The company stipulates that employees will be fired if they take out their lunch 3 times, can this e

It's hard to avoid waste effectively, and it's very inhumane.

If you don't eat something that doesn't taste good, you may vomit it out if you eat it. If it is not delicious, it will be poured out, if it is not delicious and hard to eat, the physiology will not be able to stand it, and if you vomit, the waste will be more serious. Before dismissing an employee, should the canteen first review whether the food it makes is good or not, and whether the quality of the food is up to standard.

I once ate overnight food in the cafeteria, and it smelled a little strange and I didn't eat it. After another more frugal colleague ate it, he had acute gastroenteritis the next day and spent hundreds of yuan ......

If I had been fired after 3 times, I might have been able to leave my job many times because of the food I ate in the company cafeteria.

Meals are based on actual needs, not per capita portions. Many canteens are in the case of cooking, it is according to **, anyway, a person's standard is two dishes and two meats, then I will give you the portion, as for whether you like to eat it or not, whether you can eat it or not, it is not something I need to consider.

As a result, female colleagues often can't finish eating, while some male colleagues can't eat enough ......This is the actual waste, and it is this link that needs to be improved, rather than forcing employees to eat. When asking employees, explain the approximate amount to the chef in the canteen, and try to make sure that they can eat and be full, which is a more reasonable plan.

The company's starting point is a good thing, but it is necessary to "do personnel". In fact, many companies have good intentions when promoting new regulations, such as "you will be fired if you throw out lunch 3 times", in order to avoid employees wasting food, such a purpose is worthy of recognition. However, what kind of problems may be encountered in the implementation of such a provision may not have been actually considered by the person who formulated the regulation.

Of course, it may also be that the people who make the rules have a small stove in the canteen every day, so they can't understand why the employees want to throw out their lunches, so that after the rules come out, they get a ...... of scolding

I don't think it can be, and it may also make employees dissatisfied and reduce their enthusiasm for production, which is a negative way. Rewards can be set for lunches instead of being punished in reverse.

Waste can be avoided. After all, employees are here to earn money, and this regulation is not a loss for employees, and they will generally abide by it, after all, it is not easy to find a job.

In order to keep their jobs, they won't waste any more, so it will definitely be effective, but I hope that in the future, there is no need to use this kind of forced way to make everyone establish a sense of saving food, but everyone can act consciously.

The company stipulates that employees will be dismissed if they dump the company lunch at will 3 times, do you think this is reasonable and fast? It shouldn't be reasonable to be honest. Because whether it is the labor law or some other provisions on labor security rights, you will not be dismissed directly because of wasting food.

But now, it may be that we are all following the rules that refuse to waste food. The company may also want to have a good education for its employees in this regard. There is no provision for this move in the Lao Huaichang imitation law, but there is one point that is lead fiber:

First, stand at the company level

For the company's lunch, even if it is charged, the charging standard is relatively low compared to the outside, and the company definitely does not want employees to waste. If the company is offering a free lunch, it is really not appropriate to throw it away. If you don't like to eat or feel that your lunch needs to be improved, you can give your opinion, and it is the most unwise thing to throw away your lunch.

Second, stand on the moral level

Due to the impact of the new crown pneumonia, there will be an increase of 100 million hungry people this year, there will be 100 million hungry people in the world, fortunately we are not hungry people, but endless waste will increase the food burden, we can't ** in the future will we not be that hungry people. It's like "saving water", it's not that we can't pay the water bill, it's because water resources are precious. In the same way, the "CD-ROM Campaign" is being implemented now, not because we cannot afford to buy a meal, but because we must learn to cherish every grain of food.

Summary: A bowl of rice rises to the moral level, which seems to most people to be a bit of a fuss, but bowl after bowl, what we lose is the food we depend on for survival, don't wait until one day to regret the recklessness now. The above are some of my personal suggestions and ideas, for reference only, I hope it can help you.

If you encounter such a problem in your life, you should go to the labor bureau to solve it, so that you can get a good protection, and Yansheng can get a good protection of rights, and the other party has no right to do this, which violates the labor law.

For the company's chain chain Hu practice, some netizens think that the regulation is reasonable, and this move is an effective means to solve the long-term waste of unit meals, but some netizens think that the regulation is too strict and lacks legal basis.

I don't think it makes sense. I think employees can throw out their company lunches if they don't think they're delicious.

Yes, it is understood,A company in Shanghai has introduced new rules to promote the social trend of "strict economy and no waste".If an employee casually throws away the free lunch provided by the company (including some of it) due to non-spoilage or other reasons, he or she will be warned once and dismissed three times

In this regard, an employee told reporters that there seems to be no such clause in the labor contract he signed with the company, and then some employees inquired about the labor contract law, and there seems to be no such content. "At that time, we were surprised to see this rule, could it be that if we poured food three times, we would be expelled? ”

The person in charge of the personnel department of a consulting service **** in Shanghai, which introduced the regulations, explained: Every working day, the company counts the number of people and delivers lunch, but every time it is found that many employees choose to eat the dishes, and a large part of the rest (including rice) is thrown away. There are many young female employees in the company, who are usually overly picky about their diet, and in order to effectively stop the waste, the company's leaders have made the above provisions.

Is it reasonable, a company in Shanghai stipulates that employees will be fired after pouring out lunch three times.

The person in charge of the personnel department of Shanghai Bingying Consulting Services, which introduced this provision, explained that every working day, the company counted the number of people and delivered lunch, but every time it was found that many employees chose to eat the dishes, and a large part of the rest (including rice) was thrown away. Some lunches are almost untouched, and employees collect them and leave them on the table for three or four days until they break down and throw them into the trash.

There are many young female employees in the company, who are usually too picky about their diet, in order to effectively stop the waste, the company's leaders have made the above regulations. The person in charge said.

Netizens generally maintain a dissupportive attitude towards this matter, they think that this is too coercive and one-size-fits-all, and such behavior is too inhumane.

Some netizens also said that they can choose to cook their own food, so that they can better choose their favorite flavors, and there will be no leftover meals. Everyone knows how big their stomach is and how much they can eat. Overall, there will be effective control in terms of leftover meals, and there will be no more waste.

There are also people who think that it may be a problem of ** business, and they should seek the opinions of employees to replace ** business. If the dishes of these first-class merchants are not fresh, then they should listen to the feedback of the employees, rather than just trying to be cheap, otherwise the waste and losses caused by the company are still their own.

The company's regulations are also to eliminate waste, many employees don't want to eat and pour it out, what a waste, you don't eat can not eat, you have to eat, I was born in the countryside, the most hated waste of people, who knows the plate of Chinese food, grains are hard, you throw away the rice is the farmer Uncle hard to plant, a person is so wasteful of food, treat the work can be imagined, save food, eliminate waste.

Let's not talk about the opinions of labor law experts, let's understand according to the real life situation, first of all, is the food suitable for everyone's taste? Is there a variety of food, suitable for everyone to make a choice.

If there are many types of food, it is chosen by yourself, and you can't eat it and throw it away, it is indeed a waste of food, if it is imposed, just a few dishes a day, you have to eat it if you don't eat it, which is a bit embarrassing.

I'm a Sichuanese, you tell me to eat sweets every day? It's good to eat it, but finish it? It's okay to do this every now and then, but it's definitely not okay every day, don't do unrighteous things under the guise of justice.

Personally, I don't think it's reasonable。Because whether the waste of food by employees is a serious violation of disciplineIt needs to be determined by the company's rules and regulations and is in line with common sense。And employees waste foodIt belongs to the category of personal morality and has little to do with labor disciplineIt is not legal for companies to fire employees on the grounds of "wasting food".

The company should take other ways to strengthen internal management, while:Problems cannot be dealt with in a simple, brutal manner

But for the company's approach, netizens have their own opinionsSome netizens think that this regulation is reasonableThis move is an effective means to solve the long-term unit meal waste, butSome netizens also think that the regulations are too strictThere is no legal basis, and there is no consensus about which is right and which is wrong.

If you think the company's regulations are unreasonable, don't enter, because the factory rules will be informed when you enter the factory.

Unreasonable, the law on the termination of labor contracts by enterprises has clear provisions, and one of the provisions is that the employee seriously violates the rules and regulations of the enterprise. Whether an employee's waste of food is a serious violation of discipline shall be determined by the rules and regulations of the enterprise and shall be in line with common sense. Employee waste of food belongs to the category of personal morality, which has little to do with labor discipline, and it is illegal for companies to fire employees on the grounds of wasting food.

Companies should take other ways to strengthen internal management, rather than dealing with problems in a simplistic and brutal way.

Although this is more harsh, the company's corporate culture, others have no way to care about him.

This rule is a bit tough. However, the starting point is to save food and avoid waste.

Reasonable,The company explicitly included waste in its rules and regulations, and employees violated the company's corporate rules and regulations. Life is getting better and better, which leads to a lot of waste. We should advocate the conservation of food and oppose the waste of food.

According to the relevant understanding, a certain company has issued a new regulation, if employees are wasted at will due to non-deterioration and other reasons, one warning, two warnings, and three direct dismissals.

Actually, like this case. The person in charge should inform the employee privately. Or rather, a company-wide meeting.

Explain the matter of waste, so that everyone can realize the shameful behavior of waste. Instead of using simple and brutal methods to solve problems. If we organize everyone to recognize this kind of problem.

So everyone wastes this phenomenon. can be solved dramatically. In this way, the problem of waste can be truly solved.

I think the company is doing the right thing. You should eat as much as you want, and you shouldn't waste food.

Saving food and CD-ROM action is a good behavior, but the company's regulations may be too strict, resulting in employee dissatisfaction, infighting in the company, etc., which may have an impact on the company's development.

I think this company has done a good job of preventing food waste, and it has been effective in discouraging employees' wasteful behavior.

Effective. Diligence and thrift are the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, and the waste of food is shameful, and the civil law has clear requirements for this, so the provisions are effective.

This provision is invalid in law. The company's intentions are good, in response to the state's policy of rejecting food waste, but for the purposes of this provision, it is legally invalid and employees cannot be fired for throwing out lunches.

Throwing out lunch three times and then dismissing is indeed a bit unreasonable. Throwing away lunch is a waste of food, and wasting food is within the realm of ethics and has no direct correlation with the ability to work. Many companies have the option to dismiss an employee if he or she seriously violates the company's rules or has a serious impact on the company's interests.

Throwing out the lunch obviously does not have a serious impact on the company's interests. However, if a company specifically includes the prohibition of throwing out lunch in its employee code, or has passed the review of the trade union and has formed a written rule, then employees do need to abide by it.

If it is found that the lunch is being dumped, it is a violation of the relevant rules and regulations, and the company has the right to impose penalties on the employee. Actually, the company's intentions are good. The company counted the number of people and prepared lunch for employees every day, but some employees ate one of the dishes and threw away all the rest.

There are also some female employees who have not touched the entire box of meals because they want to stay in shape. I didn't throw it away in time when I put it on the table, and it got moldy after two or three days, so I put it together and threw it away. As the leader of the company, it must be very distressing to see such waste.

Business management is also an art, and if you want employees to be convinced, you also need to use some skills and means. Such a rigid one-size-fits-all approach can easily cause resentment among employees. Not only does it fail to achieve the purpose of saving, but it may also cause employees to have different opinions.

For example, in another way, employees who need lunch at noon every day will automatically report meals, and set lunch according to the number of meals reported. Or just cancel the lunch and change it to a lunch subsidy, and employees can go out and buy whatever they want to eat.

After all, some employees still prefer to eat meals cooked at home, and may bring their own meals at noon every day, so that the meals ordered by the company will be more for them. Employees will be happier when it is directly converted into a lunch subsidy, and it will also be able to reduce administrative and personnel work.