What about the Sennheiser CX200?

I'm using this headset, it's actually just an entry-level headset, and if you expect too much from it, you're wrong. It's not bad for the restoration of the human voice,It's good for bass,But the midrange and treble don't seem to have any characteristics,You can also experience the effect of more than the general headphones when you listen to rock and DJ,After all, Senhai's big brand,Overall,There are no obvious shortcomings in this headset,Of course,There are not too many outstanding places。 Personally, if you don't have strict requirements for sound quality, it is enough to satisfy you, because it is really cost-effective.

The Sennheiser CX200 is a personalized headset for rock, rap and hip-hop with a strong emphasis on low frequencies, which is perfect if you like to listen to bass and boys' voices or girls' slightly husky voices. The downside, of course, is that the midrange and highs are noticeably lacking. As for the price-performance ratio, Sennheiser is of course favored by a significantly lower position than Sony and others in professional headphones.

1 The highlight is the huge low frequency, and the amount of low frequency is very large. The disadvantage is the lack of low-frequency elasticity, and the mid-frequency vocal processing is not very good, and the female voice is a bit tragic. Don't mention high frequencies.

2. The cost performance is not very high, but considering that the headphones with low frequency and large volume at the same price are nothing, they are still competitive. Compared with the AKG K315, the latter is more elastic, but the volume is not as large as that of the CX200. 3. You can consider it, but be aware that if you listen outside, for example, the sound insulation performance of the ear on the way to work may be dangerous.

The Sennheiser CX200 headphones are more average.

Look & Wear: This sleek headset features an innovative case shape that makes it easy to adjust with your fingers for a more comfortable fit. The innovative finger-adjustable shape makes it easier and more comfortable to wear (with different sizes of ear pads).

Sound: The low frequency is good, the volume is in place, and the dive is OK. The texture is slightly lacking.

Vocals are clear and forward, but slightly dry and harsh. However, the midrange is the worst link, which is too thin, so it affects the extension of the high frequency. The overall timbre is muffled, with a slight lack of midrange resolution and a slightly harsh treble.

Basic parameters: impedance: 16 ohms; Sensitivity: 110dB (1kHz 1VRMS); Total Harmonic Distortion: <; Sound pressure: (SPL): 110 dB (1kHz 1VRMS); Weight: 5g

The low frequency is definitely the biggest point, the 230 cost performance, that's quite high, with the N86, you can completely push up this headphone, this headset can fully satisfy your ears.

First, the subject is different.

1. CX215: It is an in-ear dynamic headphone.

2. CX200: It is an in-ear headphone.

Second, the sensitivity is different.

1. CX215: sensitivity 111dB (1kHz 1VRMS) 2. CX200: sensitivity 110dB (1kHz 1vrms) Third, the frequency response range is different.

1、cx215：22-20000hz。

2、cx200： 20hz-20khz。

Some people on the Internet say that the bass of the two headphones is about the same, but the CX215 has a partial improvement in treble. But personally, I think the two headphones have the same sense of hearing, only the color is different, and you can't distinguish it at all without looking at the appearance.

CX series focuses on bass,CX200 is more cost-effective than 215, although 215 has been strengthened in the middle and high tones,But since I choose the CX series, I still pay attention to the bass,CX200 is enough,If you listen to the middle and high tones,It is recommended not to choose both。

I'm using CX215 now, and the 215 hierarchy is still relatively clear.

First, the subject is different.

1. CX215: It is an in-ear dynamic headphone.

2. CX200: It is an in-ear headphone.

Second, the sensitivity is different.

1. CX215: sensitivity 111dB (1kHz 1VRMS) 2. CX200: sensitivity 110dB (1kHz 1vrms) <>

Third, the frequency response range is different.

1、cx215：22-20000hz。

2、cx200： 20hz-20khz。

I just bought the CX200 for 200 yuan, the sound insulation is quite good, and it is quite beautiful It looks good when you wear it, hehe.

I also hesitated for a long time and finally chose the CX200, because the bass of these headphones is quite outstanding, which is very suitable for pop**, I am cooking Really good sound quality, very comfortable In-ear sound isolation is better, sometimes wearing earbuds out of the noisy environment is not very clear, so I have to turn the sound on, and the in-ear type solves this problem, which can close the external sound. The louder sound is actually more harmful to the ears, in a sense, the in-ear type is more protective of the ears, hehe Of course, it is just a suggestion for you, and you choose it yourself.

CX200: Innovative, finger-adjustable, easy-to-fit form factor for easier and more comfortable fit (with ear cushions in different sizes) Powerful, bass-driven stereo High passive ambient noise rejection Optimized for *****, iPods, iPhones, CDs** and portable game consoles.

CX300: A classic series of in-ear earbuds launched by Sennheiser in 2006. The wire adopts the most common long** design, which is more convenient to wear, and the diameter of the right-angle L-shaped plug is also more mainstream. 3 silicone ear tips of different sizes are included.

This headset is suitable for users who have high requirements for the sound quality and appearance of the product.

Good in-ear sealing, convenient for users to enjoy outdoors**.

You can compare the two** to see what you like.

I don't know much about these two stoppers, what style do you listen to??