Why didn t the American Civil War produce national heroes?

Updated on history 2024-03-28
32 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The United States learned how to prevent civil war from the Civil War, and the Americans did it. One of the reasons for this was the tolerance of Grant at the moment of victory, in which he sacrificed his personal honor to win the permanent peace of a country. There are no official textbooks in the United States, no official censorship is required for the publication of historical works, and no one has the right to force the nation to indoctrinate a certain answer that is considered to be the only correct one.

    To General Lee and General Grant, who quelled the rebellion, the Americans paid equal respect. This is America. The fact is that General Lee became the dean of Washington College after the war, and he enjoyed a high social reputation, which is still remembered today, and his statue still wears the uniform of the Confederate army in his memorial tower at Washington College.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It is enough to bring down the US economy, but it is very difficult at present, because the United States is a way to make huge profits by issuing arms, and the military is very strong, and it is not easy to disintegrate, and people are provoking wars everywhere to sell ** to make money to block the mouths of the American people, and it is really difficult to deal with it for a while, as long as the United States is defeated, the United States and the economic chain can be disintegrated.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    There can be no emancipation without revolution and no change, and the emancipation of black slaves is nothing more than a movement. Because the American Civil War was a war between the main states of the United States of America, it did not recognize the secession of the southern states at the federal level, but was an action to maintain unity, and the South did not oppress the northern states, but only a secession movement, so it is only called a civil war, just like it is impossible to say that Chiang Kai-shek's attack on Henan in the Central Plains War is called the liberation of Henan, different interests are just appeals. The core of the Liberation War is that it completely broke the feudal land relationship and liberated the peasants under the feudal system, just like the industrial revolution liberated the concept of human productive forces.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The Emancipation Proclamation of Lincoln was not given to the great plantations in the South, and of course, they would not listen to it, because it would directly harm their interests, but why did Lincoln publish it as planned? We can think about it: 1, this can be said to be a declaration of war, the war is to be fought in the name of justification, and it is always necessary to find a reason, just like the rebel eye "Qingjun side", which everyone agrees with.

    2, the meaning of this declaration, is its other role, it is to damage the interests of the plantation owners and will not be recognized, but it is indeed the happiest thing for the black slaves, just imagine, as soon as the declaration is issued, the black slaves see that someone thinks about themselves and fights for them, then what will they do, of course, they pick up the hoe and beat their plantation owners, who did not dare to come forward before, now there is, it is strange not to resist. In this way, how could the war in the South be fought.3 The current situation in the United States at that time was that the North was a new bourgeois economy, and black slaves did not exist much, and it was the plantation economy of the South that was liberated. Therefore, it makes no sense to ask whether it is in force only in the north.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    In fact, the life of the black people in the south is good, the situation described in Uncle Tom's cabin is not the mainstream slave owners' attitude towards the black people is okay, at least the food and clothing are guaranteed, much better than the Irish, who really work in the northern sweatshops, the life is really not as good as the southern blacks, and for a long time, more or less integrated with the manor owner family, or willing to maintain the original life, "Gone with the Wind" is very clear.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The Civil War was about emancipating black slaves, and it was a pure ridiculous lie. Those who have watched Chaplin's movies know that Chaplin embodies the miserable life of the working class from an absurd and humorous artistic perspective, and it is obviously impossible to start a war shouting slogans to liberate blacks without enough food and clothing, so the question arises, what is the Civil War for.

    Lao Ma's point of view is undoubtedly correct, and economic problems are the root cause. At that time, the industry in the north of the United States developed rapidly, but both technology and cost were far inferior to the British factories, and even the British freight to the United States, the price was still lower than that of the American local goods, and the factory owners naturally hoped to increase tariffs to protect their industries, but the economic pillar of the South was the plantations, and the cost of hiring whites was too high, so the black slaves became the first choice, as long as they were fed, so the black slaves were not necessarily worse than the workers, at least the plantation owners had to let them have enough to eat, And the workers are absolutely not qualified to make demands there, and the capitalists can fire the workers at any time and pull a jobless homeless from the street at a lower price, and the unemployed are everywhere anyway. Off topic, the southern economy needs low tariffs, so that Europe can import their crops with low tariffs, and farmers can buy European industrial products at cheap prices, but this is undoubtedly intolerable for the north, everyone knows that industrial development needs markets and raw material origins, is there a better choice in the north?

    At this time, both the population and industrial strength of the North were far from being comparable to the vegetable gardens of the South, so Lincoln was elected, and no one in the South voted for Lincoln, but they all knew that Lincoln would definitely not be able to operate the vegetable garden when he came to power, so he declared his independence from the United States in accordance with the Constitution, but how could the North let the duck fly away, and if the legal means did not work, it would be forced, so the war began, At the beginning of the war, the South fought with great momentum because of the high quality of the army (the Federal Army was basically southerners, and they ran home to join the army as soon as the war began), but soon because of the lack of succession, it was finally defeated for several years.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Because the United States at that time was still based on the western coastal areas as the main plot, and the west had just experienced the westward movement and the purchase of Louisiana and other places, the core area of the United States was still the east, and the geographical difference was mainly between the north and the south. What's more, Richmond and Washington, the centers of the Confederacy and the Union, were close by, both on the east coast.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The American Civil War was the Civil War. Lincoln of the North advocated the emancipation of black slaves, and the South wanted to maintain slavery.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    At that time, the American West was sparsely populated and a desolate place, so naturally it did not cause disputes.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    internal affairs, do not want to mess with the United States. If you rashly participate, you may have a feud with the United States later.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    In the American Civil War, countless soldiers were killed in the war. At the end of the war, in order to pay tribute to the soldiers who died in the war, both north and south, they offered flowers to the graves of the dead on both sides in the spring, and they regarded this act as a symbol of national unity. Today, this has become a national sacrifice day, and the meaning is very similar to the Qingming Festival in China.

    Initially, Memorial Day (originally May 30, later changed to the last Monday of May) was used to commemorate all the war victims, but it gradually evolved into a common family to commemorate the deceased. On Memorial Day, active-duty military and veterans in the United States line up to cemeteries, especially the Arlington National Cemetery. People planted many crosses on the beach, and while laying wreaths to the martyrs, they also raised their heads to the sky and fired guns to salute the fallen soldiers, and sounded the lights out in the army, so that the dead soldiers could rest in peace and rest forever.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Yes, from a small thing.

    In one battle, the Northern Army lost 800 casualties, and the Southern Army suffered 2,000 casualties, and some people congratulated Lincoln** on the victory of the Northern Army.

    Lincoln said, "No, we have killed and wounded 2,800 brothers. ”

    Moreover, General Lee, a general of the Southern Army, was finally appointed president of General Lee College in Washington, D.C., so why doubt that there is such an inclusive atmosphere?

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Yue Fei is a national hero.

    Yue Fei (March 24, 1103 - January 27, 1142), known as Pengju, was a native of Tangyin, Xiangzhou (now Tangyin County, Henan Province). During the Southern Song Dynasty, he was a famous general, military strategist, strategist, national hero, calligrapher, and poet, and ranked first among the "Four Generals of Zhongxing" in the Southern Song Dynasty.

    Yue Fei was an outstanding commander of the Southern Song Dynasty, he attached great importance to the people's anti-Jin forces, and concluded the strategy of "connecting Heshuo", advocating that the civil anti-Jin rebel army north of the Yellow River and the Song army cooperate with each other to recover the lost territory;

    The "Yuejia Army" led by the army is known as "freezing to death without demolishing houses, starving to death without taking prisoners". Jin Jun has the comment of "shaking the mountain is easy, shaking the Yue family's army is difficult" to show his sincere admiration for the Yue family's army.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    For example, in the United Kingdom, when Wallace resisted the invasion of England, you can say that he was a Scottish national hero, but you cannot say that he was a British national hero.

    Now China is a multi-ethnic country.

    Yue Fei is defined as an anti-gold hero.

    In fact, many people did the same thing as Yue Fei before the Song Dynasty, such as Huan Wen and Liu Xu, they were all heroes who fought against the Five Hu and Sixteen Kingdoms, but why couldn't they get the title of national heroes?

    Is Yue Fei's anti-gold for the title of "national hero" If in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions, China includes the Han Dynasty, and Yue Fei is a hero of the Chinese nation, of course, if it is an exam, it is still a hero of the anti-gold.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    In the past, it was not wrong to say that the heroes of the famous nationality, I remember that in 2007, the history books only said that Yue Fei was a hero of the resistance to Jin, because now our country emphasizes the unity of the ethnic group, and they are all Chinese nations.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    It's a very simple question, Yue Fei can be said to be a patriotic general to resist the invasion of foreign enemies, but as a nation, the Jin people are also one of the pioneers of the Chinese nation, so the Liaojin War at that time was an internal contradiction of the nation. So Yue Fei is not a national hero. Just imagine if the Jin people are excluded, then the Manchus in our country are definitely not Chinese, and the Han, Mongolian, Korean, Xibe, Olunchun and other ethnic groups are more or less mixed with the blood of the Jin people, how can these people be counted?

    Hehe. The scope of the concept of the nation among the national heroes does not simply refer to a certain race, but to the category of the Chinese nation.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Because it was the Jin State that was at war with the Song Dynasty, not Russia, it was an internal contradiction of the Chinese nation. If it is a foreign nation, it can be called a national hero, just like Zheng Chenggong or Emperor Kangxi.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Hahahaha, because he thinks that he was forced out to protect everyone, and he had to do it as a last resort, so he can't rely on anyone, he can only rely on himself, and then no one needs him to rely on, so he is not a hero in the traditional sense (fighting for everyone's interests).

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Because Yue Fei accepted the dispatch of the Song Dynasty and suppressed the peasant uprising against the corrupt imperial court at that time!

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    National heroes refer to foreign wars, for example, Qi Jiguang is considered a national hero.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Heroes of the anti-gold resistance during China's civil war; National heroes refer to foreign wars, so Yue Fei is not a national hero, but a famous anti-gold general.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Yue Fei is not a national hero, the national heroes are Zhao Gou and Qin Hui.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    I remember when I was a child, I studied history, and my history teacher said that Yue Fei was not a national hero, and that a national hero was someone who resisted foreign invaders and protected his own nation from aggression, and at the same time did not suppress domestic national uprisings. Yue Fei suppressed Zhong Xiang Yang Mi's uprising, so he cannot be called a national hero.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    The history teacher said that Yue Fei is not a national hero, because Yue Fei is a person who fights against Jin (the Jurchen people, the Jurchen people are one of the 56 ethnic groups, not counting foreign invaders) and does not defend the independence, freedom and interests of their own nation, and is fighting against foreign aggression.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    During the high school entrance examination, the history teacher repeatedly emphasized... For the present ... He is not ...

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    In the Southern Song Dynasty, he was a national hero; But in today's context, in order to maintain national unity, official propaganda does not consider him a national hero.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Because the people who fought with him were also Chinese rather than foreigners, like Lin Zexu, who burned opium to resist Western imperialism, he was considered a national hero.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    A national hero refers to a foreign war.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    Because Yue Fei's resistance to Jin is a war between national brothers, that is, a civil war belonging to China; And the national hero refers to the foreign war, so Yue Fei is not a national hero, but a famous anti-gold general.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    At that time, the big countries were busy with their own affairs, and they didn't have time to care about the United States, Mexico was a garbage country, and the situation at that time was worse than that of the United States, was he capable?

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    Britain and France are allies of the United States, and Americans are British and French, and the racial composition of the post-United States is: white, Hispanic, African-American, Asian, Indian and Alaska, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander two or more races (multiracial). Among them, the total population of ethnic minorities such as blacks, Hispanics, and Asians in the United States has reached 100 million.

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    Count him lucky, everyone else is busy with the rest.

Related questions
22 answers2024-03-28

"There is no philosophy in China" is not a pejorative meaning. Strictly speaking, philosophy is exclusive to the Western cultural tradition, and Chinese philosophy does not need to be considered philosophy unless we use it in an analogical or figurative way. >>>More

6 answers2024-03-28

The history of mechanics is a branch of mechanics and a branch of the history of science, which describes and studies the history of human beings to understand and apply the laws of mechanical motion of objects from natural phenomena and production activities. The development of mechanics is roughly the same in terms of historical chronology and the logical order of disciplines, and this development reflects the process of gradual deepening of human understanding from simple to complex. The establishment of Newton's laws of motion was an important milestone in the development of mechanics. >>>More

3 answers2024-03-28

Silicon Valley is an important electronics industry base in the United States and the most well-known electronics industry concentration in the world. >>>More

15 answers2024-03-28

The reasons are manifold.

There are ideological factors, as well as factors of economic power, military strength. >>>More

16 answers2024-03-28

Why do domestic planes flying to the United States prefer to go around the North Pole rather than cross the Pacific Ocean? >>>More