Why Wang Guowei said that the double evidence method can only be done today

In modern times, with the increase in the excavation of cultural relics and ancient artifacts, the study of them has become more and more important. Wang Guowei, Luo Zhenyu and other scholars also compared the contents recorded in the books and documents with the ancient documents and ancient artifacts unearthed underground, and from the comparison, they examined the authenticity and falsehood of the records in the documents, clarified the truth of many historical facts, and achieved fruitful research results, and summarized them theoretically, popularized and introduced, making them an important research method for historians and other scholars, which is called the "double evidence method", also known as "the study of King Luo". Wang Guowei summarized this research method in "New Evidence of Ancient History":

Our generation was born today, and we are fortunate to have materials not only on paper, but also on the underground. From this kind of material, our generation has to correct the materials on the paper, and also prove that a certain part of the ancient book is all true, that is, the words of the hundred schools of **, and there is no fact that it shows one side. This two-fold method of evidence can only be done today.

According to Mr. Chen Yinke's summary, Wang Guowei's "double evidence method" includes three aspects of "double synthesis", namely, the "mutual interpretation" of "underground objects" and "paper relics", the "mutual evidence" of "old books of different races" and "old books of our country", and the "mutual reference" of foreign concepts and "inherent materials", thus making this kind of research far beyond the previous research. This is also the result of Wang Guowei's analysis of the different thinking characteristics of the East and the West, and the influence of the Western scientific spirit.

There are two major streams of Western research: scientism and humanism, the former emphasizes "empirical evidence", pays attention to scientific research, attaches importance to the results of experimental practice, and all conclusions are based on facts, without making any unfounded conjectures, based on objective facts, and excluding abstract speculation; Humanistic research, on the other hand, shifts the focus of research to human beings, attaches importance to their subjective feelings and rational intuitions about the objective world, and attaches importance to the deduction and interpretation of objective things. This is similar to "Sinology" and "Song Studies" in China. Influenced by this, Wang Guowei attaches great importance to the study of evidence, but he can make bold assumptions and rigorous reasoning on the basis of respecting facts and scientific research, and integrate the new with the old, the middle school with the West, and various disciplines.

This kind of insight and research method is the fruit of the unification of Eastern and Western logical thinking and research methods.

Double Evidence Method.

Wang Guowei proposed that the method of combining the discovered historical materials with the records of ancient books to verify ancient history is the "double evidence method".

Origin of the Double Evidence Law:

Wang Guowei used the results of modern archaeology, combined with the historical materials such as the "Historical Records" and the "Book of Han", to make a detailed explanation of a series of related issues involved in the Han and Jin Dynasty wooden tablets, such as the examination of the Han Dynasty's border fortresses and Fengsui, the determination of the location of the Yumen Pass, the location of Loulan and Haitou City, the exploration of the Silk Road in the Western Regions, and the arrangement of the bureaucratic system of the Han Dynasty's border county governors. As a result, he created the "double evidence method", that is, the research method of "materials on paper" and "new materials underground" corroborating each other, which had a great impact on Chinese academic research in the 20th century. A careful examination of Wang Guowei's academic path shows that this method was actually formed when he and Luo Zhenyu jointly interpreted the Han and Jin wooden slips and wrote "Quicksand Falling Janes" during his time in Japan.

Later, he applied this method to the study of oracle bone inscriptions, golden inscriptions and Dunhuang documents, and became a generation of giants who inherited the past and forged ahead into the future.

I think it may be that Confucianism in the Qing Dynasty focused on the study of evidence, so he paid attention to evidence.

The double evidence method refers to the use of ** dedication and handed down documents to corroborate each other. For example, in the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties project, the specific time of the battle of Muye is inferred, which is to use the inscription on the li. The historiographical value of the unearthed documents is quite valuable, and there are many lost documents, or fake books made by later generations, the answer can be found in the unearthed documents.

It has become a habit to bully China, how can we admit this history? As a result, there are constantly Japanese "experts" who say that the "Golden Seal of the King of Hanweinu" is fake. The most proud basis of these "experts" is:

You say that this "golden seal" is real, but from China to Japan, has the second one been unearthed? Speaking of solar energy, people's first impression is that it is environmentally friendly and advanced, and it is a new type of energy that China has vigorously supported the development of in recent years. The excavation of a Western Zhou bronze brought forward the history of Chinese using solar energy to more than 3,000 years ago.

In 2008, more than 2,500 unearthed bamboo slips were donated to Tsinghua University, and it has been determined that they were written during the Warring States period. After sorting out, it was found that there were 138 numbered bamboo slips spelling out an unprecedented history book written by the Chu people in the Warring States Period. The collation team named it "The Year of the Department".

The fallacies recorded in the historical books can be corrected, and the deficiencies in the historical records can be filled, or even completely subverted, changing people's understanding of historical figures and events, making history more comprehensively displayed in front of future generations, and enabling people to have a more comprehensive understanding of history.

<> was heard by Zhang Yizhi and told Wu Zetian, Wu Zetian angrily called Li Xian to reprimand him and asked him to deal with it. Shun put Yao in Pingyang. Shun imprisoned Yao, reinstated Saidan Zhu, so that he would not see his father."

It can be seen that the replacement of Emperor Yaoshun is not a Zen concession. Whether Shun and Yu are Zen or not, it is not known now, it is said that it is Zen Rang, and it is estimated that it is believed in vain. There is also a saying that when Wu Zetian heard his grandchildren talking about his male pet, he was furious and ordered someone to kill two people.

According to legend, the south is the tomb of King Wen of Zhou, and the north is the tomb of King Wu of Zhou. In front of the tomb, there are more than 40 steles erected by Bi Yuan in the Qing Dynasty and the stone steles erected by the Ming and Qing dynasties. So are they the real tombs of the Zhou kings?

In fact, the archaeological results proved that the legend was wrong, and the tomb of King Zhou was actually the tomb of King Qin in the late Warring States period.

Mr. Wang Guowei's double evidence method is the study of ancient history, which refers to the corroboration of historical materials unearthed from the ground, and in modern society, with the large-scale archaeological work, a large number of cultural relics have been excavated and revisited Mr. Wang Guowei's double evidence method. It is of great help to advance historical research.

Mr. Wang Guowei's dual evidence method studies ancient history. The so-called double evidence refers to the verification between the handed down documents and the historical materials unearthed underground to judge the authenticity of historical facts.

Mr. Wang Guowei's double evidence method is to study ancient history, and the so-called double refers to the corroboration of handed down documents and physical historical materials unearthed underground to judge the authenticity of historical facts.

Wang Guowei is a representative of the double evidence method. （）

a.That's right. b.Wrong and blind.

The regular rule is the answer to the canopy: a

Wang Guowei is one of the representatives of the double evidence method. （）

a.That's right. b.Mistake.

Correct answer to prepare for the mu excavation case: a