Is the charge for after school services in primary schools considered make up classes in disguise?

The after-school service fee for primary school is not a disguised make-up class, but should be regarded as after-school tutoring, which is good for students' academic performance, tutors are overtime, and overtime needs to be paid to teachers, so it should be normal to reasonably charge a certain fee to students' parents.

It's not a make-up class in disguise, this is a normal fee, the teacher should be paid a reasonable amount for his work after work, and it is much cheaper than the outside tutoring agency, and the teacher's level is also better than the outside, there is no need to go to the tutoring agency again.

Of course, forget it, the school does not charge make-up fees after class, which is a disguised fee or a random fee, which is very shameful.

Since the beginning of the new semester, it is said that many schools have begun to implement "after-school extended time services". The so-called after-school extended service means that the teacher provides academic guidance or related activities to the students after school. There is a policy that after-school extended hours can be charged to students for a nominal fee, the basic principle of which is that students are voluntary and teachers are voluntary.

After-school extended service can appropriately reduce the burden on parents, parents no longer have to worry about tutoring their children with homework, and teachers also have appropriate income.

According to reports, a primary school in Jiaozuo, Henan Province, has carried out an after-school one-hour extended service, charging 100 yuan per student per month, and the service content mainly includes homework assistance, independent reading, club activities, etc., and the school's principal said that more than 1,000 of the school's more than 1,700 students have voluntarily signed up to participate. In this way, the school has an income of 100,000 yuan per month, and if all this money is distributed to tutors, then each tutor will also have a considerable income per month, which can be described as killing two birds with one stone.

But there are also those who question that this is a standard arbitrary charge: this is indeed a disguised charge. 1. First of all, the school was supposed to end at 5 p.m.

2. First of all, on the grounds of reducing the burden on students, it will be changed to 3:30 dismissal. 3. Parents generally get off work at 5 o'clock, and they can't pick up their children at all, and they can't manage their children, so they can only sign up for after-school extended services.

4. In the end, the school still ended at 5 p.m., but the after-school delay fee was charged. Now many schools have 200 yuan a month, and a class of 35 people has 7,000 yuan a month, which is a lot of income for the school.

The after-school extended service says that teachers will be given a certain amount of subsidies, but how many teachers are willing to participate? Originally, I was physically and mentally exhausted after a day of class, and everyone wanted to go home early to rest, so if there was another extended service, it is estimated that there would not be too many teachers who really wanted to participate. If you are a teacher, would you like to participate in after-school services?

Now the tuition fees paid by public schools are too small, so the school has come up with such a way, as a parent, you must be able to understand!

The after-school service fee of the primary school cannot be regarded as the teacher's make-up class in disguise, the primary school is too early, and the parents have not yet gotten off work, so they can't pick it up at all. Delay for a period of time, not only take care of the time for parents to pick up their children, but also help children with homework, and give teachers some financial compensation is deserved.

An elementary school. Students are learning, if after-school services. It's some.

Need. Meals at school. If it is inconvenient for parents to pick up and drop-off, it can be negotiated.

It's nothing. Additional disguised charges. If it's a make-up class.

No matter what form it takes? It's all a charge in disguise. Students are sent to school.

If you give it to the teacher, the teacher is responsible. It is also obligated to teach students well. Some, appeared.

Problems with learning. Teachers should be responsible. Put the students.

Great. It doesn't matter if it's in class or in class, down. It's all.

As one. The duties of a teacher who is highly respected by the community. Otherwise.

I don't take it seriously in class. Students will be charged a make-up fee after class. This phenomenon.

Words that are getting more and more intense. That's really it. One of the great causes of education.

Things that don't get praise. It is detrimental to this title of people's teacher.

The service fee is not a disguised make-up class, but should be regarded as after-school tutoring, which is good for the student's academic performance, the tutor is overtime, and the teacher needs to pay overtime for overtime, so it should be normal to charge a certain fee to the student's parents. The service fee is not a disguised make-up class, but should be regarded as after-school tutoring, which is good for the student's academic performance, the tutor is overtime, and the teacher needs to pay overtime for overtime, so it should be normal to charge a certain fee to the student's parents.

I think it should be calculated, and the primary school began this kind of after-school service, and also charged, which is unreasonable, the teacher answers the questions that students don't understand, it should be, and it should not start to put pressure on them at such a young age, and increase the pressure on the hometown, primary school is more focused on the development of intelligence or something, the cultivation of interest.

After-school services in primary schools are free, and if there is a fee, they are operating in violation of the law, and if there is a fee, it must be a violation of the law and a disguised make-up class.

It is considered a make-up class in disguise, and the fee is charged without the introduction of a policy, which is not in accordance with the regulations and violates the rules and regulations of school education.

Personally, I don't think that the after-school service charge for primary school is not a make-up class in disguise. Perhaps in the consciousness of parents, the school should not charge extra money, and the school's teachers should give supplementary lessons, including some after-school tutoring, should be free. They would rather go out and find an after-school tutoring class than let their homeroom teacher tutor.

The class teacher is also a human being, and the teacher is also a job, and the teacher also needs the salary of this job for his daily expenses and daily life. So let's not limit ourselves to the little money we have in the tuition fee. For children's learning, including children's future development, this little money really doesn't mean to do anything?

If we have some thoughts, it would be good for Yong to work hard to make money, instead of worrying about the after-school service charges, which is the smallest thing. To sum up, look.

I think this should be considered a make-up lesson in disguise. Because what the child learns should be taught in the classroom, not after class, and only think about making up lessons for the child.

Charging for after-school services in primary schools is a disguised make-up class and an improper act of enriching money. Therefore, based on this situation, parents should unite to go to the education department to file a complaint and report, so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of students and themselves.

After-school service fees for primary school students are considered to be make-up classes in disguise, of course, this is a way for schools to collect fees from students, because many parents do not get off work so early and can't pick up their children, the school has seized this opportunity, and it is also an opportunity to make money, and after-school services are charged to help watch children and let them write homework.

No, after-school services should be charged, otherwise, the school arranges after-school service activities, and the relevant funds are not **, how can there be motivation to implement this matter?

Of course, the after-school service fee for primary school is a disguised make-up class, and now the school is charging in this way to seek benefits for school teachers and increase the financial burden of students' parents in disguise.

Primary school after-school service charges are actually a kind of make-up classes in disguise, and the Ministry of Education is not allowed to do so.

Well, in fact, if you charge for after-school services in primary school, this can indeed be regarded as a disguised make-up class, this is very normal, although it is said to be effective, it is eliminated, and parents are in conflict with the student's class time after work, but this is also equivalent to a disguised charge.

In fact, I don't think the after-school service charge for primary school is actually a make-up class in disguise. The main thing is that it still depends on what the individual thinks? Because the teacher is late in service, then you must have to pay the corresponding fee, which is a matter of course.

If it is a voluntary principle, it can not be regarded as a disguised make-up class, now many children will be sent to the tutoring class by their parents after class, if it is to see the teacher after class, then the charge should also be, after all, people are also sacrificing their time on time, and the teacher can not make up for free, after all, it is also necessary to support the family, and at the same time to delay the rest time.

I think that if the after-school service fee is voluntary, it can not be regarded as a disguised make-up class, now many children will be sent to the tutoring class by their parents after class, if they are watching the teacher after class, then the charge should also be, after all, people are sacrificing their time on time. If you don't want to, you don't have to pay.

This must be regarded as a disguised make-up class When we were young, the teacher would be in school, and the children would go to the teacher to ask for homework anytime and anywhere, and now in the form of after-school service fees in primary school, all the children will stay in the school for a kind of learning, which must be regarded as a disguised make-up class.

I think it's a make-up class in disguise, but this is also voluntary by parents, the purpose of parents is to let their children increase some extracurricular knowledge, learn better, and add points for future studies, I think it is feasible, the same teacher has paid time, knowledge to teach you, you have to charge a fee, which is as it should be.

No, because the after-school service in primary schools is very low, the purpose is to allow students to complete homework and reduce the burden on parents, so it is not considered a make-up class.

The after-school service charge of primary school must be a make-up class in disguise, because after class is the free time of the students, at this time, there are teachers to teach students, and they also take the way of charging, so it is already a make-up class in disguise.

First of all, after-school services are not the same as make-up classes.

Secondly, the fee itself is not a make-up lesson.

Therefore, the after-school service fee is not next to make-up classes, let alone make-up classes in disguise.

As for the question of whether the fee itself is reasonable, and whether this matter is a case of illegal make-up classes, it needs to be specifically implemented and ...... in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations

As long as it's a compliant initiative, it's fine. If it is a violation, it will be dealt with in accordance with the regulations.

aqui te amo。

Legitimate. First of all, the after-school service of primary and secondary schools is carried out by the Ministry of Education, which aims to promote the healthy growth of students and help parents solve the difficulties of picking up and dropping off students on time.

The school establishes and improves the after-school service work system of "voluntary application by parents, preliminary examination of classes, approval by the school, and overall arrangement", and on the basis of fully soliciting the opinions of students and parents, it is open and transparent to charge fees, based on demand, and scientifically and reasonably arrange the management of delayed services.

Activity background: after-school service is a kind of social activity due to the contradiction between parents' off-duty time and children's school time, parents get off work late and children get out of school early, resulting in difficulty in picking up and dropping off children in the family, tutoring children's homework, and guiding children to participate in sports, art, and entertainment activities, parents lack time to cultivate children's extracurricular reading, **, art, sports and other after-school interests.

In the past, this problem was for parents to find out-of-school care or training institutions, so that off-campus institutions could provide childcare services or interest class services between after school and before parents get off work. The "Opinions" pointed out that schools can be allowed to introduce qualified off-campus training institutions into schools under the guidance and supervision of the education department to provide after-school services for primary and secondary school students in the school.

Elementary and middle school students are not charged for after-school make-up classes organized by schools