Should student test scores and rankings be published for you?

Some people think that if students' test scores and rankings are not announced, then they don't know the gap between themselves and other students, and they don't know how to adjust their study plans next. Some people think that if students' test scores and rankings are published, it will hurt students' self-esteem to a certain extent, and even cause irreversible consequences in serious cases. But in my opinion, I feel that student test scores and rankings should be released.

By disclosing students' test scores and rankings, you can be aware of the gap between yourself and others。Students in one grade and one class have different academic performance, and there are students with excellent academic performance and students who are lagging behind. If students are not released in order to protect their self-esteem, they will never know where they stand in the class, and some people may even fall into a mood of low self-esteem or arrogance, and cannot find their place.

But if they know where their grades rank in their grade, then this may encourage them to work harder and catch up with other students who are doing better. Therefore, public performance rankings are a more effective way to motivate students.

Publicizing students' test scores and rankings can improve students' resilience to frustration to a certain extent。Today's children's ability to resist setbacks is getting lower and lower, and they will languish at the slightest little thing, and they can't even think about it. This may be because they have not encountered anything difficult since they were young, and they have not encountered setbacks.

If the path of life is smooth sailing, with only sunshine and no clouds, then such a life is easy to beat. Therefore, the disclosure of students' test scores and rankings has a certain effect on students' ability to resist setbacks. In this way, students are aware of their own shortcomings, aware of the gap between themselves and others, and have a sense of frustration, and then through the teaching and comfort of teachers and parents, they can re-find their own learning position.

Although I am in favor of making students' test scores and rankings public, in this process, it takes the efforts of teachers and teachers to form a home-school synergy. It is not possible to blindly ask students to improve their academic performance, but to observe the psychological condition of students after the test results are ranked, and find ways to comfort and encourage students in a timely manner, and give them guidance on the way forward. If only the ranking of students' grades is made public, and teachers and parents do not take other corresponding measures, then the publication of students' performance rankings will do more harm than good.

I think it should be announced, because students work hard to get better grades and rank higher in the class. Announcing children's academic performance and rankings is also a feedback to children, so that students can know that their efforts have been met, and what aspects they can continue to work on.

To me, I don't think the results and rankings of students' exams should be published, but should be a matter of personal privacy and should not be published without permission.

Student test scores and rankings should be published. Because it will make the child more motivated. Give them a punch. It can make them learn better.

Personally, I think that students' test scores and rankings should be announced, for today's society, the pressure of exams is so great, if the results and rankings are not announced, some children are actually unaware that they have regressed.

I think the results of the exam should be published.

Judging from the education received by everyone, the teacher will announce the scores and rankings for each exam. While some educationalists have been advocating for the privacy of students and not publishing grades. But in practice, it is difficult to fully implement this.

Only through clear test scores can the good students be distinguished from the poor students, so that the teacher can teach according to his aptitude.

I don't think there's anything wrong with releasing the scores, on the contrary, it can motivate students to work harder and get a high score next time. Today's state of education requires teachers to be strict with their students, and publish rankings for both quizzes and large-scale land exams. Only when there is a healthy competition among students can it be beneficial to the management of the class, which is responsible for the students and parents.

1. Publishing results can motivate students, let them know the gap between themselves and the first place, and then have a direction to work towards.

The whole class should learn from the first place and strive to make a lot of progress next time. If results are not published, students will not know where they are and what they are doing, and they will not be able to make improvements.

2. The announcement of the results of the group congratulation can help teachers teach according to their aptitude.

Each student has different innate aptitudes, and so does the type of education they can receive. From the examination papers, we can know their shortcomings, and the results will be announced to the whole class, so that students can know their learning situation so that they can learn in the next stage of learning.

3. There will be motivation when there is pressure.

Teachers exert a certain amount of pressure to get students to put in more effort. Some students need to be urged by teachers to study hard, and they do not have enough initiative, which is actually a common problem for many children. In the actual process of education, many teachers will divide students into three, six, nine and so on by scores, and I do not approve of treating students differently, whether they are top students or junior students, they should get the same educational resources.

When you were a student, did you ever work hard to get your test results published? Tell us about your past.

1.The results of outstanding students should be published, unless the students themselves request not to do so.

Announcing the results of outstanding students can make outstanding students gain a sense of honor and study harder. It can also make other students recognize the gap between themselves and outstanding students, and work hard.

2.It is better if the results of poor students are not announced.

Announcing the results of poor students is easy to make poor students feel shameless and affect their work, study and life. It is also easy to make students with good grades feel proud and reduce their enthusiasm for learning.

I don't think the exam results should be released to the public, because for some people who are not doing well, they will hurt their self-esteem or feel shameless.

I don't think our test results should be published in public, because this kind of practice will cause a lot of pressure on ourselves, and it will also make students change and compete with each other.

No. Because it is very inappropriate to publish the results of Sidou in public, it will hurt the self-esteem of students, which is not conducive to the growth of students, and will lead to great pressure on students.

I think that our exam results should not be good and should be announced to the public, because if it is published in the public, poor students will feel very inferior, which is not conducive to children's psychological development, and may even lead to depression.

The practice of not publishing results is strongly discouraged.

The reason why the school does not publish the results of the school is based on the fact that in recent years, some individual students have committed suicide because of unsatisfactory test results and because they are unable to bear the psychological pressure after the school has released their results. In fact, there are many reasons for a child's suicide, and it is not because of this that the student's grades are not published.

We know that China's education now revolves around the college entrance examination, and the end point is the college entrance examination, which can also be said to be a lifelong examination, just like the imperial examination in ancient times. So when the college entrance examination is admitted, it is admitted according to the ranking, what is the ranking of students in each province? Then there are how many places the university admits in the province, and then the top few are taken for admission.

Regardless of whether a student's grades are good or bad, as long as they are ranked first, they may be admitted. So you can see the importance of ranking.

Now the school does not publish the results of students.

First of allStudents themselves are not able to understand their ranking in the class, and they do not know what level of university they can get in the college entrance examination.

On the other handParents don't know where their child is ranked in the class, so they don't know how well their child is learning. Many times, when the teacher is holding a parent-teacher conference, he will say in general terms, what is the student's grade? It seems to be all tucked and hidden.

I don't know whose interests are being safeguarded by this practice.

Actually, the teacherI am also reluctant to do this, because doing so is a shield for the weak and does not have the slightest benefit for students to improve their grades.

FinallyTo enhance the psychological quality of students, families and schools can carry out more psychological communication and counseling, improve the psychological quality of students, publish students' grades and rankings, make learning open and transparent, and give parents and children competition and motivation to learn, which has a great role in promoting the overall teaching level of the school and the academic performance of students.

Because it protects the privacy of students. First, it is conducive to reducing children's learning pressure. The biggest concern for children in their studies is their grades.

Second, it is conducive to safeguarding the private rights and interests of children. Children can also have privacy. Third, it is conducive to the relationship between teachers and students.

The school and the teacher protect the child's privacy, and the child will respect the teacher more.

The main purpose is to protect students' privacy and protect students' self-esteem, but I am very opposed to this time, because excessive protection makes children unable to withstand any wind and waves, and they do not know their own situation without comparison, and do not announce it also makes some students become lax, because others can't see it, it doesn't matter how many points they score, and there is less motivation to move forward.

1.If student grades and rankings are not published, there is no pressure on parents, students, teachers, or schools. Compound China's nine-year compulsory education system.

2. Students in these nine years are the foundation for high school. If you don't have pressure, you will definitely not be able to study well, and when you graduate from junior high school, you will know that your child will not be able to get into high school, it is too late, and there is no cure

Not publishing grades and rankings can maintain students' self-esteem and privacy, avoid discrimination and harm to children who are poorer in learning, reduce comparisons, and relieve children's learning pressure.

I think there is some effect, but the college entrance examination still depends on the child's grades, and the study pressure is still there. In addition, not announcing the results may make the child lack a sense of competition and be unable to find his own position.

Therefore, although the school does not publish the grades, parents and children should pay attention and ask the teacher about the grades and rankings to have a rough assessment of the child's grades.

Because I am afraid that students will compare with each other, resulting in discrimination and contradictions and disputes between students, I think this is a good thing, and it is also worth promoting and imitating.

The purpose of not publishing students' grades is to fear of hitting children's self-confidence, because many children now have very strong self-esteem, and if they rank their report cards, it is easy to hit children. And today's children are competitive, and parents do not allow their children to lose at the starting line, so they will make their children particularly good from an early age, because of this, children are also affected by parents, so now many departments stipulate that schools are not allowed to rank students' grades, just to encourage children, for fear of hitting children's self-confidence.

Academic performance rankings can cause harm to some students, and judging heroes solely by grades also deviates from the educational policy of all-round moral, intellectual and physical development.

1.Affect students' mental health: Students need to study in a relaxed and happy learning environment, and mandatory grading will increase a lot of pressure on students, which is not conducive to learning enthusiasm and learning outcomes, and is easy to have a negative impact on students' mental health.

2.Inaccuracy of data assessment: A student's performance is not only evaluated by numbers, because numerical evaluations cannot fully reflect the student's strengths and growth, special background, level of effort, learning style and other factors.

3.High-intensity supervision: Too much supervision and other behaviors can easily make people feel that the management behavior of the school and the teaching orange master is too tough, and does not pay enough attention to the personality and healthy development of students.

Therefore, when assessing students' performance and progress, we should adopt a more comprehensive and integrated assessment method, including caring for students' life dynamics, family situation, personality and moral character, and other comprehensive qualities, rather than just based on test scores, performance in and out of class, and some superficial numbers. To obtain an accurate and objective evaluation, it is not a brief record of some superficial figures, but a more comprehensive result through the peace of mind of parents and teachers.

1.This will put tremendous pressure on the lack of students. Students in the lower grades, in particular, are very sensitive to grades and rankings. This all-round monitoring and grading mechanism will make students feel that they are being scrutinized and judged at all times, which will seriously affect their interest in learning and physical and mental health.

2.This mechanism ignores the individual differences of students. Each student has a different family environment, personality traits, and learning ability, and it is unfair to mechanically use the same set of criteria for grading and ranking, which will hurt the self-esteem of some students.

3.This can lead to student exploitation. In order to get grades, some students will choose to act against their will to conform to the grading criteria, which defeats the original purpose of education.

4.The scientific validity of this scoring mechanism is questionable. Many students' performance is not simply "right and wrong" or "good or bad" to be judged, but the app seems to look at these issues too simplically. This makes it difficult to guarantee the credibility and validity of the scoring results.

5.This can be abused as a tool to put pressure on some teachers. If grading is linked to rewards and punishments or salaries, some teachers will demand too much from students in pursuit of school assessment goals.

Therefore, I believe that this kind of all-round monitoring and grading of students through technical means is an irresponsible way of education for students' physical and mental health, which is not conducive to the healthy growth of students and goes against the original intention of education. This practice should attract sufficient attention, and make a comprehensive demonstration before implementation to ensure its rationality and scientificity.