rich lens group. In this way, when you enter the SLR, you will not find that some important bulls do not have their own fuselage mount models.

The second is that this manufacturer must have a full DSLR. There may be some people who don't quite understand and agree with it. My explanation to you is:

The first is convenient for you to upgrade in the future, and the second is that this symbolizes a kind of strength of the manufacturer, often with a full set of SLR manufacturers, the speed of updating the follow-up models is faster, and the improvement of performance is more guaranteed. After all, a full DSLR can be done, so what's so difficult about an APS format SLR? In fact, it is foreseeable that all manufacturers that do not own full-frame SLRs will eventually slowly withdraw from the SLR market.

Although Pentax has a bit of a lens group, the full DSLR has been vacant. The speed of the release of the DSLR is also far from comparable to that of Canon, Nikon, and Sony. I won't say anything more, otherwise someone will throw me to death