Is it reasonable for universities to give extra points to students who donate blood?

It is very reasonable, this practice of the school is to encourage blood donation, which is a charitable act, if you feel unreasonable, you can donate blood yourself, and you can add credits when you get a blood donation certificate.

In addition to responding to the call for blood donation, how to scientifically, reasonably and effectively save blood is a very important work content of medical institutions. This year, the adjustment of the national blood donation policy, coupled with the fact that the hospital has a well-known international and domestic well-known discipline, poses a challenge to the hospital's blood use.

To this end, the hospital has strengthened the rational, scientific and economical use of blood in its ideology and strengthened the management of blood use through the establishment of a highly complete clinical blood management system, the improvement of clinical technology, extensive training and publicity of the culture of blood conservation. And through the storage of self-transfusion, acute isovolacic hemodilution and ** self-transfusion, etc., to make a fuss on "source saving".

The controversy brought about by the incentive policy was also unexpected by the school. The school rewards students for blood donation, which is an affirmation of blood donation, but students should not use it as a means to add points. In the publicity and guidance of blood donation, schools should also pay attention to the social significance of blood donation and the benefits to the human body.

The existence of this policy still makes some students who cannot donate blood feel unfair. They were rejected due to objective physical reasons such as weight, blood type, and health, and in the face of the policy of donating blood extra points, students who rushed left and right in the competitive pressure such as scholarships and employment had a feeling of unfairness.

Donating blood for extra points is harmful to the public good.

Unpaid blood donation. It is a conscious behavior, and colleges and universities should vigorously advocate that the school's bonus behavior can play a role in promoting and guiding unpaid blood donation, which is understandable. However, the behavior of students participating in blood donation for the purpose of bonus points is out of selfishness and utilitarianism, which makes the public welfare activities of the society taste different!

Regarding the unfairness brought by the "blood donation bonus points" to the scholarship evaluation, some students strongly oppose the measure. At the forum, a student said: "The scholarship is mainly an affirmation and praise for excellent academic performance, and we should not go to great lengths to make a fuss about public welfare in order to get a scholarship or get certain titles."

In addition, some students left messages on the Internet, expressing their opposition to the school's bonus point policy: "Blood donation itself is a voluntary public welfare activity, and there should not be so many incentives, which will make everyone feel that blood donors do not have the intention to do good deeds, but will cause a counterproductive effect: people who really want to donate blood are afraid of being ridiculed as 'speculation' by others and discouraged!"

As a college student, I decided not to participate in the voluntary blood donation activities during the university, and to donate is also on the job, the university is a paradise for emancipating the mind and studying freely rather than a dark and rotten hell!!