What does it mean that sin is in the present generation, and merit is in the future ?

Is the phrase "sin in the present generation, merit in the future" correct? In fact, specific problems should be analyzed in detail, and it is difficult to distinguish between right and wrong based on this sentence alone, and it is necessary to judge by events.

Personally, I think that in most cases, this sentence is wrong and a manifestation of shirking responsibility.

Because there is a very similar sentence opposite to this sentence, "The merit is in the contemporary, and the benefit is in the future", because as a person, the contemporary is in front of you, but no one can judge the Qianqiu.

In history, sin is in the present day, and there are two things that are good. One thing can be said to be Qin Shi Huang.

To build the Great Wall, one thing is Emperor Yang of Sui.

Construction of the Grand Canal.

When the Great Wall and the Grand Canal were built, a lot of manpower and material resources were used, and at the same time, they caused a lot of complaints, and they were also considered to be one of the important reasons for the final demise of the Qin Dynasty and the Sui Dynasty.

However, the construction of the Great Wall and the Grand Canal has played a great role in later generations, and some people even say that the Grand Canal of Emperor Yang of Sui laid the foundation for the strength of the Tang Dynasty, so some people call it "the sin is in the present and the benefit is in the future".

But is that really the case? Personally, I don't think so.

The crux of this matter lies in whether it is necessary to "sin in the present generation" when doing things that are "beneficial for a thousand years", and whether this matter can really be imminent. Does it have to be done in a short period of time? In other words, it is necessary to spend so much manpower and material resources in a short period of time to accomplish this thing in the modern age.

As far as the construction of the Great Wall by Qin Shi Huang is concerned, in the history of the Qin State.

Zhao Guo, Yan Guo.

In order to resist the invasion of the Xiongnu, the Great Wall was built. The construction of these Great Walls did not cause a large-scale reaction, and Qin Shi Huang only connected the Great Wall of the Three Kingdoms, and the amount of work was much smaller, why it caused such a big repercussion, because the Great Wall of the Three Kingdoms was completed in hundreds of years, while Qin Shi Huang had to complete it in just ten years, which is the root of the problem.

The same is true for Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty to build the Grand Canal, the Grand Canal can indeed be said to be beneficial for a thousand years, but did Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty need to complete this project in just ten years? If Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty extended the time for the construction of the Grand Canal to several decades, then it would also be possible to achieve a beneficial result, but there would be no need to use so many people to provoke such a big resistance.

And whether it is the Qin State or the Sui Dynasty, there is a more critical problem that they have multiple big moves at the same time. For example, in addition to the Great Wall, there is also the Mausoleum of the First Emperor and the Qin Straight Road.

There is a spiritual channel. At the same time, it was also conquering Baiyue, and the Sui Dynasty was still making three expeditions to Goryeo.

It can be seen that they did this time not for any benefit.

If it is really good for a thousand years, then there is no rush for a while, and there is no need to pay the price of sin in the present day. Therefore, "the sin is in the present generation, and the benefit is in the future" If it is not something that does not need to die immediately, then it is actually incorrect, after all, the things of the thousand years need to be done by the thousand years, who can guarantee that a thing will still be beneficial after the thousand years.

Of course this is not true, because the work done by a person and the deeds he makes will be passed on to future generations.

This sentence is actually true in many cases, because when we usually do something, especially when we do big things, they are all wrong or wrong in the present, and in the eyes of future generations, they are actually great achievements.

No, I think it should be "the merit is in the present generation, and the benefit is in the future".

Summary. Wait a minute, kiss <>

What does it mean that "sin is in the present generation, and merit is in the future"?

Wait a minute, kiss <>

Hello dear, sin in the present refers to the exploitation of the present generation, the current generation has been exploited, and the hatred of the exploiter has arisen. Merit refers to the gratitude of future vested interests and exploiters to those who exploited their ancestors for them. [Bixin] [Bixin].

Pro, the sentence parsing method is as follows:1Start with the important words in the sentence.

2.Start by analyzing the structure of the sentence3Start by analyzing the position of the sentence in the text.

4.Start by analyzing the intent of the expression. 5.

Start by analyzing the context in which the sentence is located [compare the heart] [compare the heart].

There is not only such a thing as "sin in the present and merit in the future", but also "merit in the present and sin in the future". There is nothing ridiculous about this, it is just a matter of basic understanding.

Everything you like now is obviously not just the result of all the "good things" of the past, it is also the result of all the "evils". It is clear that everything you abhor now is not only the result of all the "evils" of the past, but also the result of all the "good things." Everything in the chain of cause and effect is tightly linked.

As a parent, don't think that everything you do should be counted innocent and that your child must be pardoned because you are confident that you will contribute to your child's future. In fact, the reason why so many children now have such a twisted hatred for sin is precisely becauseParents are using this logic to get away with it

It's a distortion that you don't want your children to have, because this obsession that in fact clearly disrespects the facts will greatly undermine their tolerance and cause them to miss out on a lot of so-called knowledge and skills in the rest of their lives. If you knew, how could you bear it? And you know it now.

It's just that the sin can't be washed away, and you can only assume that there will be "merit" in the future. Anyway, after a thousand years, everyone here is dead, and you have nowhere to complain to him.

It's just words. Trying to use the rationality of the future to cover up the irrationality of the present. But the future is unknowable, how do you know that there will be merit after a thousand years? What if "sin is in the present generation, and it will bring disaster to the future"?

So this is essentially a kind of fraud, a kind of spiritual opium, which makes you forget that you are a victim of the "sin of the moment", but substitutes yourself as a participant in the "work of a thousand years". - And then you will be very moved, and you will feel that you have suffered a very reasonable sin, and you can do more, and you will even scold the complaining people for why you are so ignorant.

This is from the level of facts, from the level of value, sin itself is something that cannot be pursued in modern times, and it is something that should be severely refuted. If this thing can be the standard of human behavior, then there is no argument to be found to prove the most sinful person. Secondly, this objective result is not the same as the subjective will.

Li Hongzhang, Qin Shi Huang, Yang Guang, Zhu Di, Lü Buwei, Wang Mang, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Cao Cao, Wu Zetian, etc.

Because many contemporary people do not understand what others do, they feel that it is a waste of money and labor, but in the future generations, it will benefit many people. It is most suitable for Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty, when the Grand Canal was built, it was scolded by the common people, but the Grand Canal brought a lot of convenience to future generations.

People say that Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty dug the Grand Canal is "the crime in the present generation, the merit in the future", the Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty to dig the Grand Canal can be said to be the labor and loss of money, many people are displaced, the wounded and the dead of death, but the Grand Canal has played an immeasurable role in the society, people's livelihood and economy of future generations.

I think Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty is one of them, although he was building a lot of construction at that time, using a lot of manpower and material resources to open the Grand Canal, but now the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal has indeed driven the economic development of the north and south of the Yangtze River for thousands of years.

This is the conclusion drawn from the perspective of the historical development debate, and although some people have made mistakes in the historical dynasty in which they lived, they are correct in the context of the whole history. It's better to use it on someone who has done something wrong.

Right! Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty spent a lot of manpower and financial resources to dig the Grand Canal, and the people were struggling to make a living, and many families were separated and their families were destroyed, which caused social turmoil and accelerated the demise of the Sui Dynasty. Hence the sin in the present day.

But in the long run, the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal connects the north and the south, and in the ancient era when there was no road, railway and air transportation, Cao Yun was able to transport materials from all over the country to Beijing in a timely manner, and promoted the economic development of various towns along the canal. At the same time, during the war years, troops could also be quickly mobilized by ship, which played a certain role in promoting social stability. Therefore, it can be said that the merit is in the future.

Yes, it does promote development.

The predecessors planted trees, and the descendants enjoyed the shade.

Although it is meritorious, it is also a 10,000-year-old stench, and a faint monarch is a faint monarch.