World Army Power Rankings? Which country has the strongest individual combat capability, and how man

The U.S. Army is the strongest, whether it is combat experience or equipment, the second should be the Israel Defense Forces, and then the Russian Army and the British Army, (here did not join the German Army, after World War II, Germany was very cautious about fighting abroad, but considering the German Army tradition, I personally think that the combat effectiveness is comparable to the U.S. Army) It is difficult to compare individual combat capabilities in modern army operations, and if exercises and some competitions, the strongest individual combat capability is the Chinese Army, But there is no comparison between wars and exercises, as for the ranking of the Chinese Army, everyone has a different opinion, the ranking of some foreign military magazines does not consider combat experience and actual combat effectiveness, just a simple comparison of military equipment and numbers, the Chinese Army is second only to the US Army in these rankings because of the huge number of people and equipment, personal opinion The Chinese Army ranks about 5-6 in the world, has not experienced war for 30 years, and China's strategic theory and tactical thinking are very old, In particular, the level of competence of the commanders at the grassroots level (battalion, company, platoon).

There are only three comparisons between the United States, Russia, and China: According to the ranking published by the World Arms Control and Disarmament Organization, China's army is the strongest, but it is a Western organization, and it is inevitable that there will be acts of exaggerating China's national strength. And that's a number of people, equipment (the overall equipment of the army, including rocket artillery, armored vehicles, etc.) can not be seen from the overall quality of individual soldiers, modern warfare relies on informationization, this group and individual soldiers are the same.

To put it simply, individual soldiers are determined by informatization, training and equipment. Let's take a look at the comparison (A is the best, B is average, C is the worst).

United States, Russia, China.

Informatization: a b c

Degree of Training: B c A

**Equipment: Tie.

Overall, the United States is superior in individual soldiers.

I don't think there's a comparison between the squads of the Army Special Forces of all countries (the Army Special Forces are the elite of the Army), and let them send the strongest teams to fight within a certain range, and the ones who have the last laugh are the strongest.

Germany. Looking at the performance of the German army in World War II, you can see that the first place is definitely not covered, and the current German army still continues the fine traditions of the Germanic people. The military system is reasonable; Soldiers are generally highly educated, basically at the university level; The Germanic peoples of devotion will never lag behind other countries, and the European human abilities are generally stronger; Technical and tactical capabilities were the strength of the German army.

The Germans have always been rigorous, so the level of training in the German army is also very high. The German army's individual soldiers are fully equipped with fierce firepower, and they pay great attention to the cooperation of the arms, especially the mechanized equipment and air-ground cooperative operations, all of which have a high level of literacy, and they also do not ignore melee combat, so their combat effectiveness is very strong. In addition, many of the tactics of special forces operations were pioneered by the German army.

What is the strongest individual combat capability in the world?

The strongest class should be the Scout. The strongest individual combat capability is the scouts, including the scouts and marines in the army special forces forces.

The level of the three armed forces. The army has always been the main force of our army, and now the reform of the structure of our army has been gradually improved, and the level of equipment has also been gradually improved, but due to the bottleneck of technological strength and China's one-child policy, the level of China's army has also declined, but comparatively speaking, it should still be in the forefront of the world in terms of combat effectiveness. If we do not experience war, we will make progress just by watching others fight, but there will definitely be no people who have experienced war to feel the same way, so it is true that our military has not made much progress in military theory, and there is already a big gap between it and the US military and other Western countries.

This is what I have felt over the years, because our army has always used the tactical means and strategic deduction methods of the large-scale military training in the 70 s. This aspect of our army must be strengthened, otherwise on the battlefield there will only be experience gained with the blood of soldiers.

Generally speaking, although China's national defense strength cannot be said to be strong, it should still be very confident in China's territory, after all, it is a vast territory.

Because China is the strongest ...

Who told you that the Chinese army is the strongest in the world. Without the baptism of large-scale modern warfare, no one can say for sure, and if you don't want those paper data, you will be arrogant. Compared with the US military, the first-class equipment obtained by our grassroots troops is shabby and backward, and the firepower is insufficient.

The coordination capacity of the various services is poor. The establishment is chaotic and the coordination ability is poor. The firepower of the grassroots team is poor.

It is no longer the era of relying on large corps and big campaigns, but more relying on team-based and information-based operations. Our country falls far short in this regard. The Air Force is backward, the Army's equipment is outdated and backward, and most of the equipment is dilapidated.

Although equipment is not an absolute element, we lack experience, and the experience accumulated by the US military in one operation after another is better than hundreds of Zhu Rihe military exercises. We should strive to develop our own strength, improve the establishment of our troops, update and modernize our equipment, and modernize our air force on a large scale. Air-ground combat coordination capabilities have been enhanced.

And not the small pilot troops that are now. We should strive to popularize the establishment of a level of equipment like that of the US military. And not here to watch you guys.