How to deeply understand the poor son, rich daughter ?

The original meaning of this sentence should be: let boys have more "hardship" education, and let girls have more delicate ingredients. The purpose is to cultivate the boy's spirit of hardship and stimulate him to work hard; Cultivate a girl's appreciation and taste for life. ‍‍

I think raising a son in poverty is an investment in a boy's life; Raising a daughter is an investment in cultural accomplishment. The common denominator between the two is to develop your baby's self-confidence, self-reliance and wisdom. has always been rich and ladylike, and since ancient times, he has been a great man.

Therefore, "boys are poor, girls are rich" has become the "golden rule" of traditional parenting. ‍

"Poor raise sons and rich daughters", to put it bluntly, there is actually a prerequisite in front of this sentence, that is, you are not poor. For the real poor, it is doomed to raise children poorly, and only families who do not have to worry about food and clothing will think about whether their children should be poor or rich. Poverty is terrible, but also helpless, no wonder they say that reincarnation is a technical job, but our parents brought us to this world, and they are already doing their best to give you the best life, so we can't complain, say directly, this is fate! ‍‍

In my opinion, the meaning of "raising a son in poverty and raising a daughter in rich" should be: boys should cultivate the ability to take care of themselves independently, so the requirements will be stricter in both economy and life, rather than cultivating children's stingy character; Girls need to spend more money and experience to cultivate temperament and cultivation, rather than blindly spoiling them and causing them to spend money without moderation. ‍‍

In my opinion, how many sons or daughters can be poor, the key is to cultivate children's good living habits and survival ability, psychological endurance from an early age! ‍‍

Whether it is a daughter or a son, she should be both poor and rich, and her daughter also needs to cultivate a sense of hardship and responsibility.

I think that the "poor sons and rich daughters" who can adapt to the public should or can only be understood and operated from the spiritual level. "Poor" means exhausting all the bad things, so that they are free from bad problems, bad habits, and bad conduct to the greatest extent. Its "wealth" is the spirit of abundance, and we will do our best to make it rich in knowledge, taste, temperament and self-cultivation. ‍‍

In my understanding, there is no need to distinguish between poor sons and rich daughters, and sons and daughters are the same. Neither sons nor daughters should place too much emphasis on the concept of being poor and rich. We must first understand thoroughly how to raise the poor and the rich, if we can't understand the concept of the poor and the rich, no matter how to raise, we can't raise it!

As a parent, don't think too much about how to raise your children, how to educate your children, learn to raise yourself first! If parents put more energy into their own improvement, and they have been learning and progressing, will their children still worry about not being able to raise themselves? ‍‍

The real meaning of "poor sons and rich daughters" does not refer to the rich and poor in terms of money and material comforts. Nowadays, many families, regardless of their children, are willing to spend money, and even squeeze out the legitimate consumption of their parents to "raise" their children. That's what it means to not really understand the phrase.

To raise a son in poverty is to train children from an early age to withstand setbacks, undergo tempering, understand that there is no free lunch, and that boys should be self-reliant, etc., and have the ability and knowledge to achieve these. To be rich is to pay attention to the cultivation of girls' knowledge, knowledge, and coping ability. In the evaluation of Miss Hong Kong, not only shows the figure and appearance, but also shows the talent, which also has the etiquette and conversation on elegant occasions.

Someone gave an example: Lin Huiyin's father took her to Europe when she was a teenager, and she saw the customs of Europe and the treatment of people in high society. For example, people think that this is called abundance. ‍‍

Summary. Dear, I'm glad to answer your questions. The z positive meaning of the son being poor and the daughter being rich is :

Raising a son in poverty is an investment in a boy's life, and raising a daughter in wealth is an investment in cultural accomplishment. The common denominator between the two is to develop your baby's self-confidence, self-reliance and wisdom. has always been rich and ladylike, and since ancient times, he has been a great man.

Therefore, "boys are poor, girls are rich" has become the "golden rule" of traditional parenting.

Dear, I'm glad to answer your questions. The positive meaning of the son raising the daughter is poor: raising the son poorly is an investment in the boy's life, and raising a daughter is an investment in cultural accomplishment.

The common denominator between the two is to cultivate self-confidence, self-reliance and wisdom in your baby. has always been rich and ladylike, and since ancient times, he has been a great man. Therefore, "boys are poor, girls are rich and rent sedan chairs" has become the "golden rule" of traditional parenting.

Kissing, "poor sons and rich daughters" is an ancient folk precept, the understanding of the ancient precept, can not be generalized, to be understood from the philosophy and broad sense, can not be accepted from a narrow angle. Otherwise, every proverb and ancient precept will be biased. Ancient precepts, usually concise and profound, need us to savor at all times!

Not to be underestimated! Some people also say that boys are as fierce as tigers, and girls are as beautiful as flowers. I thought that poverty was tempering, and a boy was a clay body, and Pei Dan would grow into a man in the future, so that he could withstand the wind and rain after falling.

Rich is cared for, and the girl is a lotus root, and she can't afford it, so she has to be delicate and raised. The non-material ratio between the poor and the rich is really the difference between light and heavy.

has always been rich and ladylike, and since ancient times, he has been a great man.

Quote: As the saying goes, "the children of poor families are in charge of the house early", if boys live in an environment with particularly superior material conditions since childhood, it is easy to form a sense of superiority and the idea of getting something for nothing, and most of the sons of rich families have not become the sons of the gentlemen? A relatively simple living environment is more conducive to shaping children's positive and hard-working psychology, so that children have a sense of responsibility and endurance from an early age.

Originally, in today's society, men are under a lot of pressure, if they have been going well since childhood and can get a lot of things without too much effort, if they encounter setbacks in the future, they will not be able to accept it, or they will not be able to bear too much pressure and give up.

I don't agree with this point of view, education (guidance) is the key, the daughters of wealthy families are not necessarily ladies, can they be successful without good upbringing. On the contrary, most of the children of poor families are supported by their parents, and they do not necessarily become talents, relying on enlightenment education.

"Poor sons and rich daughters" should be interpreted as: poor families raise more sons, and rich families raise more daughters. This is in line with the statistical law of fertility.

Because in ancient times, there was a son of a rich family, because after being rich, his family was completely ruined, and he was useless, they were very good to their daughters, and their daughters were also very filial.

In fact, he is afraid that he will raise his son, and his son will become a loser in the future and achieve nothing. If you raise your daughter poorly, you are afraid that you will be deceived by other people.

It is a conclusion reached by some ancients based on the situation of each family, and it is also combined with the background of the times at that time.

Rich adopted daughter means that the daughter must be raised by the rich from an early age, and the son must be raised by the poor from an early age, so that the daughter-in-law can be protected when he grows up.

This statement is based on the experience of the older generation. It is more prevalent in rural areas. But there is no scientific basis for such a claim. It is very unreasonable to say.

I don't think that's right, whether it's a boy or a girl, if you can give him the best, give it to him. Let him live happily.

I don't think it's good to do this, both daughters and sons should be treated equally and give them the best.

The myth in this sentence is to convey that when educating scumbag boys, they must be more demanding materially, and girls can try to meet their needs in this regard, so that they can pay attention to boys' sense of independence and responsibility, cultivate a better quality, and girls can broaden their horizons and increase their experience and knowledge.

This sentence means that raising a son can be rougher, and raising a daughter needs to create very favorable conditions for her daughter. I don't agree with that.

Financially poor to raise a son, spiritually rich to support a daughter. Because Luntong only controls the boy's desire for money, it will make the boy become a fighting spirit, and the spiritual wealth of her daughter will make her more independent.