Arguments about rules, three sub arguments about rules?

The three sub-arguments regarding the rules are: abiding by discipline and law is the foundation of one's life, abiding by discipline and law is conducive to stability and unity, and abiding by discipline and law cannot be specialized. The awareness of rules refers to the consciousness that comes from the heart and takes rules as the criterion for action. For example, the awareness of abiding by school rules, abiding by laws, abiding by social morality, and abiding by the rules of the game.

Take queuing as an analogy: the order of queuing is the rule of law, everyone can queue is democracy, then everyone is willing to queue is the sense of rules. Without this awareness, democracy and the rule of law are empty.

This most basic consciousness and human nature has to do with conscience, and morality and faith.

The awareness of rules is a kind of consciousness that every citizen in modern society must have. There are three levels of rule awareness, which first refers to the knowledge about rules. For example, do not steal, do not steal, love the country and abide by the law, courtesy and integrity, unity and friendliness, diligence and thrift, dedication and dedication, care for the environment, pay attention to hygiene, abide by school discipline, respect teachers, and so on.

The last level of rule consciousness is that following the rules becomes an intrinsic need of the person. In this realm, following the rules has become the second nature of man, and the external rules have become the inner quality of man.

Respect the rules, know the rules, be familiar with the rules, and don't go against them.

Rules are a safeguard mechanism designed to safeguard the interests of the majority. Where there are no rules, no square circle, and where the rules cannot be covered, they will fall into a state of chaos and disorder.

Respect the rules, but don't be superstitious.

Know how to use the rules to protect yourself, but also think about how to protect your own interests if others don't follow the rules. For example, pedestrians follow the traffic light instructions, wait at the red light, and pass at the green light, but the green light does not mean that they can ignore the auspicious and majestic crossing the road, and they should pay attention to the surrounding environment to prevent the occurrence of vehicles grabbing the red light. The vast majority of rules only use an after-the-fact punishment mechanism to sanction violators, and do not rely on the respect of others for the absolute safety of their own lives.

This principle is suitable. Once the rules are made, most people act under the rules, but don't forget that the rules don't cover everything, such as those who take advantage of the loopholes in the rules.

Rules are beneficial to most people, and rules promote order.

The rules themselves should set boundaries and only one set of rules should apply to the same matter. The juxtaposition of multiple rules may make the transaction more comprehensive, but it can also make the situation more complicated, such as the behavior of different departments playing the ball.

Rules don't exist naturally, they are artificial. There are ** people who make rules, and people who have ideals and feelings improve the rules. On negotiations.

The rule is to run, and the operation is to run.