Are the results of the runaway Mercedes test out?

What is the cause of Mercedes high-speed runaway?

Recently, a message of "running out of control at 120km h for 1 hour" has swiped the screen. Is this stupid? Or is it conspiracy hype?

Technically, cruise control is based on the control of the fuel supply system by the on-board computer, which can suppress the speed of the vehicle. The computer that controls the fuel supply can't control the automatic transmission, let alone the braking system. This technology has been widely used in the industry for many years, and it is very mature.

Especially for a high-end car like Mercedes-Benz, it is contrary to common sense to say that it is out of control. There's also the argument that the brakes and gears are out of order, which is technically. What's even more ridiculous is that a Mercedes was also invented, which controls the vehicle through background operations.

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class has not yet reached the level of autonomous driving L5 and does not have a remote control system at all. How do I work in the background? There's also a way to open the door and slow down the vehicle, which is really laughable.

Owners seem to know less about Mercedes technology.

Conspiracy? This case is reminiscent of Toyota's "brakegate" incident in the United States. In the end, the United States ** concluded that the vehicles with brake failure reached the maximum speed of the engine at that time, and the truth of the incident is self-evident.

Although the so-called runaway problem is different from the "brake door", the essence seems to be the same. To make matters worse, of course, the Toyota owner initiated a class action lawsuit and claims process, and the Mercedes owner seemed more polite.

It is a historical stage of the transformation from traditional cars to intelligent cars. In the process of this transformation, people do not know much about automated control systems, so it is normal for distrust to generate some fear. In particular, Tesla has also had some traffic accidents in the state of self-driving, which has deepened people's doubts about the self-driving system.

The so-called Mercedes-Benz riot case arose in this context.

Obviously, autonomous driving is far more complex than cruise control. If cruise control can be a problem, then the reliability of the autopilot system is even more important. In addition, Mercedes-Benz, as a luxury brand, has received much more attention in society than other brands, and with some bizarre stories, it has all the ingredients to become an "Internet celebrity".

Is it a conspiracy? We continue to monitor the development of the event, and if we want to achieve a certain business goal, we estimate that the possibility of a delay is too great.

Due to the fiery spread of the incident, some ** exaggerated the matter. The reason why the owner was unharmed in the end was because Mercedes-Benz after-sales service used the "black technology" remote operating system to troubleshoot. Of course, Mercedes-Benz officially issued a statement on this report on cruise control:

An expert technical team has been set up to conduct a round-robin investigation, and Mercedes-Benz does not have the technology to intervene in the vehicle in the background.

Millions of car purchase subsidies.

On May 27, Beijing Benz issued a statement agreeing with the judicial appraisal opinion made by a forensic appraisal agency on the vehicle involved. The appraisal showed that on March 14 this year, the braking system of the vehicle suspected of losing control of cruise control was good and fault-free, and after repeated tests, the car's cruise control system was normal. Mr. Xue, the owner of the car, said he respected the results, but had doubts about one data.

Henan** responded that the appraisal results have not been received from official channels at present, and the handling opinions will not be released until the follow-up investigation.

There has been a new development in the incident, but some questions from the public remain unanswered: Is this judicial opinion made by both parties involved the final result? If the vehicle system involved is normal, how can the owner's behavior be explained? How to deal with the legal issues involved in the incident?

First of all, it should be clear that this incident is not simply a dispute between consumers and manufacturers over the use of products. It happens on public roads, whether it is for people or cars, and the driving state at that time has seriously threatened public safety. Imagine, a car at a speed of 120 kilometers per hour on the highway "out of control" for nearly an hour, if there is no Henan and Shaanxi provinces traffic police and road management personnel efficient rescue, proper disposal, the consequences will be unimaginable.

Therefore, it is necessary to always investigate the facts and clarify responsibilities from the perspective of safeguarding public safety.

At present, neither the owner nor Mercedes-Benz has filed a lawsuit, and no case has been filed for investigation on this matter, and the incident has not yet entered the judicial process. The Ministry of Justice's "General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedures" stipulates that judicial appraisal institutions shall uniformly accept judicial appraisal entrustment from case-handling organs. At present, this judicial appraisal opinion is entrusted by the parties involved, and can only be used as the basis for the two parties to distinguish responsibilities, and cannot be used as the final result.

In order for a self-commissioned judicial appraisal opinion to have legal effect, it must also be submitted to the court as evidence after the case is accepted, and its validity can only be determined after the court cross-examines and adopts it correctly.

Moreover, even if the two parties do not disagree with this judicial opinion, it will not affect the actions of the law enforcement authorities. If the vehicle is identified as normal, then the owner of the car, Mr. Xue, reported to the police that the vehicle was out of control and speeding, forcing the traffic police to use a large number of police forces to coordinate road conditions, clean up toll stations, and maintain traffic order along the way for 100 kilometers. Is there any behavior such as reporting false police and drag racing?

Is it suspected of disrupting the order of public transportation and violating the Public Security Administration Punishment Law? If the vehicle is "out of control" caused by the owner, is it suspected of constituting the crime of dangerous driving or the crime of endangering public safety?

At present, the owner of the vehicle involved has not submitted materials that can strongly prove the condition of the vehicle at that time, and it cannot be proved that the vehicle itself caused the loss of control. The place where the incident occurred ** also said that the appraisal did not go through the traffic management department, and it was not a third-party appraisal agency entrusted by them. Therefore, there is still a lot of follow-up work to be done in the investigation of the incident.

A news of "runaway Mercedes-Benz running at a speed of 120 kilometers per hour for an hour" attracted the attention of the whole network.

It has been a week since the incident, and everyone was surprised by the Mercedes-Benz failure at the beginning, and then questioned from all sides.

So is the owner of the car a play? Is it the car out of control, or the person out of control?

The "runaway car" incident is probably like this: On the evening of March 14, Mr. Xue's Mercedes-Benz sedan in Henan Province lost control after starting the cruise control and kept speeding on the highway at a speed of 120 kilometers per hour.

In the earliest reports, the owner was able to stop the car because of Mercedes-Benz's back-end system to operate the car.

But Mercedes-Benz says it doesn't have the technology to intervene in the background in the background.

Runaway car" quickly passes through the toll booth.

Since then, most people in the industry have expressed doubts.

For example, racing driver @Hanhan: There are too many strange things about this matter, which goes beyond my understanding of car knowledge and driving knowledge. Shouldn't the evidence be sealed immediately?

Founder of Autohome @李想: The Mercedes-Benz incident is like a deranged driver making up stories to drunk reporters.

In the face of the doubts of @Han Han @ Han Lu @ Li Xiang and many netizens in the past few days, Mr. Xue, the owner of the car, has said that he will publish the driving record if necessary to "slap his face".

Question 1: Why is the "Runaway Mercedes-Benz" driving record not announced for a long time?

Mr. Xue, the owner of the car: "I haven't seen it yet?" It's possible that the dash cam also crashes, what if it doesn't record? Even I don't know if there is. ”

After that, @王志安多次提出想看行车记录仪, they were all rejected by the owner.

Question 2: Why did you just escape death and drive a "runaway Mercedes-Benz" on the road?

The traffic police suggested staying overnight or changing the means of transport, and Mercedes-Benz offered to provide a replacement vehicle that night.

Mr. Xue: It's no problem to test it yourself. The reason why he insisted on driving the vehicle involved to Chengdu for 800 kilometers was because the company had a very important activity and responsibility. You have to feed you, right?

Question 3: Is there a speed of 120 when breaking through the toll station checkpoint?

Han Han once questioned: "The speed of the vehicle out of the highway toll gate is not like 120 kilometers per hour. Personally, I feel like it's around 80. ”

To this, Mr. Xue responded that these are just speculations: ". .There will definitely be a delay in the surveillance cameras, but the speed is definitely 120. ”

Question 4: Is "Runaway Mercedes-Benz" really rely on the door to slow down to save your life?

Because he couldn't stop, the traffic police suggested rubbing against the guardrail to slow down, but Mr. Xue said that he was very nervous at the time and mistakenly thought that he was letting himself jump out of the door.

Wang Zhi'an: "Don't you confirm such a dangerous action?" ”

However, whether the Mercedes-Benz owner is lying, whether the car is out of control, or the person is out of control, first of all, a third-party test report is needed to determine whether the vehicle's cruise control system is out of order.

There is only one truth.

I'm on site (xhswzxc) comprehensive finishing.

On March 16, Mr. Xue said that the process of the incident was consistent with public reports, and that he had been communicating with Mercedes-Benz at the time of the incident, and the other party reminded him to cut off the power, turn off the engine, and use the electronic handbrake to brake the vehicle, but there was no effect. Later, he tried to open the car door, but felt that the car was unstable, so he had to close the door. He introduced that the final vehicle stopped or by opening the door, which was guided by Mercedes-Benz, after he opened a door, the vehicle began to automatically slow down, and finally dropped to twenty or thirty kilometers per hour, at which time the brakes could be used.

According to reports, Mr. Xue said that he is an amateur racing driver, and he encountered many dangerous situations during the race, such as Liupanshui in Guizhou and Zhangye in Gansu. At that time, the senior mechanic of Mercedes-Benz contacted him many times and told him how to cut off the power, brake, change neutral gear, etc. (try to reduce speed and stop), but there was no response. When the car is out of control, only the steering wheel can control the whole car.

This seems to be a cruise control failure.

It is said that it stopped by repeatedly opening and closing the door, and the follow-up has not been seen.

Is the interior of self-esteem soft.