-
1.Referring to the scope: high score refers to a certain achievement within a limited range of disciplines, high energy lies in the comprehensive mastery between interdisciplinary disciplines, high score is a subset of high ability, high score is not necessarily high ability.
2.Essence analysis: high scores are biased towards the cultivation and reception of theories, and high energy is the practice and skillful use of actual combat.
There is a student with a level 6 certificate and a student with a level 4 certificate who is good at speaking, but it is not necessarily that the English ability of the higher level is strong.
3.Ways to achieve: diligence may be high-scored, high-energy not only requires diligence, but also personal hobbies, will, expertise, talent, experience, environment, etc., such as Newton's apple may be eaten in front of others, such as Gates who is out of school, they are not necessarily high-scored, they must be high-energy.
4.Development stage: high score is the foundation of high energy, is the primary stage of high energy, 5Counterargument: A high score must be high-energy, and the score is proportional to the ability, so everyone can improve their ability by burying their heads in the test.
Conclusion: High score is the foundation and component of high energy, high energy is the basis of high score inference and innovative application, therefore: high energy can be high score, high score is not necessarily high energy.
-
Scores focus on knowledge and ability on psychology, the former on learning and the latter on practice, and scores are not a sufficient condition for ability to impose cause and effect.
-
In my opinion, it is better to start from the aspect of what is high energy, find a more appropriate definition, that is, what is high energy, it is better to quote the words of celebrities, and rely more on moral character. And then what are the influencing factors that lead to high energy. The extent to which a high score can affect high energy.
How does a high score reflect high energy? Consider these aspects comprehensively, and then set a main line for you, just one sentence, which you can summarize after discussion. Focus on this at the beginning of the argument, and at the same time, the whole debate should focus on the key point you are finding.
As for examples, it's best not to take the examples around you, it's better to prepare examples from two aspects, on the one hand, people with high energy are not high-score winners, you can cite the well-known Bill Gates or something. On the other hand, people with high scores are not necessarily highly competent, so you can start from your surroundings and then look for more typical counterexamples in colleges and universities.
I can only offer these ideas, but I can talk about some experience, the key to the debate is not whether your topic is good to debate or not, whether it is advantageous, but whether you have a main line, and internalize the main line into your own things, repeatedly explain, repeatedly argue, and believe very much in what you are arguing about at the beginning, and affirm it. The second is not to rely on examples collected on the Internet, because you can also search for each other, and you must have your own things. The second is cooperation, and the unity of the debate is also the main content.
I believe you can succeed.
-
Opinions:1Fractions are concrete, singular concepts. Energy is an abstract and complex concept - > cannot be represented by fractions.
2.A high score is to achieve good results in learning, and high energy refers to a person's comprehensive quality and comprehensive ability (from China's test-oriented education to plain cavity vertical education for defense: high scores and high energy are relative, and high energy cannot be reflected with high scores).
3.From the perspective of the development of human history, there are many people in history who are not high-scoring and indeed high-energy, and the development of human beings needs great ability rather than points.
Cut the Gordian knot! I'd like to share my thoughts on what you've said. >>>More
From Nanjing Railway Station, take No. 13 to go up (Nanjing Railway Station - Nanhu), transfer to No. 134 to go down (Stone Town Park - Cotton Embankment) at Tuas Tea Pavilion to arrive at Lushan Road. Approx. km. >>>More
There is such a fable: The pig said that if I were to live again, I would be a cow, and although the work was tiring, it had a good reputation and made people love it; The cow said that if I was allowed to live again, I would be a pig, eat and sleep, sleep and eat, not exert myself, not sweat, and live like a fairy; The eagle said that if I were to live again, I would be a chicken, thirsty with water, hungry with rice, with a house and protected; The chicken said that if I were allowed to live again, I would be an eagle who could soar in the sky, travel all over the world, and hunt rabbits and chickens at will. It's an interesting phenomenon, and it's a sight to be. >>>More
。。Your love for him is too hot.
Try to calm yourself down. >>>More
1. I'm young and need your advice, but I don't need your guidance. >>>More