What is the difference between Nikon D7100 and Canon 60D

Alas, the experts did not get to the point at all: this is the product of two companies.

Just like the various sects in **, if you join a faction, there will be restrictions on joining another faction, and the people of the original sect will scold you lightly, and the heavy ones will hunt you down.

The choice of these two machines, there are a lot of things to consider that are attached to the fuselage:

1. Canon 60D and Nikon D7100 are products of two companies, SLR cameras require lenses, and the lens products of these two companies are incompatible. So, you have to consider your lens situation.

The D and D7100 are products of two eras. Technological developments affect the functionality of both cameras. So it's normal for the D7100 parameter to be higher than the 60D.

3. The consumer layer targeted by these two cameras is also different, 60D above the APSC format 7D, and then the full frame 6D on the top. The D7100 is now directly above the full-width D600. To put it bluntly, the 60D isn't Canon's top-of-the-line APSC model, but the D7100 is now Nikon's top-of-the-line APSC model (the D300 is seriously outdated).

This leads to different consumer groups for the two models. Relatively speaking, 60D is biased towards high-end consumption. Whereas, the D7100 is biased towards entry-level majors.

5. Canon's EF-S lens (i.e., the lens for APSC models) cannot be mounted on a full-frame machine, and it is possible that the camera's reflector may be damaged if forcibly used. Nikon's DX lenses (also APSC-specific lenses) can be mounted on full-frame machines, and the camera automatically crops pixels to DX size to ensure the quality of the film.

To sum up, just looking at the camera, D7100 is a must, first of all, it is new, and secondly, the functions and parameters are high.

However, 60D is not the positioning of the D7100 in the first place. Again, it's time for the 60d to get the next generation. The D7100 has just come out, and the machine on the market does not seem to have arrived.

So, there is no comparison between the two machines right now, it all depends on your positioning.

I personally recommend waiting.

If you have to buy it now, then I recommend the 60D. First of all, the parameters of the fuselage are sufficient, there should be everything, D7100 must be expensive when it is just launched, and 60D has been out for a long time**It's almost there. The second is that Canon's low-end lenses are cheaper, so you don't have to worry about the motor, and you can buy a full-frame lens as much as possible to ensure the use of full-frame machines in the future.

The D7100 doesn't mean much for the average household.

If you want to buy a Nikon machine, I think it would be better to go for the D7000. If you don't consider using a motorless lens, or if you want to focus manually with a motorless lens, it's fine. Then the D5200 is also good.

For professional use, 6D or D600 full frame.

If it is for general household consumption, the demand for lenses is not very large, in fact, you can consider the EOM-M or NEX series.

Nikon D7100 good.

Overall, Nikon's cameras are higher than their Canon counterparts in terms of hardware configuration, but at a lower price point. There is something very substantial in each upgrade of Nikon, and the Canon feels just a change that doesn't hurt or itch. Nikon is professional in terms of functionality, and the layout of the buttons is also easier to operate.