On a question about the dialectics of nature, 100 200 words will do, urgent!

1 This is a paradigm difference.

2 The question of who revolves around whom, who moves and who does not move, the earth and the sun, depends on different astronomical theoretical frameworks, i.e., different paradigms (Kuhn's concept).The difference between Tycho and Kepler is a concrete example of the transition from the geocentric paradigm to the heliocentric paradigm.

3 Because of the paradigm differences, it is not possible to simply determine whether a scientific assertion is true or false, and it cannot simply be said (for example) that Tycho was wrong and Kepler was right.

I want to add: you this"Recorded in the history of science"It's too much like a fairy tale. Suggested Reading:

Kovalé, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, translated by Wu Botao and Zhang Hua, Peking University Press, 2003In particular, chapters II and III of it.

This question is a result of different points of view arising from the difference in the points of reference between the two. Hence the theory of "geocentrism" and "heliocentrism".

Each person has a different reference! This is the most basic common sense of physics!

If only the Earth and the Sun, and the ratio of their masses is not known.

Well, it is very possible that the sun is circling the earth or the earth is circling the sun.

It was naturally impossible to know the mass ratio and the gravitational formula in Kapler's time, but Kepler made such a view when he found that the motion of other planets appeared regular only if the Earth was assumed to revolve around the Sun.

Materialist Dialectics:

The internal causes of the occurrence of a thing play a leading role, and it must arise under certain external factors.

The two sides of the contradiction are independent of each other and interact with each other.

The two sides of the contradiction are interdependent and indispensable.

Thus, Tycho and Kepler watched the sunrise at the same time, and Tycho came to the conclusion that "the earth does not move, and the sun moves around the earth"; Kepler, on the other hand, came up with "the sun does not move, the earth moves around the sun". It is also the embodiment of the dialectic of existential materialism.

They have different management points, one is heliocentr, and the other is geocentric.

The basic theoretical viewpoints of the dialectics of nature are as follows:

There are three basic points of dialectics: the unity of opposites.

1. The negation of mutual change and negation of quality. These three laws of dialectics are philosophically universal to the limit.

Dialectics: 3 points of view Unity of opposites.

It is also known as the unity of opposites and the law of struggle. It reveals the characteristics of objective existence (nature, human society, human thinking, etc.), all of which contain inherent contradictions, and are all the unity of contradictions. The internal contradictions of things are the source and driving force of the development and change of things, and promote the development of things.

Mass interchange. The law of mutual change of quality reveals the characteristics of the development process and state of things caused by contradictions, and the form of development and change.

Negation.

It reveals the characteristics of the process of contradictory movement, and tells people that contradictory movement is the manifestation of vitality, which is characterized by self-denial and transformation into opposites. Thus the law of negation of negation constitutes the essence of dialectical movement. In the law of affirmation and negation, the focus is on the law of negation of negation.

The basic viewpoint of materialist dialectics The viewpoint of materialist dialectics: the concept of development, the concept of connection, the concept of contradiction, and the concept of dialectical negation (which is both a link of connection and a link of development).

Materialist dialectics advocates looking at problems from the viewpoint of connection, development, and comprehensiveness. It requires people to start from the interconnection and interaction between things when observing and analyzing problems, and not just see isolated foods; It is necessary to examine the current state of things in relation to its past and future.

It is necessary not only to see the movement of the position of things and the increase or decrease of the quantity, but also to see the change and development of the fundamental nature of things; When analyzing the causes of the development of things, we should focus on grasping the internal contradictions (internal causes) of the development of things, and not ignore the external contradictions (external causes) of the development of things.

How can it be the same as my exam questions hahaha.

1.What is Dialectics of Nature?

The dialectics of nature is the fundamental viewpoint and way of thinking of people understanding and transforming nature, and it is a science about the general laws of nature and the development of science and technology, as well as the general methods of understanding and transforming nature.

2.How to understand the nature and status of the dialectic of nature?

Nature: "One Center" - The Nature of the Dialectic of Nature - Marxist Philosophy. The dialectics of nature is the natural dialectic of Marxist philosophy and a sub-discipline of Marxist philosophy.

Status: "Two combinations" - the status of the dialectic of nature - the intermediate link between Marxist philosophy and science and technology. The dialectics of nature is different from the general principles of Marxism and from various sciences and technologies, but it is also the link and bridge between the two.

Just as historical materialism is an intermediate link between Marxist philosophy and various social sciences.