Was there a prehistoric nuclear war Is there a possibility of a nuclear war now?

Updated on history 2024-03-03
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The world is full of everything, I can't jump to conclusions, just as the existence of aliens is theoretically existent, but there is no specific facts to prove it, Daxizhou may exist, but there is no evidence to show that aliens also exist theoretically, but according to the evidence that they must exist, so it can only be unwarranted.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    More conclusive evidence is needed!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I have seen too much and thought about it differently from people.

    Now some people are willing to say some nonsense without evidence].

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    There will be no nuclear war.

    1. Nuclear war will cause too much damage to the earth.

    Radiation is a secondary consequence of nuclear **, and it is even more harmful. According to the book "Nuclear Options in the 21st Century", the atomic bomb dropped on Japan caused localized radioactive fallout, in contrast to modern thermonuclear **, which blasts radioactive material into the stratosphere (the middle layer of the Earth's atmosphere), causing a global radioactive fallout. The extent of radioactive fallout depends on whether the bomb is detonated in the air** or on the ground, the former will worsen the global radioactive fallout situation but will reduce the direct impact of the nuclear explosion point; The latter has limited global impact, but can directly destroy the region.

    2. The nuclear bomb is a balancer between countries and serves as a deterrent.

    Due to the existence of nuclear deterrence, even if conflicts occur between countries, most of them are resolved by means of reconciliation, and the possibility of a full-scale war in a conventional ** is very small.

    The relative balance under the conditions of nuclear deterrence has ensured the balance between the great powers and the overall peace in the world so far.

    Although nuclear ** can be used as a counterweight against conventional forces, nuclear ** has a huge danger of destroying mankind and the earth.

    Because of this, there is a high probability that nuclear ** will not appear on the battlefield.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Probably not. The current nuclear ** is mainly a deterrent. Only when the nuclear ** is miniaturized and miniaturized, it will be possible to use it in local wars.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Not yet. ** Whether or not equipment is used depends fundamentally on reciprocal deterrence, and it is difficult to say when the success rate of the US imperialist missile defense system is raised and the cost is reduced.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Nuclear war is unlikely now, because the nuclear-armed countries know that a nuclear war would mean the destruction of the world and would benefit no one. It is nothing more than a game between major powers, a kind of nuclear deterrence.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Suffice it to say this: nuclear war cannot be completely avoided, but the likelihood of it is very, very low.

    The main reason is that nuclear power is basically in the hands of the big powers, and the big countries cannot afford the harm of nuclear war. Because you can't check others, you can still be safe and sound.

    So almost no one is interested in fighting a nuclear war, but there are individual powers that always like to scare people with nuclear **.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    We all know that as long as the war breaks out, it is destined to be someone's **, among which the nuclear war is even more terrifying, the lethality of nuclear ** is extremely strong, after a nuclear war, most of them are not grassy, Japan's Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the best examples, but if there is a nuclear war, in China.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Those who can be nuclear are more rational, and nuclear is suicide.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    It's hard to say that many countries are provoking others these days.

Related questions
24 answers2024-03-03

Scientists have put forward many conjectures about prehistoric civilizations based on the various relics of prehistoric human civilization that have been excavated and discovered today. It is believed that the development of human beings is not as previously imagined, but cyclical, and that there are different civilizations on the earth at different times. >>>More

22 answers2024-03-03

I think that prehistoric civilization exists, and as for the Sun Man, it is one of the cultural relics found by Chinese archaeologists near the Three Gorges. Whether prehistoric civilizations existed or not is one of the topics that has been debated for a long time. But I think there must have been other cultures before our history. >>>More

15 answers2024-03-03

There is no clear evidence that the Xia Dynasty actually existed. >>>More

4 answers2024-03-03

The name of Diao Chan comes from later legends and is not recorded in history. >>>More

5 answers2024-03-03

Atlantis stability is definitely there, human beings are currently on the edge of cognition, in fact, this world has just begun, there are actually a lot of previous civilizations, Atlantis is one of them, but whether it is so high-tech in the propaganda is not known.