How to write the resumes of applicants and participants in the bidding of the National Natural Scien

You can go to the login system page, and the operation is as follows.

landing pages; 2. After logging in to the system, we can directly click "Application and Acceptance" to directly start the application project

Of course, we can also click on "scientific research resume" after logging in to the system to form a scientific research resume.

4. After clicking on "Research Resume", the following will appear:

If your basic information has already been filled in, your CV will automatically appear.

Interface: If you find that your information is incomplete, such as your personal work history.

or the projects that you have presided over or participated in in the past five years, then you need to supplement which one you lack!

If you find that the work outside of the masterpieces and treatises is insufficient or incomplete, you need to complete the shed by clicking on the plus sign in the image below.

5. For the way to add the results on behalf of Zheng Xiaozuo, you can refer to:

National Natural ** Participant in the Resume Check.

In 2022, the National Natural Science ** project will continue to fully implement paperless applications. All types of projects "Humei National Natural Science ** Application Form" (hereinafter referred to as the application form) shall be written in the ** way. The applicant should submit the electronic application verification form, and upload the relevant certification letters, recommendation letters and other materials that need special instructions in electronic scanned copies.

The relying unit only needs to confirm the electronic application form and attachment materials, and does not need to submit paper application materials; After the project is approved, the paper signature and seal page of the application form should be bound at the end of the "Funded Project Plan" and submitted together. The signature and seal information must be consistent with the electronic application.

The biographical information of the main participants is collected in the same way as the applicants. The applicant shall invite the main participant** to fill in the resume through the information system, and upload the pdf version of the personal resume file of the main participant automatically generated by the information system. Those who do not upload the biographies of the main participants as required will not be able to submit the project application.

Both the applicant and the main participant shall use their unique identity documents to apply for the project, and if they have used other identity documents as the applicant or participant to obtain project funding, they shall indicate in the application form. The applicant should ensure that the mailbox provided is unblocked and effective, so that after the project review is completed, the applicant can receive the notice of approval or non-funding of the applied project in a timely manner, as well as the relevant information of the expert review opinions, otherwise the legal consequences arising therefrom shall be borne by the applicant.

Naturally** participants' resumes need to upload representative works.

First of all, it should be noted that the title and corresponding caption in blue font in the template cannot be deleted or changed. First of all, it should be noted that the title and corresponding caption in blue font in the template cannot be deleted or changed. The third point to note is that the educational experience column needs to be sorted in "reverse chronological order", that is, it needs to be written from the beginning of the high education to the undergraduate

The fourth point is about scientific research and academic work experience, which should be noted that it is also sorted in "reverse chronological order". Next, it should be noted that the situation of presiding over or participating in scientific research projects (topics) also needs to be sorted in "reverse chronological order". Many people are sorting out because of the large number of projects, so we need to sort it out here.

Finally, we should pay attention to the representative research results and academic awards, which have changed a lot this year, and we need to pay close attention to them. This kind of information is divided into two parts in the template, one is representative treatises (including ** and monographs, within 5 items in total), and the other is representative research results and academic awards outside the monographs (within 10 items in total). In addition to classification, you also need to pay attention to the number of restrictions for each item!

In the column of representative research achievements and academic awards, the writing format of various achievements is listed in the template, and I hope you can fill in it according to the format, which must meet the template specifications.

Applicant Matters Applicants should be aware of the following[3]::

1.Applicants should carefully read the "Regulations", "Guidelines", relevant types of projects and funding management measures, and write the "National Natural Science ** Project Application Form" (hereinafter referred to as the application form) according to the requirements of the writing outline.

1) The types of projects that use offline application writing include: general projects, key projects, youth science projects, and regional science projects. The specific requirements are as follows:

After January 1, 2012, the applicant shall log in to the 2012 version of the application form of the scientific ** network information hosiery system (hereinafter referred to as the ISIS system)**, and shall not use the previous version of the application. After the applicant completes the writing of the application, the electronic version of the application and the signed original paper application (including attachments) shall be submitted to the supporting unit. Applicants should ensure that the content of the paper application is consistent with the electronic version.

2) The types of projects that adopt the method of writing an application include: major projects, major research projects, national basic science talent training projects, youth science projects, outstanding young scientists, national science projects for distinguished young scholars, innovative research group projects, overseas and Hong Kong and Macao scholars cooperative research projects, joint projects, special projects for basic research of scientific instruments, popular science projects, special projects for key academic journals, and mathematics Tianyuan Youth projects, major international (regional) cooperative research projects, international (regional) cooperative research and exchange projects, etc. The specific requirements are as follows:

Apply for a good returnee to obtain the user name and password from the supporting unit, log in to the ISIS system, accurately select the corresponding application item type (including subclass description and annotation description), write the application form in accordance with the relevant requirements and prompts, and electronically attach the application materials. Among them, after the applicant of a major international (regional) cooperative research project completes the ** writing of the Chinese application in accordance with the above requirements, he should also write the ** "English Application for Major International (Regional) Cooperative Research Projects" in the ISIS system, and the English application together with the agreement between the two parties is used as an attachment to the application for Zhongzheng buried documents.

After the applicant completes the writing of the application, **submit the electronic application and its electronic attachments,** and print the final PDF version of the application, and submit the signed original paper application to the supporting unit, and there is no need to submit paper attachments (except for the original paper materials such as relevant certification letters and recommendation letters).

Applicants should ensure that the content of the paper application is consistent with the electronic version.

Many people have already started to write the 2013 National Natural Science ** application, and the most difficult problem to grasp is the 'innovation point' in the application.

Generally speaking, the national natural science encourages innovation and exploration, which is the soul of the national natural science, so if the application is written conservatively and has no new ideas, it is very likely to be rejected. Summing up my experience of writing applications and reviewing national natural ** for more than ten years, the projects that have not been funded are basically applications without too many new ideas.

However, there is another situation where after the application is handed in, the response is 'bragging', and the content to be studied in the application is untenable, or it is impossible to achieve it at all.

And there are two situations in the book that is considered to be 'bragging'.,One is indeed 'bragging'.,In order to get the project, write an unfounded 'innovation point'.。 There is another situation where your innovation point may be too far ahead of the reviewer's understanding and what they consider impossible to complete.

It's sometimes hard to determine the degree of innovation!

I thought about this again for a walk the night before. I thought at the time, if I were a judge, and I was the standard, I would see that the people walking in front of me were 'advanced', and I saw that the people behind me were 'backward'. Generally speaking, I would agree to fund the 'advanced' and not the 'backward'.

And the more people in front, the higher the judging score, and it is better to be far in front of me and hazy for me to see better.

However, if the person walking ahead of me is too advanced and out of my sight, I can't be sure if this person exists. At this point, it is necessary to make a judgment on the possibility. In the actual review process, there is a very high probability that this situation will be rejected.

Therefore, when writing an application, we must pay attention to the 'degree' of the proposal of the innovation point, especially what is the basis for the proposal of the innovation point. If we deduce step by step based on the progress or data that has been obtained, and the key problems (innovations) that will be solved are generated, it will feel reasonable and reasonable, and there is a high possibility of getting consent. If it is groundless, it often feels unreasonable and is rejected.

In fact, in the actual review,The rejected book is not necessarily bad.,Some of the rejected good books may be the reason why the reviewer understands it.。

The book with a very good innovation point,It may not be certain.,So a few days ago, there was a blog post about this problem.。

The easiest project is often the book where the applicant has already had some research data with signs of 'innovation points', although this 'innovation point' has exceeded the reviewer's 'line of sight', but these obtained research data make the reviewer 'convincingly' give the conclusion of 'priority funding'.

Of course, this does not include abnormal factors in the evaluation of ** applications.

The idea that the earth revolves around the sun is a 'common sense' that has no new meaning for people today, but for people in Copernicus' time, they could not understand it, and it was considered a 'heresy' and Copernicus was not understood by everyone.