Which is better, Samsung Solid State or Kingston Solid State

As far as the brand is concerned, Samsung is the leader in the field of consumer SSDs, and it can independently develop the flash memory particles and main control of SSDs, and the quality and performance are not to be said. Kingston is the world's largest independent manufacturer of memory products, with the largest share of the memory market in retail. Although Kingston's SSDs use more flash memory chips and a master control system than other manufacturers, the quality is still trustworthy and it is cheaper than Samsung's SSDs of the same model.

If you have plenty of money and pursue high reliability, you should naturally buy a Samsung SSD. Otherwise, Kingston SSDs, which offer a better price-performance ratio, are recommended.

Samsung, Kingston and other manufacturers have launched a variety of SSDs with different performance, capacity, and interfaces, which vary greatly. In principle, try to choose a model with a large capacity, which can not only store more file data, but also mean a longer service life. As far as common interfaces are concerned, the performance of SSDs with PCIe, protocol) interfaces is better than that of SATA, M-SATA and bus) SSDs, and ** is also more expensive.

Summary: Not bad.

Kingston's SSDs are high-performance, secure and reliable. As we all know, Kingston is a veteran in the storage industry, with more than 2,000 storage products and trustworthy quality.

Founded in 1987 and headquartered in Fountain Valley, California, Kingston employs more than 2,400 people worldwide. Named "America's Best Companies to Work For" by Fortune Magazine.

Introduction:

In 1987, Kingston entered the market with a single product. In response to the severe shortage of surface-mount memory chips, Kingston founders Du Jichuan and David Sun designed memory modules and re-established the industry standard for years to come.

Kingston Technology combines one of the most extensive and rigorous testing processes in the memory industry.

1. The unique free technical support center and a steady stream of technological innovation have continuously established industry quality and reliability standards since its inception.

Kingston's international service network spans six continents and includes dealers, resellers, retailers and OEM customers. At the same time, the company also provides foundry and chain management services for semiconductor manufacturers and system OEMs.

Kingston SSDs are second-tier solid-state representatives, and because they do not produce particles, they need to be assembled and produced by various manufacturers, which is basically similar to its memory production model.

Garbage, I bought a piece, and it broke in two years.

Comparison of Samsung memory modules and Kingston memory modules:

1. Samsung and Kingston are both known for their good stability and compatibility;

2. Kingston pays more attention to compatibility, and does not hesitate to sacrifice performance to maximize compatibility. As a result, the speed is slightly slower, but the compatibility is the best;

3. Samsung's memory, which belongs to taking into account, while maintaining good compatibility, takes into account the performance a little, and the overclocking performance is better than Kingston in most cases.

1. Kingston's famous brand, the quality is guaranteed. But there are too many counterfeits, and I accidentally bought plum socks and dismantled them to fake ones.

2. Samsung is also a famous brand, but memory should not be the main business.

3. ADATA should be the best choice, a big-name professional.

Kingston mainly cooperates with Yinghao Wantel,ADATA mainly cooperates with AMD,The quality of memory is about the same,These two brands are relatively popular,Corsair and Xenopolar e-sports memory are good,Memory in addition to not buying miscellaneous brands, whoever buys cheaply is right,The bad record is very small, even if it is broken, it can be guaranteed, and it is basically to be replaced。

There are some differences between Samsung Solid State and Great Wall Solid State, and here are some of the possible differences:

1.Production process and technology: Widely regarded as one of the industry leaders, Samsung SSDs use in-house designed and produced controllers and flash memory chips, with an advanced 5nm process node for improved performance and reliability.

On the other hand, Great Wall solid-state has certain differences in the application of technologies such as hard disk control chips, and uses flash memory particles from manufacturers such as Hynix and Yangtze River Storage.

2.Product performance and**: Samsung's SSD is ahead of the Great Wall solid state in most performance indicators, for example, the Samsung 970 EVO Plus can reach a read and write speed of 3500 3300MB s, which is much higher than the read and write speed of the same model of the Great Wall SSD.

But relatively speaking, Samsung's solid-state ** is usually higher than Great Wall's products with the same performance.

3.Product line and market positioning: Samsung SSDs usually cover more stupid product lines and market segments, such as 970 EVO, 970 PRO, 860 EVO, 860 QVO, etc.

The Great Wall solid-state is relatively rare. In addition, Samsung's SSD has also launched a PCIe version of the 970 EVO, which can fully exert its scattered performance under the PCIe interface to meet the needs of the high-end market.

It should be noted that the above are only some of the possible differences, and any purchase decision needs to consider your actual needs and a comprehensive evaluation of the product's cost-effectiveness.

Samsung's memory is better than Kingston's

1. Stability

The stability of Samsung's memory is better than that of Kingston, which is less stable, while Samsung's memory is more stable. Kingston only focuses on product performance and ignores memory stability. Samsung's memory, on the other hand, takes into account both stability and performance.

2. Compatibility

Samsung's memory takes into account compatibility and performance compared to Kingston's memory, while Kingston's memory only takes into account performance and ignores compatibility. However, Kingston also has a product that takes into account performance, which is a separate series, called the HyperX series, which moderately improves the performance of memory while maintaining its own stable and compatible characteristics.

3. Overclocking performance

In the case of guaranteeing the compatibility and stability of the memory, Samsung's overclocking performance is better than that of Kingston, which has average overclocking performance, while Samsung's memory has very good overclocking performance.

4. Memory consumption

When running large software or games, Kingston consumes more memory and is more likely to cause the computer to lag, while Samsung consumes less memory and is smoother to use.

The memory of Samsung and Kingston is at the same level, and the quality is basically the same, both are very good quality memory.

1. Kingston is positioned for stability and compatibility, so the production capacity of the product is average, and the overclocking is average, but the stability and compatibility are the best.

2. Compared with Kingston, Samsung takes into account compatibility and performance, and on the premise of ensuring compatibility and stability, the overclocking performance is also good.

3. Kingston also has products that take into account performance, which is a separate series, called HyperX series, which moderately improves the performance of memory on the basis of maintaining its own stable and compatible characteristics.

The commonly used ones are Kingston's, and they're all fine.

It mainly depends on what motherboard you use Some motherboards still choose to use memory modules.

As long as your notebook is not Samsung's own, then choose Kingston, because Kingston is a specialized, professional storage device, with a very wide range of users and very good compatibility.

In fact, I despise the Japanese and Korean brands, they do everything, but they are inferior to others. For example, mobile phones, cameras, and computers are not as good as Nokia, Nikon, and HP, because if they are not "single-minded", they cannot talk about "professionalism". But the means are very bad, like Sony's mobile phone, which makes users pay for its immature memory technology in order to sell its own memory cards, so that the phone is not compatible with other memory cards.

If you buy its mobile phone, it will give you one, but if the memory card is broken, it can't be guaranteed like a mobile phone, so you can only buy its memory card.

Western Digital's SSD is good. Western Digital Green Drive SSDs performed very well in various tests, and SSDs far surpassed HDDs in terms of boot time, enhanced system response speed, and optimized storage operation speed.

The official data shows that the SSD has a sustained read speed of 540MB s, a sustained write speed of 405MB s, a random read speed of 37000 IOPS, a random write speed of 63000 IOPS, and a standby power consumption.

Solid-state drives need to ensure compatibility with different devices to ensure performance, and every WD Green SSD that leaves the factory has passed the WD Functional Integrity Test Labs (WD certification, and the HDDs launched by WD over the years have been WD certified, so it has a wealth of samples in terms of compatibility.

The main station.

Kingston is still an old brand, an international brand.

Good quality.

Some bad ones cannot be ruled out as counterfeit products.

There are many counterfeit products of these products.

Easy to get tricked, don't be greedy for cheap, don't buy the cheapest.

SSD, 1 to consider cost performance, 2 to consider compatibility.

The reason why Kingston's SSD is not good is because it uses SF's main controller. In my opinion, the SF master is a garbage, don't buy the SF master, the test data is not real, and the more you use it, the slower it gets.

The brands with better compatibility are Intel and Samsung.

The brands with better performance are Samsung, Puket, Micron, and OCZ.

Among these ones, the best ones are Samsung and Puket.

If it's a book, pay special attention to compatibility.

On the premise that compatibility is guaranteed, the best cost-effective ones are Samsung's 840EVO and Puket's M5S. The real speed is fast, not just the test data. That data can be faked.

I use the M5S myself.

In particular, it should be noted that almost all of these disks that are not SF masters have a common feature, that is, the capacity is related to the speed, especially the write speed. Often, it's a doubling of capacity and a doubling of write speeds. So, the best value for money is that the write speed is a bit low.

Of course, if you have enough money, the bigger the better.

Regardless of the price Intel's best, the solid state that can be guaranteed if the health is not good, we use Intel to make servers.

Hello, the performance and life of the SSD mainly depend on its particles and the main control. At present, the best one should be Samsung! **Also relatively expensive. It is recommended to read some SSD review articles, which will be helpful to you.

At present, the better ones are Samsung, OCZ and SanDisk.

1.It's not that I heard that Kingston's SSDs are bad, and I believe that they are bad. The key is whether I have used it or not, I have used Kingston SSDs, and the effect is good, 2SSD, a better brand is Samsung, Intel, Kingston, Western Digital, these brands are good. Full marks are given for both performance and value for money.

Samsung EVO Intel, Western Digital.

SSDs I recommend the Pucot P series, SanDisk Extreme series, Intel original, Samsung Pro series.

These 4 have good performance and fast speed!

If you're only thinking about performance, it's worth having.