For example, a policy in the United States supports and opposes those two parties, more specifically

Of course, it is the interests and the philosophy of governance and the policy of international issues.

The Democratic Party, the Democratic Party was supported by the big bourgeoisie from the beginning, the main supporters of the Democratic Party before the Civil War were the big bourgeoisie and plantation owners (slave owners), the Republican Party is inclined to the civilian class, both parties in the modern United States are the spokesmen of the bourgeoisie, the Democratic Party is still inclined to the big bourgeoisie, and the Republican Party is slightly inclined to the civilian class.

It is difficult to say that the United States of two hundred years ago is so different from the American society of today, there were problems then, and there are problems now.

The "policies" of the United States are all used to solve the specific problems it faces, not the ideological criteria for dividing camps, and when the problems are solved, the policies will change, and if the problems cannot be solved, the policies will have to change even more.

For example, the Republican Party seems to favor the rich, but its main supporters are inland farmers, and the Democratic Party should be inclined to the poor, but its main supporters are white-collar workers in large coastal cities.

Jefferson was the most opposed to centralization, similar to the Republican Party, but he was also one of the most committed to expanding territory, which is much like the Democratic Party.

If we look at the main disagreement at the time--- who was more important, federal rights or state rights, then Jefferson was clearly closer to the Republican Party, and Adams was undoubtedly the representative of the Democratic Party.

Basically, when it comes to U.S. domestic affairs, the Republican Party prefers the rule of inaction, while the Democrats advocate "yes, we can!" ”

There are three groups of people who pursue foreign policy in the United States today: those who were injured in the Vietnam War and advocate "getting rid of all conflicts"; On the other hand, those who were injured in the Gulf War advocated "participating only in wars in which victory could be guaranteed by using only naval forces." Albright belonged to the third faction, advocating "an immediate solution."

To put it simply, she thinks the United States will do whatever it wants.

In this issue, we will talk about the major diplomatic strategies of the United States in the 100 years since independence. When we look at the United States now, we always feel that it wants to control everything in the world. However, you must know that when the United States first became independent more than 200 years ago, it was an "isolationist" diplomacy, that is, not to get involved in the affairs of other countries, to maintain neutrality, and not to align with each other.

After World War I, Congress did not approve membership in the League of Nations, and before World War II, Congress passed the Neutrality Act.