Which is better 4 core Core i5 vs 4 core AMD bulldozer?

Overall performance Intel quad-core Core i5 is not as good as AMD Bulldozer Octa-core AMD Bulldozer has quad-core six-core octa-core while Core i5 surpasses Bulldozer six-core and quad-core lower than octa-core.

Which is better, Intel or copying AMD's quad-core processor, this topic is very general. Reason:

1. If they are all quad-core processors, they must be much better than Intel.

2. Intel quad-core processors, now generally i5 and i7 processors, and the popular i5 processors, ** more than 1,000 yuan. And the popular i7 processor, ** is around 2 thousand.

3. AMD quad-core processor, the most popular grade is AthlonX4 (Athlon quad-core) 860K**400 or so, the highest grade is A10 series, AMD APU series A10-7870K, ** around 8 hundred.

4. Of course, the performance and stability are also determined. In terms of performance, Intel quad-core is also much higher than AMD quad-core.

Do you mean laptop processors? In the laptop space, AMD's quad-core processor is scum, and the i5 is much better than it. In the desktop field, the i5 is quad-core, and it is a few streets away from the AMD quad-core processor.

Usually between the dual-core i3-6100 and the octa-core AMD FX8300, there are many people who will choose the former (including me......）

Because the single-core performance of the desktop i3 is relatively outstanding, and the FX8300 is a typical performance of agricultural enterprises: multi-core battle E3, the single core is stepped on by Pentium.

Most programs (especially games) tend to have higher requirements for a single core, and the use of multiple cores is generally only found in big games and some professional rendering tools (such as AE).

Coupled with the high power consumption of FX8300, some people will choose i3 between dual-core and octa-core.

Not to mention that compared to AMD's quad-core, there is no doubt that the i3 is better, especially the mainstream i3-6100 and the i3-7100, which will be widely distributed immediately.

Note: If you are talking about the laptop, then there is no doubt that the i3 is better, and if it is some ** AMD, then you must be able to buy the i5-6200U or higher configuration at the same price.

This needs to look at the model,i3 6100 and AMD860K performance comparison,It's i3 6100 stronger,860K is mainly weak game performance,The core performance is not as good as i3,Multi-program and open more games860K is a bit of an advantage,Overall, now i3 6100 is stronger than most AMD quad cores,

Depending on the specific model, AMD is usually not selected for INTRE

It depends on the specific model, but in general the Core i3 is better than the AMD quad-core. After all, the big brands are there.