What is the follow up situation of Simba s fake bird s nest?

Simba, the anchor with the largest number of Kuaishou fans, was pushed to the forefront because of the fake bird's nest incident. Because of the quality of bird's nest, it involves a large number of problems related to live broadcasting, as well as many social problems related to consumers, such as product quality and after-sales. After Simba made a public letter of apology and promised to pay compensation to the relevant consumers, it seems that the matter is still not over.

According to statistics, nearly 24 million yuan has been paid for this bird's nest Simba, but most consumers have not been compensated. At the same time, the manufacturer of the bird's nest has also undergone a change in equity, and believes that there will be more changes in the future, and the relevant departments will not let this matter end just for compensation.

The form of live streaming is a new industry after the rise of the Internet, and everyone has always seen the glamour of live streaming, but ignoring such a rapidly developing industry, which is similar to pulling out seedlings to help grow, and there must be a lack of certain supervision and industry norms. It is precisely because of the lack of norms that the rights and interests of many consumers will not be protected, but there is also no way to complain. Such a contradiction must be becoming more and more prominent under the rapid development of the live broadcast industry.

Simba, as an anchor who claims to be for the benefit of the people, but sells such products to consumers, which really shouldn't be. This also shows a disadvantage of an anchor group, they often don't know much about the product, but just blindly tell consumers that this thing is good, in fact, it is the same as the TV shopping in the past. However, the anchor industry is mixed, which is also a very important reason why Simba's bird's nest will have problems this time, they are not too professional to distinguish the quality of the goods.

Simba's bird's nest incident this time should be said to have ruined Simba's reputation for so many years. But that's why Simba and his team are so confident. The latter consumers who have not been compensated believe that they will be able to get compensation, after all, the public is watching this matter, and it is not okay if they do not pay.

The follow-up situation is that now he has lost 24 million, and at the same time, he has been boycotted and morally criticized by many people, and he himself has issued an apology statement, and he has also paid a terrible price for this matter.

faced with a false penalty of three fines, and a huge fine, and then was named and criticized by CCTV, and it will be more difficult to bring goods in the future.

Since this incident, Simba has apologized to the public and said that people make mistakes. Every business has its own time or two when it goes down the wrong path. Now the attention of this matter is still high.

Simba's follow-up situation with fake bird's nest is that the law has intervened in this matter, and it is very likely that he has touched the law and faces a prison sentence.

Although he has now fulfilled his promise to return the money, it will not save his reputation if he does so, and in this case, the public security organs have intervened in the investigation, and if it is determined that the situation is true, he may face criminal punishment.

Faced with the problems of product quality caused by this kind of online shopping, how should consumers respond?

1.How can I tell if the operator's actions constitute fraud?

2.Simba is only live broadcasting, will it also be liable for compensation?

3.If you buy a fake, you can ask for a refund of one and pay three, and how to compensate for the refund of one and three here?

4.Some people may have heard the saying that the compensation is ten times the amount, so is this compensation standard applicable in the fake bird's nest incident?

No. Everyone is not a fool, this kind of serious deception of consumers really shouldn't be forgiven, and Simba's character is problematic, and such a person will have a bad impact on others if he starts a live broadcast.

Fans won't pay for this, people are haunted by what happened before, and they also feel very disappointed and won't believe him anymore.

will definitely not pay for it, because Simba's previous behavior is very disgusting to fans, so many fans will not continue to believe him.

They won't pay for it, because Simba deceived them and caused them financial losses, and Simba did it very badly.

No. His behavior has chilled the hearts of fans, and fans will not choose to forgive.

Fans won't pay for it, because it's useless to apologize, and it can be seen from the act of selling fakes that Simba has a problem with his character.

Looking back, this incident, let more people know about bird's nest, is a good thing for the industry, and it is also a good opportunity to strengthen market supervision, whether it is the bird's nest industry or the live broadcast industry, the norm has a future, this matter for our regular bird's nest importers, the same sounding alarm, can not fool consumers, only sincerity, in order to gain the trust of consumers, the road can go far.

Looking back, this incident has made more people know about bird's nest, which is a good thing for the industry, and it is also a good opportunity to strengthen market supervision, whether it is the bird's nest industry or the live broadcast industry, the norm has a future, this matter is also a wake-up call for our regular bird's nest importers, and consumers can not be fooled, only sincerity can gain the trust of consumers, and the road can go far.

The impact of Simba's fake bird's nest incident on him is not small and quite big, so the name that affects him is the most important thing, and these counterfeits must be severely punished.

Simba's fake bird's nest incident is mainly due to the false sale of this well-known anchor, if it is really confirmed that the false sale is made, then the relevant departments must vigorously investigate. Consumers need to be given justice.

Simba's fake bird's nest incident caused him a bad reputation, so he also paid the main responsibility, and he had to crack down this incident. It is forbidden to sell some fakes.

Hello! Simba, as a star, still engages in fake bird's nest, which is a great blow to the health care product industry.

Simba must be responsible for the fake bird's nest, since he knows that it is a fake and buys it for his fans, then he has violated the law and must accept the punishment of the law.

and the Simba fake bird's nest incident, maybe she didn't have an in-depth investigation when she made the endorsement, the bird's nest may be fake, he made the endorsement, this will pay attention to learn a lesson in the future, don't do this kind of thing again.

Simba's fake bird's nest incident is very big, and the impact on him personally is also very powerful, so you must be down-to-earth and reliable, and don't sell fakes.

Hello! I think this kind of fake bird's nest is to deceive the interests of consumers and is irresponsible to the majority of consumers, so we must severely punish this kind of counterfeit behavior!

Simba's fake drug nest incident, deceiving consumers, illegal fraud. No matter what he has done, he should be severely punished by the law, and he cannot be tolerated and connived. Because this matter has a particularly large impact, it is necessary to give an explanation to the majority of consumers.

It's just that sometimes when you're in the position of the tree move and the state of Martha, many people will be jealous of you, so they will create some incidents to slander you.

A team can't be impeccable in everything, Simba's fake bird's nest incident tells us a truth, we still have to be low-key and low-key, if it weren't for Simba's donation to attract attention, who would be interested in selling fakes on an online live broadcast.

Simba sells fake bird's nest, and Internet celebrities should really consider consumers, and should not deceive consumers with a bad conscience. Internet celebrities have lost the trust of their fans.

Simba's fake bird's nest incident is actually very normal, as long as it is profitable, there will always be shoddy phenomena in the market, as long as there is strong demand, counterfeiting is inevitable.

Simba's fake bird's nest incident, because he is very influential in the industry, his behavior of selling counterfeits is also relatively bad, and there are many problems on the Internet, and I hope that the relevant departments will strengthen supervision.

Simba's Fake Bird's Nest Incident. It still has a lot of responsibility, the reason why he didn't check the goods carefully, or the reason why he didn't have enough responsibility? But he's the anchor. It's okay in all respects or as a whole.

There is nothing to ask about selling fake bird's nests, and it is okay to compensate in time, but his attitude is very bad, he regards himself as a big name, what he said is right, he sells fakes as real and has to pursue other people's legal responsibilities, so he ignores the law and gives him a strict punishment, so he can know how many catties and taels he is.

Simba's fake bird's nest incident, this should be his own lax control to let these bad merchants take advantage of the loopholes, these big anchors should pay attention to the following in the future, don't ruin their future in order to make money.

The words of this fake bird's nest incident reflect the current industry-wide deceptive consumption. The implementation of the words is an unfair treatment for the people, and it also proves that the supervision department of a listed food, a quarantine spot check is not in place.

It is the result of people's pursuit of excessive enjoyment, and if no one buys Ye Luo, no one will have nails. Just like Moutai and Wuliangye in Huizhong. Because the ** is high, there is a profit to be made, so it is faked here.

Chinese do not have He Yanbo, there are no healthy people who eat bird's nest, and there are many people who do not necessarily eat bird's nest. Just be healthy. So to screen.

The harm of material comforts.

Simba's fake bird's nest incident should be taken seriously, and deceptive consumer behavior should be punished by law.

Fake, Simba has already apologized for compensation.

After more than 50 days of turmoil in the Simba bird's nest incident, Simba's one-month late apology and the compensation plan of "one refund and three compensations" finally came. Some netizens calculated an account according to the information disclosed by Simba and found that the return on this "investment" was as high as 300%.

Simba mentioned in his response: a total of 57,820 orders, with a sales amount of 15.5 million yuan, and a total of 61.98 million yuan needs to be refunded first. It is equivalent to 268 yuan per order, and the refund of one and three is equal to the loss of four orders, and the compensation amount for each single is 1072 yuan.

It's fake.

Simba's sale of "Bird's Nest in Sugar Water" in the live broadcast room has aroused heated discussions, and some consumers have questioned whether the Mingzhi brand "Little Golden Bowl Bird's Nest Rock Candy Instant Bird's Nest" sold in the live broadcast room of Simba's apprentice Shi Da Mei is sugar water instead of bird's nest. Subsequently, Simba and his apprentice Shi Damei showed the test report of the product in the live broadcast room and conducted on-site tests to confirm that there was no problem with the product.

Subsequently, Wang Hai posted the test report of the product and said, "After testing, Xin Xuan's official Weibo Xin Youzhi xyz is sugar water when the flavored drink of bird's nest fools fans." According to the test results, the sucrose content of the product is 4 8, and the carbohydrate in the ingredient list is 5, which confirms that the product is sugar water. ”

At the same time, Douyin's anti-counterfeiting blogger "Sun Paipip" pointed out through the analysis of the ingredients of the above-mentioned bird's nest products that the main ingredients of this bird's nest are actually sodium alginate and calcium lactate. According to the Food Safety Law, calcium lactate should not be included in the bird's nest product, which is classified as a "flavored drink".

A professional counterfeiter named Wang Hai joined the accusation against Simba, pointing out that the bird's nest is sugar water, and the test report posted by Wang Hai shows that the "efficacy" substance contained in 100 grams of bird's nest sold by Simba is only worth one yuan, not even one dollar. At the same time, the sucrose content of the product, carbohydrates 5%, protein content is 0.

Simba's investigation and handling of the "fake bird's nest" incident was announced, because Simba was not involved in a criminal offense, he was only involved in the promotion of the product, not involved in the production. What he did wrong was that he exaggerated the effect of the product and misled consumers. When consumers complained that the product quality was not good, they did not test whether the product quality was good at the first time, and the matter fermented to the end, exposing too many things, before apologizing.

Now the problems exposed by live streaming are now countless. may be because when the live broadcast brings goods, the anchor pays attention to his commission and commission, and often ignores the quality of the product. I felt that it would be okay to sell it, and I felt that I was at ease with that salary.

As everyone knows, it wasn't himself who was hurt in the end. As long as you have a criminal record, it is impossible for the audience to believe you brainlessly in the future. People have their own judgment, and they don't say that they fall in the same place.

It's not good, there will be a lot of fans, from pink to black, after a long time, it will become less and less popular, more and more unpopular, more and more uncarable, and in the end, it will be completely cool and become an outdated Internet celebrity. You can't do live broadcasts with the mentality that making a sum is a sum and running away if you make a penny.

Some time ago, when some anchors brought goods live broadcast, they brought tickets in some scenic spots. The audience thinks that there is really a advantage to take advantage of, but what is the result? After arriving at the place, consumption is mandatory in the scenic spot.

In the end, I was not happy, and I had to suffer a lot of anger, which was completely more than worth the loss. The only good thing about live streaming is that if something really happens, you can find that kind of anchor, if you need to compensate or something, it is more secure, after all, the economic strength of some anchors is really very, very strong.

Integrity management is the long-term solution. Don't do something bad for the sake of momentary gain. Only if you treat others sincerely, others will always support you.