-
No, Chao Cuo is just a scapegoat, even without him, Emperor Jing of the Han Dynasty still wants to solve the problem of the vassal state, or the same to cut the vassal domain, and the vassal kings will definitely not sit still.
-
A large part of the rebellion of the Seven Kingdoms was caused by the situation at that time, and it was impossible to change the whole situation because one person did not die.
-
I don't think so, even if Chao Cuo doesn't die, there is still no other way to solve the Rebellion of the Seven Kingdoms, and Chao Cuo is what Emperor Jing of Han used to carry the black cauldron.
-
No, it is difficult for one person to decide the entire overall situation at that time, and there may be some influence, but it is definitely the entire masses of the people who decide the historical situation.
-
I don't think it's going to solve it. Chao Cuo's strategy was wrong and out of place, but in comparison, Emperor Wu's Tui En Decree was much more clever.
-
The wheel of history will not change because of one person, even if Chao Cuo does not die, it will not change the ending, and it may only be delayed at most.
-
There should be no way to solve it, Liu Qi just listened to Chao Cuo's suggestion to cut the feudal domain, and this method was too urgent and there was no buffer room, which led to the direct outbreak of the Seven Kingdoms Rebellion.
-
It has nothing to do with Huang Cuo, the most important thing that Emperor Jing of Han wants to achieve is to cut down the domain, and there is no other way to solve the rebellion of the Seven Kingdoms.
-
I don't think it's possible, even if he doesn't die, the Qi country will still be in chaos. Even if he didn't die, maybe his method was to alleviate the war.
-
How do you say this? In fact, he did not die in vain, because his words were only a political need. Whether he does it or not, the Six Nations will return anyway. It was only a matter of time, but what he did accelerated the expansion of the ambitions of the Six Nations.
-
Otherwise. Politicians do not die in vain. The princes rebelled with the slogan of "punishing the wrong and clearing the monarch's side", and Emperor Xiaojing, as the king of a country, must be ready for a crusade.
In ancient wars, the division was famous, and it was purely a political necessity to kill Chao Wrong, so that the princes had no excuse to raise troops, so they could only let Mr. Chao make a sacrifice. With this step, to counter the rebellion is to rejuvenate the king and defeat the rebellion.
-
Chao Cuo is innocent, as a political victim, Chao Cuo can die worthless, of course, the current situation, the power of the local princes has been greater than **, Chao Cuo rashly entered the words to cut the domain, and the eyebrows and mustaches were grabbed, it is strange not to cause the local princes to resist, the local princes did not dare to target the emperor, they could only use this to say things for the dead ghost, once they rebelled, there was a way back!
-
Because Emperor Han Jing needed an excuse, he didn't die in vain, and without him, Emperor Han Jing couldn't get rid of his henchmen so easily.
-
After Emperor Han Jing beheaded Chao Wrong, the Six Kingdoms rebelled before he found out that he had been fooled, in fact, Emperor Han Jing did not cut Chao Wrong, the Six Kingdoms would rebel, Chao Cuo was killed by Emperor Han Jing, this is just Chao Cuo is responsible for the mistakes he made.
-
It was purely a political need, so that the princes had no excuse to raise troops, so they could only let Mr. Chao make a sacrifice. With this step, and then countering the rebellion, without him, Emperor Jing of Han could not get rid of his henchmen so easily.
-
The rebellion of the Seven Kings originated from the policy of cutting feudal domains, and their power and interests were infringed, so they naturally would not give up, so they united to rebel under the banner of the Qing monarch's side punishment.
-
At that time, someone had already put forward the idea of Tuen. This was the right thing to do, but Chao mistakenly refused and continued to promote the reduction of the feudal domain.
So he is responsible for this mistake.
-
In this way, there was no reason for the rebellion of the Seven Nations.
-
The reason why King Wu and other seven kings rebelled was because of the cutting of the domain, of course, their reason was that the Qing monarch was on the side of "punishing Chao wrong, and the Qing monarch was on the side". At this time, Emperor Jing of Han had already killed Chao Cuo, so it was wrong for them to attack. So no matter what the situation is, Chao Cuo is bound to die, and now use Chao Cuo's death to let those people see clearly the truth that the Seven Kings sent troops is not to the so-called Qing Jun's side, but to rebel.
And although this reduction of the feudal domain was proposed by Chao Cuo, it was implemented by Emperor Jing of the Han Dynasty, but it was also what Emperor Jing of the Han Dynasty wanted to do, even if there was no mistake from Chao, there were other people who proposed it. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Seven Kingdoms and Chao Cuo, and it is Emperor Jing of Han who has contradictions with them.
-
After the outbreak of the Seven Kingdoms Rebellion, Emperor Jing heard the news and discussed with Zhaocuo about sending troops. Zhao Chao suggested that the emperor of the Han Dynasty should stay alone in the capital. Some people say that this is the reason why Zhao Chao died. Zhao Chao's failure to lead the army to put the emperor in danger showed that he was plotting against the emperor.
-
Emperor Jing of the Han Dynasty just wanted to try it, but Chao Cuo still had some faults after all, which was also a punishment for him.
-
Chao Cuo should be used to carry this black cauldron, because only he can win the hearts of the people and win the trust of Emperor Jing of the Han Dynasty.
-
The pot of the rebellion of the Seven Kingdoms of the Western Han Dynasty should not be carried by Chao Cuo, because at that time, it was Emperor Jing of the Han Dynasty who wanted to cut the domain, and Chao Cuo was just a scapegoat.
-
It should not be blamed on Chao Mistake, because the most fundamental reason is that the power of the princes and kings is too great.
Let's put Jia Yi.
A macroscopic comparison with the wrong political essays shows a significant difference between the two. Chao Wrong's Political Essay is the prose of a veritable politician and political writer; Jia Yi's political essays are the prose of a typical political commentator with the temperament of a literati. Although Jia Yi's literary talent is better than Chao Cuo's, the temperament of a politician is far inferior to Chao Cuo, and he is only a political commentator at best. >>>More
Because it was made by mistake"Cutting the domain"led to a rebellion, so Emperor Jing of the Han Dynasty made a mistake in order to quell the rebellion.
From the point of view of right and wrong, he died a sad death. >>>More
He was an unlucky man, a cannon fodder in history, with no talent and ambitions, appearing in a season where he had to die....
It cannot be reduced, and the amount remains the same.