Why is it rumored that only evolving human fossils have not been found?

Because fossils take a long time to form, and human beings have lived on the earth for too short a time to form fossils.

How could it not be discovered, what is the Yuanmou man, what is the Peking man, isn't this the human fossil found, and then we think of how human beings evolved step by step.

Regarding the theory of evolution, I am sure that many people, especially religious people, will question it, and the question is why we can't find evolved humans? This question does blind some people who believe in evolution. Yes, because the theory of evolution says that humans evolved from apes, there must have been people who are still evolving, so why haven't they been found?

For this question, we must first understand the theory of evolution.

Fossils of humans and dinosaurs can be found, but why can't we find fossils of humans in evolution?

In fact, it is not just the degree of confusion, but that fossils and theories are on the opposite side of evolutionary theory.

First, the fossil evidence presents a characteristic: each according to its kind. There is no such thing as an evolutionary "intermediate species", and fossils were Darwin's greatest hope of evidence for his theory.

Secondly, there are many "living fossils", but the problem is that there is no trace of evolution between the so-called ancestors and grandchildren who are separated by hundreds of millions of years.

And then there's the question of fossil formation. Fossils cannot be formed naturally and slowly, because corpses can only decompose and decompose, not fossils. On the contrary, it must be instantaneous, and the instantaneous catastrophe will bury the living creatures to form fossils.

Judging from the fossils of some vertebrates, this disaster should be a flood, because many vertebrate fossils are anti-arch, which is a manifestation of suffocation. The question of fossil formation makes geological chronology meaningless, because fossils are formed instantaneously, so statements such as "a certain fossil was found in a certain formation, so how many years ago is the formation" becomes pure speculation.

In fact, the fossils show their own kinds, as well as the instantaneous process of formation, suggest a more plausible possibility: that life came from the creation of supernatural intelligence.

The evidence of fossils is a fatal blow to the theory of evolution, and it can be said that one of the main reasons for disproving the theory of evolution is fossils.

First of all, fossils are an unavoidable problem in evolutionary theory. Because Darwin based the evidence for this theory on the hope of fossils. So, those who argue that no fossil evidence can support evolution are contradictory.

Second, fossil evidence shows that life is of its own kind. To date, countless fossils have been discovered, all of which have been of their own kind. There are no intermediate transitional lives.

Thirdly, on the contrary, "living fossils" are found from time to time, which brings a heavy blow to the theory of evolution. Because compared with the so-called tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of years apart, there is no change and no evolution!

In addition, the billions of years on which the theory of evolution is sustained are also questioned. Because there is more and more evidence that the earth is young.

For example, the eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 created a huge amount of sedimentary rock in a short period of time, and these rock formations were thought to have been formed over a period of millions, if not tens of millions, in the past.

Finally, molecular genetics concludes that humans all over the world have a common male ancestor and a common female ancestor. This does not give the theory of evolution any room.

In summary, life is clearly created by intelligent supernatural beings.

Fossils have long been considered the most direct and powerful evidence for the study of evolution. But not all traces of age can be explained by fossils. So there is evidence for comparative anatomy, cellular and molecular biology.

There was a gap in the theory of biological evolution, between Australopithecus and Ape-Man.

Because the origin of human beings is not as early as that of dinosaurs, there are some changes that occurred on the earth when human beings originated, so there are no fossils.

Because dinosaurs appeared much earlier than humans, humans are likely to be eaten by some animals after death, and the corpses are basically non-existent.

200 million years ago, the earth had a glorious era. Although not as prominent as today's high-tech civilizations, the natural ecology was extremely prosperous because it was ruled by a group of powerful animals, and these animals are what we call dinosaurs today. At that time, dinosaurs were at the top of the food chain.

Perhaps Darwin's survival of the fittest, the law of elimination of the fittest, can perfectly explain the characteristics of this era.

1. But no matter how strong life is, there will be a day of destruction, a day 65 million years agoThe planet has undergone significant changes. With the exception of a few lucky marine species, all other organisms became extinct in this catastrophe. Scientists can't be sure of what was going on at the time because they didn't have any physical research.

What is this change. Fortunately, with the continuous progress of science and technology, all walks of life in the world have developed rapidly, which involves the archaeological industry. With the help of advanced scientific and technological instruments, relevant experts have discovered dinosaur fossils, which were left by nature to future generations 60 million years ago.

2. But readers, have you ever thought about this question?Why have we only found dinosaur fossils and not human fossils so far, cremation is a means that has only appeared in modern times. In ancient times, burial was usually the main method. From the point of view of common sense, it is similar to the environment in which dinosaur fossils were produced.

Why there is no news of paleontological fossils.

3. In fact, scientists discovered this when they first excavated dinosaur fossils. At first, they were puzzled and invited several renowned medical scientists to conduct research and analysis. The experimental results show that the reason why the ancient body did not form a mineralized state is:

Human bones are much more fragile than dinosaurs, susceptible to external forces, difficult to preserve, when the ancients were buried, the environment was not completely closed, and the dinosaurs became extinct, the earth has undergone great changes, there is a big difference between the two. Many people wonder why dinosaurs were so powerful that they ended up being extinct. This may be contrary to Darwin's theory of biological evolution.

No living thing is always in the process of evolution, and no living thing lives in reincarnation and eventually dies.

In fact, the reason why only dinosaur fossils have been found, but no human fossils have been found, is that human bones are much weaker than dinosaurs, and they are easily affected by external forces.

The texture of human bones is much weaker than that of dinosaurs, and they are susceptible to corrosion by external forces, making it difficult to preserve; Secondly, the environment was not completely closed when the ancients were buried, and the extinction of the dinosaurs on the earth was due to major changes, which is very different.

Maybe it's because we didn't produce humans when the dinosaurs were there, and we were just apes.