Why hit Goryeo, Goryeo of the Goryeo camp argued

Yuan Zheng Goryeo? The Tang Dynasty fought Goguryeo, a state made up of two different ethnic groups.

The fall of Goryeo was at the end of the Yuan Dynasty and the beginning of the Ming Dynasty (1388), when the king of Goryeo sent the commander Li Sung-gye to attack Liaodong. After Yi Chenggui went out of the Goryeo region, he launched a mutiny and successfully rebelled, and in 1392 he deposed the king of Goryeo in Kaesong, and the title of Goryeo was completely extinguished since then, and the title of the country was completely extinguished, and the title of the country was restored to the earliest title of the Korean Peninsula after King Wu of Zhou destroyed the Shang, and the regime established by the uncle of Emperor Xin (King of Shang) Jizi on the Korean Peninsula, known as the Jizi Dynasty in history, and the first country on the Korean Peninsula.

Both the Sui and Tang dynasties attacked Goryeo, but most of them failed.

During the reign of Emperor Wen of Sui, he sent an army of 300,000 to attack Goryeo, and finally retreated because he thought that the grain and grass were not crowded.

During the reign of Emperor Yang of Sui, he sent a million strikes to conquer Goryeo three times, but in the end, due to the unsustainable national strength, the defeat led to the destruction of Sui.

During the reign of Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin personally conquered Goryeo and failed.

During the reign of Emperor Gaozong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Zhi sent an army of 100,000 to exterminate Goryeo, and Goryeo was destroyed from then on.

In Chinese history, there have been many royal expeditions, but what is strange is that it stands to reason that the final result of the imperial expedition should be a great victory, but this situation rarely happens, which is really incomprehensible to Chinese history.

Let's first look at the Sui Dynasty, at that time, Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty made three expeditions to Goryeo, not only lost his troops and generals, but also eventually caused civil strife due to reckless military force, so that the country changed hands. Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty was a strong soldier, and he also drove a personal expedition to defeat Goryeo, but he was trapped in the "Oriental Xiaoyi" and had to return as a last resort.

In 611 AD, Emperor Yang of Sui decided to prepare troops to defeat Goryeo, preparing to turn the "land of barbarians" into a "land of crown belts".

The environment of Goryeo is relatively harsh, and the terrain there is not suitable for large-scale army warfare, so it can only be fought in small battles, and the city is more dangerous, easy to defend and difficult to attack, but it is really difficult to conquer...

It's enough to be a vassal country, there's no need to lose troops to conquer him. It can't beat us anyway, and the relationship is good.

That's because no one knows about it.

The Sui Dynasty fought Goryeo three times, and Tang Taizong of the Tang Dynasty also fought Goryeo.

In the field of Chinese historiography, there is a consensus that Goguryeo was a kingdom established by the ancient ethnic groups of Northeast China, and that Wang's Goryeo (founded in 918 AD), which is located on the present-day Korean Peninsula, are two countries that are very different from each other in terms of the main ethnic group and other aspects. However, scholars in South Korea disagree. Korean historians often believe that Goguryeo belongs only to its own history and has nothing to do with China, and they believe that the Goguryeo people created their own unique civilization and established a great empire on a par with ancient China.

His representative works include "History of the Goguryeo Empire" written by Xu Bingguo and "History of Goguryeo" written by Shin Ying-sik.

This is because Korean scholars have certain difficulties in interpreting ancient historical materials written entirely in Chinese. Therefore, the exchanges between China and South Korea in the study of Goguryeo history are also difficult. The main problem of Korean and Korean historians is that there is a tendency to arbitrarily distort historical materials for our own use.

The historical materials that can show the "independence" of Goguryeo in ancient history books are greatly highlighted, while the historical materials that can explain the political, cultural, and economic ties between Goguryeo and the Central Plains are deliberately ignored. He pointed out that among historians of the Korean Peninsula, this phenomenon is not isolated, but universal. The main problem of Chinese scholars in the study of Goguryeo history is "ivory tower doctrine".

Satisfied with the achievements made in a small circle, they have no motivation or willingness to take the initiative to show the latest Goguryeo historical research results to the public, so that many unreasonable historical understandings of Goguryeo have not been properly clarified on a larger scale, resulting in the erroneous historical understanding of the general public. Sell the manuscript.

The differences between China and South Korea on the historical understanding of Goguryeo exist objectively. We should not demand that either side be subservient. Instead, exchanges should be strengthened in line with the viewpoint that the truth is becoming clearer and clearer, so as to strive for an early resolution of this academic difference.

This problem can only be solved through academic exchange and not through any other means.