Let s talk about what you think about the leader who has been saying bad things about the employees

This kind of leadership belongs to no quality, there is no authority, is unconvincing, if a leader feels that his employees are not doing well, he can directly point out to employees, there is no need to say bad things about employees behind his back.

This is something that people who don't have the skills to do.

If the leader has been saying bad things about the employees behind their backs. In fact, it violates the basic moral standards of being a human being. If there is such a leader in real life, it should be said that he is not worthy of being a leader.

They do not have the basic conditions to be a leader, or at least they do not have the basic qualities that a leader should have. The basic qualities of a leader should at least have: the character of integrity; unite the virtues of comrades, and have self-knowledge; the enterprising spirit of continuous innovation; Ability to work decisively; Tolerant demeanor.

If the leader has been saying bad things behind his back, this behavior is inappropriate, there is no identity, if the leader's character is not a problem, then it means that this is his behavior defect shortcomings, treat the problem, he chose the wrong way to express, at this time you might as well find a suitable opportunity to communicate directly with the leader; On the contrary, if there is a problem with the character and the conduct is not right, this behavior is revenge, a villain, this kind of leadership must not be avoided, or you have super strength to fight back.

No matter whether the leader is good or bad, when you hear them talking about you behind their backs, you can first look for problems from yourself, see what they are actually doing, bow down and reflect on yourself, and if you don't, you will be encouraged, and it will always be smooth sailing in the workplace. It is also a good thing for the leader to give you advice, stand tall and look far, maybe I hope you will grow up quickly and reuse you.

If there is really this kind of leadership, then obviously he does not play the role of correct guidance in the team, use his time with the leader to make self-judgment of the true intention of the leader, if the leader is usually a good person, is casual then said, then you have to find a suitable opportunity to communicate, communication is an effective way to solve the problem; If your leader is not usually very good, it is recommended to sink yourself, work hard to improve yourself and do a good job, and don't pay too much attention to it, so that there is no reason for him to want to say it.

Leaders play a role model in the team, and their words and deeds have an important impact on the team's cultural construction. If the leader speaks ill of others behind his back, it will cause a sense of distrust within the team, do you think he is also talking about me? The leader's behavior in front of the person and behind the back will make everyone wary, and it will be difficult for everyone to be 100% engaged in work.

And sooner or later, what the leader says behind his back will reach the earphones of the person being said, and how will he respond to the leader? Trouble will ensue.

Not everything happens what we see on the surface, often we need to find out, it may be that you make a mistake often, maybe the leader happens to be under pressure, think about the people around you who are not helpful. The thing itself is always two-sided, sometimes we need to analyze in many aspects, if it is indeed a leadership quality problem, you can find a way to remind, it is really fruitless or you can make another plan, of course, you can not take it seriously.

Explain that we do have our own shortcomings, will leave others to speak, we have to calm down, first from our own to find the root of the reason, as the saying goes, flies do not bite seamless eggs, we must make up for our own shortcomings, correct our own mentality, do a good job of ourselves, do not leave a handle for others, strict high standards for ourselves, do the work in front.

Our party will not appoint such leadership, and the people do not need such leadership. If there is such a leader, please correct it immediately, strengthen your study, and get rid of your mistakes, otherwise, the people will spurn you and the employees will curse you.

For this kind of leader, I don't think he is worthy of being a leader, because he doesn't have a certain leadership ability, and people who can be leaders will never speak ill of employees behind their backs.

If you meet such a leader, leave the company quickly, as a leader the most important thing is temperament, absolutely not stingy, too small a leader has no future.

There may be certain deficiencies, so that the leader has an opinion, if it is made out of nothing, everyone knows what kind of person you are, then don't pay attention to it.

This kind of leadership is generally relatively negative, and it is not what a leader should be.

The overall quality of such a leader is not very high, and it is really depressing, so it cannot be classified as a good leader, but whether it is worth following depends on other factors, including one's own career plan.

I have seen that many leaders have also brought a lot of subordinates, and I hope it will help you with the following suggestions for sorting out this problem.

Look at the merits of leadership

As an employee to say bad things about people is a sign of poor quality, and as a leader to do this, of course, it is not advisable, but people under the eaves first learn to bow their heads, since he is like this to everyone, but it is not a big deal, the most afraid is to say bad things about you, not to say other people's words, this is equivalent to denying you. It is important to look at what strengths or strengths there are in leadership that can help you.

Look at your own shortcomings

Take a good look at yourself and don't leave your job at every turn. Everyone will have their own leader, but the probability of being able to meet a good leader is very small, so don't choose to leave just because you meet a bad leader, maybe you will meet a worse leader after leaving. Look at your own shortcomings and what you need to learn.

If an individual has a lot to learn, then he has to stick to his post and continue to work hard, assuming that his wings are very hard, and he can find a double job and a higher level when he goes out, then why stay? So the focus is not on the leader, but on the individual.

Look at the opportunities outside

The best job change should be based on personal career planning, not simply the cooperation of business leaders or other colleagues, so plan your career, always pay attention to external opportunities, and choose the opportunity to choose the right time to change jobs. If the external conditions do not have the strength of the individual and the strength is relatively weak, you can only sink down and work hard and improve with your heart.

Hearing some bad words will definitely affect your emotions, and the most you need to do at this time is to mediate your emotions, distract yourself, do something to make you happy, and feel good before you can think rationally.

In this case, I will communicate with the leader and tell him that this is not the same as the actual situation at all, and if this happens next time, I will choose the way of legal prosecution.

Whether it is a leader or a colleague, as long as you speak ill of you in front of others, you must not save face for such people. Be sure to expose his lies in front of others.

Hello, if you say bad things about me in front of other people, you must not talk back to the leader, you can improve your value and make yourself useful.

You may make a rebuttal, and if you hear this, you may immediately get angry and be ready to resign.

When this happens, I will go to the leader's office to communicate accordingly, and I hope that the leader will not do this, otherwise I will feel very disgusted.

If the leader always says bad things about you behind your back, then he must have an opinion about you, or he doesn't pay attention to you to say so. So it's better not to pick it up and have a conflict with him. You should do your job well through your own efforts and prove yourself.

You must know that since you can get this news, it means that he has talked about your bad things when talking about you. But he didn't correct you face-to-face, indicating that the relationship with you is relatively distant. If this happens, I think the best thing to do is not to have a head-on confrontation with him, and it is the best choice to be able to transfer and leave.

Let's take a look at why leaders behave in this way. <>

Under normal circumstances, if the leader attaches importance to you, he will choose to point out your problems in person and give some opinions and opinions. Even if the leader has no way to prove some of your faults for technical reasons. But at the very least, pointing out mistakes to your face is more formal than speaking ill of them behind your back.

And you also have to consider why the leader is talking bad about you in front of others behind his back, which is clearly belittling you. If this is the case, you need to give your opinion to it in person and ask if you are doing a bad job. Don't be a legend at this time, because the weaker you are, the more the leader will bully you.

And then from the perspective of purpose, why should leaders do such a thing? He was probably spreading a message or an opinion. Because when others hear the leader's evaluation of you, they will gradually spread the news within the company, and many people's views of you will change.

When you're executing a project, you'll find that you're getting more and more resistant because a lot of people know that your leaders don't look favorably on you. Naturally, you are not very important either, which makes it difficult for your project to move forward. <>

So I think the best choice for such a leader is to leave the position, if the company is relatively small, it is to leave the company. If the job position has been fixed and it is not easy to adjust, then you need to gradually do your own work at this time. The first thing to do is to make the people around you suspect that the leader's statement is wrong, and then let the leader slowly change his opinion of himself.

The boss may be overthinking about some things. For example, the company's finance and business will win a cash reward of 500,000 yuan for the company, and the boss will give 3,000 to finance and 10,000 yuan to business. This is where the contradiction begins.

Some employees are certainly not happy. Then why don't you give 6500 each? Let everyone be happy, thank the boss for not knowing why, and can't guess the boss's wishes at will.

For example, if I say the wages at the bottom, the situation outside, then I will do my salary work, which will lead to a sharp decline in efficiency and a chain reaction among employees. It's super bad. If the salary is low, you can apply for a ** salary, but you can't resign and find it again.

Employees just complained. Employees just complain in their mouths, but they still work hard in their hearts, which can only be used as a way for them to vent their evil anger and then work hard. Employees think completely differently than bosses.

Employees only think about how much money I can get. There aren't many employees who have a sense of ownership. The boss thinks about how to make money for the company and whether the employee's work is worthy of my salary.

As a result, the interests of the boss sometimes conflict with those of the employees. But it's not easy for employees to understand the boss, and it's not easy for the boss to understand the employee.

It's normal for the boss to be scolded, but such an employee is angry and pitiful, and you are not happy. Whether the leader is good or not, everyone's evaluation criteria are different, and the opinions of superiors and subordinates are also different. Being supported by 60% is a competent leader, and being supported by 80% is a good leader.

A leader, for the benefit of the majority, may offend 20% of the people, and these 20% may scold him or even hate him. Being 100% good is not necessarily a good leader, but it is not necessarily a bad leader either. No matter how good the leader is, he is not a god.

No one is perfect. There are always mistakes. It is normal for someone to say behind his back that the leader scolds the leader.

The leader is good, but there are still people who speak ill of him behind his back.

This seems to be a paradox. In fact, it is in line with human nature. First, say that people are good.

Although the ancients advocated self-cultivation and said that "people do not pass on their words, people often think with meditation", but they also told people that "there are no ancients before and no one after them". This shows that people in reality like to say that people are not. Second, be jealous.

Everyone has a jealous heart. Leadership is above all else, and most of them belong to smart people, who are bound to be envied and criticized. Third, people are not sages.

The ancients said that not everyone is a saint! Since there is, as a leader, it is natural not only to judge the merits and demerits of future generations, but also to be hotly discussed by contemporary people. It doesn't matter how great the work is, or how cute the person is, half of them appreciate you.

It can be seen that it is really normal for us to be gossiped about, even if we are ordinary people. The only thing we can do, and what we should do, is not to live in other people's mouths and not to care too much about other people's opinions.

Personally, I think the main reason is because, as a company leader, you need to take into account the overall situation, it is impossible to make every employee satisfied, it is impossible to be perfect, and there will be a lot of unfairness in this world, mainly depending on what kind of mentality we look at the problem, and everyone's views and attitudes towards the problem are different, so there will be this phenomenon.

Because among all the subordinates of every leader, there are always some people who hate their superiors in particular, and this situation is very normal.

Because they are in a relationship between management and management, there is a conflict of interest, and there will be a contradiction between the two.

Because this is the norm, the leader is dignified, and he will always not take into account the emotions of his colleagues, and because of the high pressure of work, there is a lot of work assigned to the employees below, so he will naturally be complained about.