What does it mean that the law does not shape and what it used to be

1. The concept of the principle that the law does not apply retroactively.

The retroactivity of a law, i.e., the retroactive effect of a law, refers to the question of whether the law is applicable after its promulgation to the acts and time before it came into force. If it is applicable, the law is retroactive, and if it is not applicable, the law is not retroactive. The principle of non-retroactivity of law, which means that no rule of law may apply to acts prior to its entry into force, is a legal principle that is universally recognized by all legal systems of the world, like the principle of certainty.

2. The legal basis of the principle of non-retroactivity.

1. The promulgation of the law comes into effect. In order for a law to be binding as a law, it must apply to the person it regulates, and such application must be subject to the promulgation of the law so that it can be known to the regulated.

2. The theory of vested rights. If a law deprives or impairs acquired rights acquired under existing law, or creates new obligations, imposes new liabilities, or disqualifies persons or persons from acting in relation to past transactions or conduct, the law is "retroactive" and therefore invalid.

3. Trust and interest protection. As long as any member of society acts in accordance with the law, he or she has the right to expect and rely on the positive effects of the law, and this trust is justified and should not be lost by a change in the law, and the new law cannot deprive the members of the society of the legitimate trust that arises from the original law.

3. Exceptions to the principle of non-retroactivity with the law.

1. The new law shall apply to the litigation procedure.

2. Judicial interpretations can be retroactive.

4. The application of the principle that the law does not apply retroactively.

1. Article 84 of the Legislation Law. Laws, administrative regulations, local regulations, autonomous regulations, and special regulations and rules do not apply retroactively.

2. Article 12 of the Criminal Law. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, if the laws of the People's Republic of China and before the implementation of this Law are not considered to be crimes, the laws of the time shall apply; If the law at the time considers it to be a crime,..

3. Article 196 of the Opinions of the People's Republic of China. For cases accepted after January 1, 1987, if the civil act occurred before 1987, the laws and policies at the time of the civil act shall apply.

4. Article 3 of the Notice of the Negotiable Instruments Law and the Guarantee Law. The relevant provisions at the time of occurrence shall apply to the acts of negotiable instruments and guarantees before the implementation of the two laws.

5. Article 1 of the Interpretation of the Contract Law (I). Where a dispute arises in a contract established after the implementation of the Contract Law and is brought to the people's court, the provisions of the Contract Law shall apply; Where a dispute arises from a contract established before the implementation of the Contract Law and is brought to the people's court, the provisions of the law at that time shall apply, except as otherwise provided in this interpretation.

6. Article 133 of the Interpretation of the Security Law. Where a guarantee occurs before the implementation of the Guarantee Law, the laws, regulations and relevant judicial interpretations at the time of the occurrence of the guarantee act shall apply.

7. Article 1 of the Interpretation (I) of the Company Law. After the implementation of the Company Law, if the civil acts or events of the civil cases that have not yet been concluded by the people's courts and are newly accepted by the people's courts occurred before the implementation of the Company Law, the laws, regulations and judicial interpretations at that time shall apply.

Newly enacted laws generally do not have effect on matters before they were enacted, but only on matters after they were enacted. Do not pursue what has already passed.

The law does not apply retroactively.

The law in force today cannot be used as a basis for imposing penalties for acts that occur.

1. There are no contradictions in all of them, please see the reply above regarding the principle of non-retroactivity of the law.

The principle of the old substantive law and the new procedural law refers to: if the substantive tax law concerning the creation, change and loss of tax rights and obligations changes after the occurrence of a taxable act or fact, unless otherwise provided by law, the provisions of the tax law at the time of its occurrence shall be applied to the act or fact, that is, the principle of non-retroactivity of the law shall be followed; However, when the tax authorities apply the tax collection procedures or perform the tax debts, the new law shall apply to the tax collection and management procedures, regardless of the period when the tax claims and debts are incurred.

For example, before January 1, 08, the corporate income tax rate was 33%, and the deadline for declaration and payment was 4 months; After January 1, 08, the income tax rate is 25%, and the deadline for declaration and payment is changed from 4 months to 5 months. The income tax rate is 33% and the filing period is 5 months. This is because the tax rate is the content of the substantive law, while the tax period is the content of the procedural law.

There are indeed contradictions.

The principle that the law does not shape the past is that ex post facto law cannot pursue ex ante acts, so the new procedure does not conform to the principle that ex post facto law does not pursue ex ante acts.

Generally speaking, the law does not shape the past, and will add a sentence that does not prohibit the retroactivity of the law in favor of the defendant. But still not the principle of entities from the old and procedures from the new. This is because the reinstatement of the proceedings may be more disadvantageous to the accused. So.

The principle of the old substance and the new procedure is not consistent with the principle of non-plastic law and the past.

It's just that in general, ex post facto law is more standardized and generally favors the defendant, but this is not absolute, and it cannot be generalized through one or two examples.

Bear in mind that the new law is not necessarily better than the old law. The new law is not necessarily lighter than the old one.

It can be solved with just one lighter, I just tried it! First cut all the edges of the plastic, and then use a lighter to bake one side of the corner, while it is hot, it is easy to tear the side of the corner that has been roasted over the plastic film, just like that, it is very easy to tear it! But if the paper is very thin, be careful!

Parallel to the table or floor, quickly pull out the paper. The key is speed. Then the direction of the power remains horizontal.

Try it by smearing some water on the place where the tape is attached.

Plastic modification, that is, general plastics can not meet the needs of customers, and some technical means need to be used to improve performance.

No. Version 2 is relatively balanced because of the large control of DM, but the school setting is very different from what you know... For example, a spider web is classified as a plastic energy, and a debilitating ray is classified as an enchantment rather than a necromancy. And it also uses concepts such as spell summoning (note that this can be said to be a school), plastic energy invocation (this can also be said to be a school), and advanced prophecy, rather than the eight schools of spells, change, protection, plasticity, prophecy, confusion, necromancy, and illusion that you know.

The 3rd version of the school is those eight two words, but it is completely unbalanced, and the strongest school is spells, followed by change, and then then protection. Necromancy is the weakest.

4 versions of Spells·· Maybe it's different from what you know, so let's not talk about it.

Version 5 is also those eight - spells, changes, protection, plasticity, prophecy, confusion, necromancy, illusions, and it's hard to say whether they are strong or weak. A strong school spell does not necessarily mean that a school mage is strong, for example, the change school spell is very strong, but the class ability given by the change master is weak. The prophetic spell is not strong, but the prophet has a strong professional ability.

It is not a law, only those promulgated by the National People's Congress and the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress are laws, or those promulgated with the authorization of the National People's Congress are laws.

The restriction order is an administrative regulation issued by ***, and the effect of administrative regulations is lower than that of law.

Doll is a plush toy, doll may be the name of Guangdong, such as Foshan's Shiwan doll Doll is also plasticity and fluidity under pressure, can be molded into a certain shape, and keep the shape unchanged under certain conditions.