Help me find some arguments and arguments factual arguments, theoretical arguments .

First, the methods are different.

1. Factual arguments: true descriptions and generalizations of objective things.

2. Taoist evidence: in order to demonstrate a certain issue or point of view to explain its correctness or error, some famous sayings, proverbs, ancient documents, etc. are cited to prove the material.

Second, the characteristics are different.

1. Factual arguments: have the character of direct reality, so they are the most convincing arguments to prove the argument.

Third, the content is different.

1. Factual arguments: Factual arguments include specific examples, summary facts, personal experience, etc.

2. Taoist evidence: it can be the process of analyzing and explaining the problem. It includes classic works and authoritative remarks (such as famous quotes, etc.), principles, laws, formulas of natural science, etc.

A factual argument is a true description and generalization of objective things, with the character of direct reality, and is therefore the most convincing argument to prove an argument. This is the saying that "facts speak louder than words". Factual arguments include specific examples, generalized facts, statistics, personal experience, and so on.

Taoist arguments refer to the materials that cite some famous sayings, proverbs, ancient documents, etc. to prove a certain issue or point of view in order to demonstrate its correctness or error, and generally refer to those that are in practice and have been proven and tested by long-term practice, and are judged to be correct, that is, to explain a problem by reasoning. It can also be the process of analyzing, explaining, and explaining a problem. It includes classic writings and authoritative remarks (such as famous quotes, etc.), classic or well-known examples, as well as principles, laws, formulas, etc. of the natural sciences.

Factual arguments are mainly based on true, universal things. Taoist arguments are mainly based on quoting some famous sayings and sentences with a certain amount of truth as arguments.

This is in the answer to the middle school Chinese question.

It is its narrow view that is applied.

That is, factual arguments are examples and facts, while rational arguments are authoritative quotes from famous people and laws of natural science.

But the example of a celebrity cannot be called a justification.

Hope I helped you.

1. Taoist arguments refer to the materials that cite some famous sayings, proverbs, ancient documents, etc. to prove a certain issue or point of view in order to demonstrate its correctness or error. Cracked.

2. Factual argument is the true description and summary of objective things, with the character of direct reality, so it is the most convincing argument to prove the argument, the so-called facts speak louder than words is this truth, factual arguments include specific examples, summary facts, statistics, personal experience, etc.

Arguments, arguments, arguments mean the following:

1. Arguments. The argument is the central point of an essay and the soul of the article. It governs the whole text, determines the choice of material and the method of argumentation. The argument must first be correct and clear, and secondly, it must be novel and profound.

In order to make the argument clear, we must have a clear idea before writing, which is the principle of writing first, to see whether our article has a clear point of view, it is necessary to see whether we can summarize the basic idea in one sentence after reading.

If these two points are not attained, it is difficult to make the argument clear. Some students' articles are gorgeous throughout, but after reading them, people don't know what the intention is, which must be a problem in refining the center or pointing out the point of view.

2. Arguments. Arguments are divided into: factual arguments and Taoist arguments.

Facts and arguments: Facts play a very obvious role in arguments, analyze facts, see the truth, and test whether it is logically consistent with the points of the article. (Representative examples, hard data, reliable historical facts, etc.). Factual arguments include examples and figures.

Taoist Arguments: Theories that are arguments are always familiar to readers, or are generally recognized by society, and they are the result of abstracting and generalizing a large number of residual facts. Theoretical arguments include famous aphorisms, proverbs, aphorisms, and the author's reasoning analysis.

3. Argumentation. There are several methods of argumentation:

Reasoning argument: Prove arguments with the incisive insights in the classic works of Marxism-Leninism, the famous sayings and aphorisms of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and the universally recognized theorems and formulas. (Function: Strongly argue the point of view and enhance the authority and persuasiveness of the article).

Comparative argumentation: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments and prove the argument in the comparison. (Function: Highlight the argument and make people impressive).

In addition, in the refutation, the method of "using the spear of the son and the shield of the attacker" and the "method of reducing the fallacy" are often adopted. It is often used in combination in the majority meeting.

Citation-argument: Quotation argument is more complicated, which is related to specific citation materials, including quoting famous quotes, aphorisms, authoritative data, celebrity anecdotes, jokes and anecdotes, etc., and its role should be analyzed in detail. For example, citing famous people, aphorisms, aphorisms, and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument.

Cites celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.