Is it an infringement to quote the content of the encyclopedia in the broadcast manuscript?

Not infringing: Publicly known content cannot be regarded as infringement, such as the earth is round, constantly rotating, etc.; If the encyclopedia cites other works, that's a different matter, and you should give credit to the source.

Encyclopedia is an open and free online encyclopedia launched by the company, the beta version was launched on April 20, 2006, and the official version was released on April 21, 2008. Encyclopedia aims to create a Chinese information collection platform covering knowledge in various fields.

Encyclopedia emphasizes the participation and dedication of users, fully mobilizes the power of Internet users, gathers the minds and wisdom of hundreds of millions of users, and actively communicates and shares. At the same time, the encyclopedia realizes the combination of search and knowledge to meet the needs of users for information from different levels.

The tort is a civil fault and not a breach of contract, for which the court will provide a remedy in a form of action for damages";

Breach of legal duty said. The concept of tort is defined primarily in terms of breach of statutory obligations. From the perspective of the distinction between infringement and breach of contract, a universally recognized and most complete definition of infringement is given.

It is held that "liability for tort arises from the breach of an obligation predetermined in advance by law, which is for ordinary citizens, and the remedy for breach of such obligation is an action for unliquidated damages", and therefore tort refers to the breach of an obligation under the law for the general person, rather than a breach of a contractual obligation for a specific person provided for by the parties' own agreement;

The theory of fault liability holds that fault is only the basis for giving rise to tort liability.

Article 49 of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China In order to protect copyright and copyright-related rights, the right holder may take technical measures.

Without the permission of the right holder, no organization or individual may intentionally circumvent or destroy technological measures, shall not manufacture, import or provide relevant devices or components to the public for the purpose of circumventing or destroying technical measures, and shall not intentionally provide technical services for others to circumvent or destroy technical measures. However, there are exceptions to situations that can be avoided as provided by laws and administrative regulations.

"Technological measures" as used in this Law refers to effective technologies, devices, or components used to prevent or restrict the viewing and appreciation of works, performances, audio or video recordings without the permission of the rights holders, or to provide works, performances, audio or video recordings to the public through information networks.

Whoever encroaches on whom's rights. Birth is not also a violation. Is it necessary to prepare gold and silver mountains before being born?

1.In the era of information technology, it is not uncommon to collect information from the Internet.

2.However, it is necessary to protect the authenticity of the knowledge and not to be tampered with, and indicate that it is included in that **.

3.Depending on what kind of genre you are quoting, news, writings, books, **, posts, etc., and whether the beginning or end of the text indicates that ** use is strictly prohibited, etc.

Not counted. **is to let**.

The following link to the Encyclopedia Rights Statement Encyclopedia The information is also uploaded by individuals.

According to the Copyright Law, no matter what kind of use you are using or not, you must indicate that you are quoting others, and you must limit it to the scope of "appropriate", and if it exceeds the scope of "appropriate", you must obtain the consent of the other party.

Article 22: The use of a work in the following circumstances may be made without the permission of the copyright owner and without payment of remuneration to him, provided that the name of the author and the title of the work shall be indicated, and other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner in accordance with this Law shall not be infringed:

If you write some blog posts on the Internet or something, it definitely doesn't count, but if you want to publish it, common sense things definitely don't count, such as the introduction of some nouns, ......But if it is written by the author himself, it is not necessarily.

It shouldn't be that serious.

Personal thoughts.

Encyclopedia as a whole, it should be free, but if you do academic publishing, it's best to find someone who can take responsibility. Be careful about that. Now I know that both Wikipedia and Interactive Encyclopedia can undertake, Wikipedia English is the strongest, and Interactive Encyclopedia Chinese is the strongest.

Not counted. As long as the **** is indicated in the following citations.