What are the writers who haven t died yet, and what are the names of famous writers who have just di

Mo Yan, Yang Hongying, Cao Wenxuan.

It was the French writer Roland Barthes who put forward the idea that "the author is dead".

Roland Barthes published his most famous "Death of the Author" in 1967, largely influenced by Jacques Derrida's rising deconstructivism, which became a turning point for him to say goodbye to structuralist ideas.

The author is dead, not to the absence of the author, but to the concealment of the author. Fundamentally, it does not mean that the dominance of the text is transferred to the reader, but that a free interpretive space is obtained, a multi-dimensional and three-dimensional interpretive space.

Barthes believes that the author is dead when the work is completed, and the rest of the cultural creation work is the reader's right. Only when the author dies can the reader be born, and all reading activities are a dialogue between the reader's mind and a written "text", and value is created in this process.

It is the writer Mr. Wang Guozhen.

Wang Guozhen, born in Beijing on June 22, 1956, is a contemporary poet, calligrapher and painter. He graduated from the Department of Chinese of Jinan University in 1982.

In 1984, he published his first influential poem "I Smile and Go to Life". Since 1985, he has concentrated his spare time on poetry creation, during which a limerick poem "School Day" was published in China Youth Daily. Since 1990, Wang Guozhen has served as a columnist for "Liaoning Youth", "Chinese Youth" and "Girlfriend", setting off a wave of "Wang Guozhen fever".

Since 2005, his calligraphy works have been presented to foreign political parties and state leaders as gifts for leading comrades' visits. In 2005, he served as the director of the Literary and Artistic Creation Center of the Chinese Academy of Arts.

At 2:10 a.m. on April 26, 2015, Wang Guozhen died at the age of 59. On April 30, the farewell ceremony of the body was held at the Babaoshan Funeral Home in Beijing.

Some people say that writers' suicide is a cultural phenomenon, and it is closely related to the cultural psychology, social conditions, and political and economic factors of the country to which the writer belongs. Even writers who see the world more clearly, more clearly, and more thoroughly cannot escape the fetters of the world, and cannot use their ability to avoid the troubles of the world, but on the contrary, they are more confused and preoccupied, and this pain beyond their ability to carry them pushes them to the brink of death, and their suicidal behavior seems more natural and natural—this behavior helps them escape the pain that torments them day and night, all the time.

Because their creative inspiration is gone, their whole world is creating, they just want to be the best, and then they get depressed, and then they don't do well.

Because many writers are more sensitive, they feel more deeply about the pain of life, so they are easy to choose suicide.

The average writer is very delicate in emotion, but if the emotion is too delicate, it is easy to be hit in life, and if they encounter setbacks, they are likely to fall into it and cannot extricate themselves, and in the end, they may commit suicide when they see through the red dust.

Just because it's too depressing, maybe it's because it's too pessimistic. There is no hope for life and prosperity.

What is the use of ideals, it is not forced to die by poverty!

- Is Literature Dead?

j.Hillis Miller (1928) holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University. He is a famous American literary critic, an outstanding scholar of European and American literature and comparative literature, and an important representative of deconstructionist criticism.

He has taught at Hopkins University and Yale University, and is currently a distinguished professor in the Department of English and Comparative Studies and the Institute of Critical Theory at the University of California, Erwan.

There is no doubt that literature is in decline, so much so that many people have a feeling that literature is dying, and even say that literature is dead.

- Is Literature Dead? This question is no less important than Nietzsche.

At that time, he raised his arms and shouted, "God is dead, God's death, is a kind of collapse of the moral framework, a re-establishment of order." In the same way, the death of literature does not mean its demise, but nirvana.

It's rebirth. Although as mentioned in the book, the impact of modern **, the development of democracy, freedom of speech, and the development of self-thought (academic deconstruction of literature, suppression of literature) suppressed literature (success or failure is due to this, and the unbridled extermination is also the development of **, here refers to paper media, that is, printing.

of prosperity; The idea of democracy and freedom has given literature the space to grow freely and strongly), but this is only a superficial phenomenon of the world, and it is more about making literature present in a diversified manner: online literature, listening to books, and so on.

Some scholars have said that the construction of the spiritual world and the development of the material world seem to alternate, and the immateriality of literature should be classified as the former, which has signs of weakness, and can only be said to be temporary, or that literature is underestimated, but only relative to the rapidly developing world. Macro <>

This brings us to the question of the function of literature. Literature can be used as an experience to accumulate the thickness of your life.

Outside the book, the reader is the other who sees everything, accompanies the subject, and grabs the subject's experience. This "non-transcendental" experience can be hidden in your subconscious, as in "How to Read a Book" mentions the function of literary books. Not to mention the big and small decisions you make in your life, which are subconsciously influenced when you can't make a rational decision (most people are still more inclined to intuition, which is extracted from subconscious experience, rather than listening to reason).

And all of these have been impressed by the great influence of literature.

In addition, we have to mention what Jung called the "collective unconscious". As a carrier with the function of recording the events of the time (literature is the most popular form among the audience, it permeates all aspects, even if it is a masterpiece of historiography, it is inseparable from literary penmanship), it can penetrate the past and the present, and the "collective subconscious" can bury its roots for people in this way.

Isn't this how moral conventions have been handed down? In this way, the Wenshan School plays a dual role, being both a constructor and penetrating into the subconscious; It is also a deconstructor, and it is morally ambiguous. <>

- Is Literature Dead, What Literature Should We Read? What is good literature and what is bad literature? In the age of globalization and digitalization, is there still a future for literature?

There has been a lot of discussion about this. But what exactly is literature? Why do we read literature?