Is it feasible for environmental experts to recommend that rural areas stop using firewood and use n

I think it's feasible because firewood is still used in many rural areas, which causes serious pollution, and natural gas is very environmentally friendly.

Yes, living with firewood carries a lot of risks, while living with natural gas is safer, more environmentally friendly, and less costly.

I think it is feasible because the use of natural gas will reduce the waste of resources and the generation of pollution, which is very good for the environment.

Is it feasible for environmental experts to propose that the use of earthen stoves in rural areas be stopped and firewood replaced with natural gas? It's doable. Not only should the burning of straw be banned, but also the burning of coal in rural areas.

State and local** have spent a lot of money to promote the dual generation of coal-to-gas and coal-to-electricity. This work can, firstly, reduce air pollution caused by coal burning, and secondly, reduce the burden on farmers. It's good for the country and the people.

1. Regardless of the advice of environmental experts, it is feasible to switch from firewood to natural gas in rural areas in the south where the temperature is high and there is no need for heating in winter. In addition, even before environmental experts did not advise it, the South stopped using firewood and used natural gas for cooking. We all know that natural gas is a clean energy source, which is simple and convenient to use and does not pollute the environment.

In the South, as long as gas companies have laid gas pipelines and piped natural gas through pipelines, they can stop using firewood and switch to natural gas. While using natural gas increases the burden on farmers, farmers also love to use natural gas because it saves labor!

2. However, in areas that need heating in winter, it is impossible and impractical to switch from firewood to natural gas. Especially in the rural areas of northeastern and northwest China, large stoves carry large fire kangs. Burning wood on a large stove can heat the kang while cooking rice.

In the cold and low temperature of about minus 30 degrees, the big kang also has a large stove pit that burns the kang alone, no matter how cold it is outside, if you burn one or two bundles of corn stalks in the big stove of the big kang kang, the kang will be heated immediately, and the temperature in the room will rise immediately. No matter how cold it is outside, no matter how cold it is outside, the farmer's friends will live in a warm room and sleep on the ondol!

3. There is another key issue in the use of natural gas in rural areas in the north, that is, safety. Because natural gas must be transported through pipelines, in rural northern areas where temperatures are around minus 30 degrees, gas pipelines can often freeze and burst. If the gas pipeline freezes, ruptures, and gas leaks, a serious accident will occur.

Once an accident occurs, the consequences will be severe and unimaginable. Therefore, from an economic and security point of view, gas is not suitable for the rural areas of northern China!

Personally, I think this will work, because with the continuous development of society and people's awareness of environmental protection, it is feasible to change firewood to natural gas.

I think that's good. If it is enforced, there is a high probability that a contradiction will arise. If it's suggestive, there's a good chance that farmers won't do it.

I don't think it's going to work. Because the countryside uses earthen stoves for heating, and this is also in line with the living habits of farmers.

In fact, this method works, if it can really be implemented, I believe that there are many farmers who are very willing, after all, this is really very convenient, and it can also solve many of our things. But if you really want to implement it, there are many difficulties, and you need to communicate everything before you can implement it, otherwise there will be a lot of trouble. For example, we must first ensure that the first is sufficient, so that we can install natural gas in everyone's home, otherwise what if it is not available one day?

After all, the countryside is not as convenient as the city, and it is not possible to find someone to repair it anytime and anywhere. <>

And it also depends on the environment of each place, for example, the winter in the north is very, very cold, everyone needs warmth, if all the one-size-fits-all are replaced with natural gas, then there are some places that will definitely not be on it. And the heating is definitely impossible to stop, otherwise everyone will really freeze to death, we all know that the winter in the north is really life-threatening, dozens of degrees below zero at every turn, if there is no warm environment, then we really can't bear it, there is no way to be able to bear it, this problem must be solved, otherwise it will not be able to implement. <>

In fact, the installation of natural gas in rural areas is an improvement for the environment of rural people, and it is also beneficial to them. After all, cooking with firewood or cooking with a gas stove is also more dangerous, and it is not clean and environmentally friendly. If we could use natural gas, the kitchen would be clean every day, without smoke and fire.

However, the cost of natural gas is also quite high, but our gas also needs money, and if it can make it especially convenient for everyone, I believe everyone is still willing to use this money. But we must ensure that the dosage is sufficient, and it is impossible to break it in winter, and once it is broken, everyone will freeze to death at home. <>

I don't think it's going to work, it's inconvenient to use gas in the countryside.

I don't think it's going to work, because a lot of farmers are under a lot of financial pressure right now, and it won't work if they are allowed to use natural gas.

This plan is very difficult to work, because the rural areas of our country are very large, and there are very many farmers, and it takes a lot of work to implement this idea, so it is very difficult to work.

I think such an approach is feasible; This will also be beneficial for rural people, for example, if you want to burn firewood, it will pollute the environment, and the state in order to ensure the environmental protection of rural areas, it is now not allowed, I think it will be more convenient to use natural gas, and it is relatively clean, but it may cause unnecessary costs to the countryside due to greater economic pressure.

I don't think it's feasible because the rural areas are vast and sparsely populated, and it costs a lot to install gas. The advantage is that it is convenient for farmers, but some farmers may not be willing to use it.

For better fresh air, for better farmers' physical and mental health ......However, authoritative experts also take into account the wage cost of farmers' land contracting, and the use of firewood waste does not cost money, which can save some expenses. Otherwise, coal, electricity, water, everything has to cost money, and it is better to adapt measures to local conditions and time conditions. Authoritative experts suggest that the use of firewood stoves for cooking in villages is not closely related to the specific idealism of the vast majority of rural life.

Authoritative experts expect that farmers' daily life will be improved, with the use of new stoves, clean and clean cooking, which is both clean and hygienic and environmentally friendly, and reduces the damage to the natural environment caused by firewood.

There is nothing wrong with this idea, but the cost of renovation and long-term use of natural materials is not affordable for many farmers, and it is difficult to implement the technical and manpower maintenance of public facilities, and the lifestyle of farmers who have been burning wood for heating and cooking for decades cannot be changed. Therefore, it is unrealistic for all villages to strictly prohibit firewood for cooking, and it is possible to carry out some correct guidance and demonstration in some areas where the urbanization process is relatively fast and the standards are relatively good, so as to encourage and correctly guide farmers to adopt new energy technologies for production and life. I look forward to the doctors who make suggestions to go to the wide countryside to understand the specific situation of rural farmers in China, and make suggestions according to the time and conditions.

Let's not forget that China is still in the initial stage of socialist society, that poverty alleviation has just been successful, that many peasants have just dealt with the problem of food and clothing, and that there is still a long way to go for our peasants to be well-off. Everyone believes that China's rural farmers will get better and better every year! When the smog appeared, the people in the village did not know.

If there is damage, it should be treated, and it should be applied to all farmers, and it is a good thing that our country will control air pollution and reduce the reduction of harmful substances as much as possible.

For thousands of years, farmers have lived in mountainous areas and collected firewood on the spot, but there was no haze in the weather, and even if there was some smoke, the mountains and forests absorbed it. The smog weather is attributed to the burning of firewood and firewood stoves in the countryside, but the peasants cannot punish this crime. It is unrealistic to curb the burning of firewood stoves, China is also a big agricultural country, firewood stoves are of course a part of the ripples, irreplaceable, farmers are living a good life in the city, there is no doubt that farmers will increase economic pressure.

It would certainly be a good thing if the peasants were like doctors, with a salary and a retirement pension. I wish there was one day.

I think it's very appropriate, because now everyone is more environmentally conscious, and the use of natural gas is more environmentally friendly.

I don't think it's particularly suitable, because natural gas is not suitable in rural areas, and natural gas can also lead to environmental damage in rural areas.

This practice is very appropriate, after all, there is still a certain danger in cooking with firewood, which can make them develop a particularly good habit.

In our hometown, everyone now generally uses induction cookers, and there are a few that use gas and natural gas, and there are fewer and fewer wood-burning stoves.

1. Why are there fewer and fewer wood-burning stoves?

1. Use induction cooker to be cleaner and more hygienic

Burn the firewood stove, use the fire before the fire, and wait for the fire to burn before you can cook and stir-fry, if the firewood is very damp or the fire technology is not good, the whole yard will be smoky. Whenever the fire is lit to cook, there will always be a layer of smoke floating in the house, and those who are not used to it often choke on tears, and dust everywhere is inevitable, and the use of induction cooker is much cleaner and more hygienic.

2. It is more convenient and trouble-free to use an induction cooker

Induction cooker with use, especially convenient and trouble-free, although the firewood stove is more cost-effective, but now everyone's living standards have generally improved, do not value this money, and even feel that burning firewood is a shameful thing.

2. Why is natural gas becoming more and more popular?

The benefits of loading natural gas are obvious, one is hygiene, no longer smoke and ashes everywhere; Second, it is convenient, unlike firewood, gas, etc., which need to be replaced frequently, and natural gas is basically not managed, which saves a lot of trouble; Third, it is more cost-effective than electricity.

3. After the installation of natural gas, will the burning of firewood stoves be banned in rural areas?

In recent years, many voices have called for a ban on firewood stoves, and there are many reasons given, one of which is that firewood stoves in rural areas will damage the environment. In the past, every household in the countryside has been burning firewood for cooking, but at that time the sky was very blue, the water was very clear, and there was no haze, which was indeed reasonable.

However, having said that, in fact, most people in the countryside now choose to burn natural gas and electricity, and there are not many people who really insist on burning firewood for cooking, so it doesn't matter much whether it is forbidden or not, because in more than ten years, after those who insist on cooking on the firewood stove are old, few people will use the firewood stove. What do you think?

Because firewood burning has a relatively small impact on air pollution, and many people do not burn firewood anymore after using natural gas, there is no ban on firewood burning.

It is impossible to prohibit it, everyone in the countryside will burn firewood. It's convenient, fast, and economical, and the firewood rice is very fragrant, and the dishes are delicious.

Because the use of natural gas requires a certain amount of expenses, it cannot be implemented in rural areas, and many farmers are unwilling to spend money, so most of them still burn firewood.

Not feasible. Although many rural areas have begun to use natural gas, natural gas is too expensive for farmers to afford.