Celebrity Violations 50, Celebrity Violations

Gao Xiaosong's wine rack, Manchu Wenjun's drug use,

Legal Analysis: It may constitute the crime of insulting Lu and is punishable by fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights. However, it should be noted that the general abusive behavior infringes on the other party's right to reputation and constitutes civil tort liability, and He Pei shall be detained for up to 5 days or fined up to 500 yuan in accordance with the provisions of Article 42 of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, and if the circumstances are more serious, he shall be detained for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days, and may be fined up to 500 yuan; If the circumstances are serious, such as heinous means, the insulting act causes serious consequences (such as the victim commits suicide due to humiliation, or the insult causes mental disorder, etc.), and the insulting act is carried out multiple times, then the crime of insult is constituted, and the sentence may be up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights.

Legal basis: Article 246 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: Whoever publicly insults others or fabricates facts to slander others by violence or other means, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights.

The crimes in the preceding paragraph are to be dealt with only if they are complained, except where they seriously endanger social order and national interests.

Where the victim complains to the people's court about the conduct provided for in the first paragraph through information networks, but it is truly difficult to provide evidence, the people's court may request that the public security organs provide assistance.

The celebrities themselves have a certain right to decide on privacy. Public figures, especially pure entertainment stars, should be consistent in the scope of the transfer of privacy - they can choose to protect personal privacy from beginning to end, or they can choose to be open to personal privacy from beginning to end. Unauthorized publication of others' private materials or the promotion of others' privacy in written or oral form without their consent, causing others to frankly claim that their reputations are harmed, is to be handled as an infringement of the rights to reputation of others.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 10: Natural persons enjoy rights such as the right to life, the right to body, the right to health, the right to name, the right to portrait, the right to reputation, the right to honor, the right to privacy, and the right to marital autonomy. Legal persons and unincorporated organizations enjoy the right to name, reputation and honor.

Article 1032: Natural persons enjoy the right to privacy. The privacy rights of others must not be infringed upon by any organization or individual by means such as espionage, invasion, leakage, or disclosure. Privacy refers to the tranquility of a natural person's private life and the private space, private activities, and private information that he or she does not want others to know.

Legal analysis: If a celebrity violates the law, or if the banquet should be punished according to the law, it must be dealt with in accordance with the law. No one shall be equal in the application of the law for any offence. No one is allowed to have privileges beyond the law.

1. If a celebrity violates the law, he must be dealt with in accordance with the law if he should be punished according to the law. II[Legal basis].