What do you think of the book The Dumb House ?

There are a thousand Hamlets in the hearts of a thousand people. Personal opinions are often mixed with subjective elements. When I first watched the dumb house, it was recommended by my classmates, and I watched the second part directly, when I was in the aesthetic fatigue of orthodox history, and suddenly found such a smart history**, my eyes suddenly lit up, and I felt that Xuanse was very creative, and the details of history were also in place, such as the clothing, food, housing and transportation of the characters, small actions, and the description of the trinkets were very in line with history.

The plot also has new ideas, not sticking to but looking at the development of the whole thing from the perspective of later generations or people at the time, but a combination of ancient and modern, with the idea of the times and the ancients, and sometimes commenting on events from a historical perspective. There is a main plot in each short story, although the dumb house in the early stage is still a little broken in terms of connection, but later it may be that fans have higher requirements for the main plot, or she herself is becoming more and more proficient in writing skills, and the third and fourth main plots are still coherent.

Many students accepted the premise of the book without understanding history and believed it in it. Not only did they believe it, but they also spread it as if it were true history. It's good that "The Dumb House" makes children interested in antiques and history, but it would be terrible if that interest was based on a misunderstanding of history.

Many students have an outrageously low knowledge of history and culture......Really, it's good to read more books, but there are some books that you have to know that they are fake before you can read them.

Two words, disgusting. I remember that in the afterword of a book (I don't know which one or each one comes later), the author said, "History is a little girl with heavy makeup, and I just want to remove her makeup." In this regard, I would like to say that the author's act of writing this book has no resemblance to "removing makeup from a girl".

The author claims to be "removing the makeup of the little girl of history", but as far as I know, the author is neither a researcher nor a time machine in the academic field of history, so why can she say that she is "removing the makeup of history"? She kept saying that "(dumb house) this is made up by her own brain" and "this is not the official history", and indeed in the text, she continues to mislead the reader without changing her face and heartbeat, trying to make them believe that what is depicted in the text is the historical facts. This is, in fact, pure historical nihilism.

The more you write, the worse it gets, and the height is forcibly raised. To be honest, it should have been over a long time ago, and I had to write it. And there is no stalk can only be written more and more badly, the more Xuan Se writes, the worse it is not my family's words, many readers have reacted, ** will be official and even hereby issued a statement, at that time Xuan Se's statement was roughly summarized:

It's not because my writing is rotten, it's because my later writing is more profound, you can't understand it. It's hard for you to understand things between emperors.,It's not as simple as the previous books.,It's not love.。 My understanding of this is:

But you can't even be reluctant to love **, are you really panicking if you hold yourself so high?"

I have many classmates who have bought and read the book "Dumb House", and I have read a few articles out of curiosity. The plot is good, and the writing is good, but there is a lot of fiction and embellishment of history in it. Children who do not have a correct view of history should still avoid reading such books, which will do more harm than good.

When I was in the third year of junior high school, wow, it was a masterpiece, the boss was so handsome and able to learn historical knowledge, and he stole 100 yuan from his mother to buy a full set. Now that I'm a sophomore in high school, I really want to throw away that set of books. Anyway, when you see more, you won't feel how this Jack Sue Mary Sue is doing.

At first, I disliked it because I had a feeling that I had been deceived, but a friend said it well, it is also something I liked, even if I don't like it, there is no need to deny my youth, this is the best you have seen at that age. If you want to read it, read it online, don't buy a physical book, so as not to regret it in the future.

After reading the update of the bosom friend comic that my cousin bought, if Xiaobo is a comic line written completely according to the original lines, then Xuanse can't even figure out the ancient name. Call yourself and shout your own words, you are very domineering. Don't complain about the chaotic "I" and "you" in Wenbai, this tone is simply funny.

And it is very easy to make bugs, such as "er" and "you" after the Warring States period is from top to bottom, respect to inferiority, and respectful and honorific titles are used, unless they are particularly intimate. However, the people inside are all calling "Thou". There is also a "me" in the pre-Qin period, and Hu Shi and others have also studied the difference between me and me.

Does Xuan Se think that the use of "I" is very modern and not suitable for her ancient works? (By the way, this article can complain about a lot of tricky **). Because I can't remember whether this is the pot of the original book or the pot of the comics, I just want to say that if you are not familiar with ancient texts, you don't have the skills to write at least the lines of the old TV series Red Mansion or the Three Kingdoms, so don't write ancient texts.

Writing works with ancient backgrounds at least memorize ancient Chinese, okay, not to mention her assumptions about ancient life. People who have no accumulation and only brains can only be called "writers", not "writers".