1 4 Kia K2 is 50,000 yuan recently, 1 5 Sail 3 is also 50,000 yuan, which car is better? Durable and

From these two models, I still recommend buying, yes, Sail will be slightly better because of the power, and the other aspect is more cost-effective, but there are more small problems with the two cars, and in terms of fuel consumption, it is basically the same.

It may be that Kia's handling performance is better and the sense of technology is stronger, but the comprehensive fuel consumption will be higher, and the Korean car is not very valuable.

Hello, according to the comparison of these two models, I personally prefer the Kia K2 car, which has a beautiful appearance and is comfortable to drive, so you can choose it.

Hello, based on the comparison of the above two models, it is recommended to choose Dongfeng Yueda Kia K2, this car has a beautiful appearance, comfortable to drive, and it is worth starting.

Even though I'm a GM repairer, I still recommend the Kia car, but now it has a political impact. Buy Kia without considering politics.

Recommend Kia K2, after all, it is a joint venture model, the technology is more stable, the quality is reliable, and the market share is large.

Compared with Sail 3, it is more durable, the chassis is solid and stable, and the fuel consumption performance is also good, which is affordable.

Sail, the technology is better. There is a large number of national cars. The leather is durable, and the value retention rate is relatively better.

Hello, I recommend you to buy the Chevrolet Sail this car, my car is also a Sail, driving 50,000 kilometers in four years, the quality has been very good, and the fuel consumption is not high.

Hello, it is recommended that the Chevrolet Sail, the quality is stable, the leather is durable, and the fuel consumption is relatively low. It's a little more practical.

Hello, the overall performance of these two cars gives people the feeling that the performance of this car is a little better.

New or used? If you want a new car, it is recommended that Kia K2, which is relatively more cost-effective, and you can test drive it to feel it.

Hello, I still choose Sail, his reputation and quality are better, and Kia's reputation is not very good.

First of all, the Kia K2 has more space and a more novel model, so you can consider the Kia K2 for home transportation.

It is recommended that Sail 3, a small car that Chevrolet is very close to the people, with relatively mature technology and fewer minor problems.

This can be seen in the overall performance of Sail, the overall performance of Sail is very good, the safety is higher, the brand effect is very good, and the quality is also durable.

It's all about the same Sail to be slightly better.

Compared with Kia K2, I personally think that Kia K2 is relatively better, and I personally think that Kia K2 is relatively fashionable in terms of car shape design.

Hello, these two cars are relatively good, comprehensive comparison, I personally recommend buying Kia's K two, the appearance design of this car is more beautiful, and then the cost performance is relatively high, fuel consumption is relatively low.

Relatively speaking, the Kia K2 and the Sail 3 are more fuel-efficient, with the same displacement, a lighter body, and relatively more fuel-efficient.

Hello, Sail's fuel consumption is less, the quality and workmanship are also excellent, and it retains its value.

It should be said that the difference between the two models in terms of fuel consumption performance is not very large, and if you have to calculate it accurately, maybe Kia K2 has a slight advantage.

Kia K2 and Sail III are relatively speaking, Sail 3 is more fuel-efficient, and the comprehensive fuel consumption of Sail 3 is about seven points.

The fuel consumption of these two cars is not much different, but the overall safety of the Sail is better and the quality is more stable.

Comparatively speaking, the comprehensive fuel consumption of Sail III may be lower, generally around 6 to about 6 is relatively reasonable.

If you compare these two cars, the fuel consumption of Sail III is relatively low, and the comprehensive fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is about 7.

Hello, I personally feel that the fuel consumption is still okay after the start and stop function is added to the Sail 3, the vehicle safety is relatively high, and there is no large-scale response after the launch, and there is no quality problem.

These two cars are definitely Kia K2 fuel-efficient, as a Korean car, the appearance is stylish and beautiful, the interior is exquisite, and the fuel consumption is not high, which is suitable for family use.

Hello, K2 fuel consumption is relatively low, but the quality and chassis are not as good as Sail 3.

For these two cars, Kia K2 is relatively more fuel-efficient, and its interior workmanship is better than Europe, so it is recommended to choose Kia K2.

The Sail 3 is more fuel-efficient than the Kia K2, and the same displacement and configuration will save about fuel consumption. The technology is more advanced than Yaya.

The fuel consumption of these two cars is about the same, but I think the Sail is better, the leather is solid and resistant, the car is more solid, and the safety is good.

Hello, this is of course the Sail 3's fuel consumption performance is better, and the space is still considered Kia K2

Hello, these two cars are generally K2 is more fuel-efficient, and Korean cars are lighter and faster, so fuel consumption is relatively low.

Both cars are more fuel-efficient, and the difference is not very big. Basically, it's about six or seven. Refer to individual road conditions.

Hello, the quality of Euro III is better, more fuel-efficient, cost-effective, the sales volume is relatively large, and there are not many small problems.

Hello, it must be the K2 that is the most fuel-efficient, and the body is relatively light. But the safety of this car is very poor, so it is better to choose Sail 3

The official website of the People's Republic of China has given the answer.

China Automobile Consumption Network rated the top ten bad cars in 2015-2016 Chevrolet Sail 3 Reason for award: EMT gearbox frequent gear hopping, spontaneous combustion, new car rust Engine cylinder failure light alarm.

Chevrolet Cruze All Reasons for Awards: Engine Cylinder Failure Light Alarm Serious Fuel Consumption Transmission Control Module Failure, Body Control Module Failure, Spontaneous Combustion.

Buick Excelle Reason for award: engine cylinder failure, fault lamp alarm, instrument panel degumming, valve cover gasket leakage, oil pump bracket cracking and oil leakage.

GM's three-car series is on the list.

China's car consumption reminds you: you must not touch a car with a common problem.

The official website of People's Daily Online has given the answer to the top ten bad cars in 2015 by China Automobile Consumption Network Chevrolet Sail 3 Reason for award: EMT transmission frequent gear hopping, rust, spontaneous combustion, airbag failure, engine failure Lack of cylinder lights Chevrolet Cruze full range Reason for award: transmission control module failure, body control module failure, spontaneous combustion Buick Excelle Reason for award:

The instrument panel is degummed, the valve cover gasket is leaking, and the oil pump bracket is cracking and leaking. GM's three-car series is on the list and dominates China's automobile consumption reminds you: cars with common problems must not be touched.

To tell you the truth, Sail 3 is actually made by the private sector in Dongyue, Shandong, pure mainland production, its performance is miniature, not suitable for comparing any car, go to the major complaints** to take a look.

Hello, this one is of course Sail 3 is slightly better, if my answer is helpful to you, please set it to.

Personally, I feel that Hyundai is better, Kia is better, and Chevrolet is better.

I feel like Rainer. After all, it is a joint venture car, and it has been famous for so many years.

Rena is more cost-effective after the price reduction.

Recommend K2, the engine is good, the power is considerable, the space is quite large, and it is affordable.

For a car at this price, a car of its own brand is more cost-effective!