Sony W220 Fujifilm J250 Fujifilm J35 Which one should I choose?

Let me tell you, Sony W220 color is not distorted, the style is good-looking, and there are many functions. However, its biggest failure is that it claims to be 12 million pixels, but its imaging function is very poor... The imaging function is related to the lens, pixels and some other things, in short, you put ** into the computer, it is very unclear, and the edges and lines of the object are very blurry.

Then put the original size of **, whether it is 12m 8m or 5m 3m, it is not clear. So what's the point of me taking those 12 million pixels!!

Fuji heard that there is an S1500, which is an imitation of the appearance of a SLR, others have recommended it to me, I checked it on the Internet, and there are still people who have high requirements for light in this camera, so I didn't buy it, but I was attracted by the W220. So, you can check the Fujifilm S1500 price, which seems to be about the same as the W220. Also, if you're looking for high quality, you can buy a Canon 2000-2200 camera.

In fact, buying a W220, plus an original battery, is more than 2000. I regret it now. On the contrary, Fujifilm and Canon's batteries and other accessories are much cheaper.

And Sony's after-sales service is really poor, very poor. Even within the warranty period, he will most likely give you an identification that it is caused by man-made, and the maintenance fee is very high, and the cost of repairing it twice can buy a good camera.

It's not fair for you to compare 220 to Fuji J250... **Very bad.

At the price of 1400, buy Fujifilm F60 invincible, and if you can have super CCD at this price, you can see F60, and you can see F75 with a little more

You directly exclude W220, J250 is similar to 35, but the difference in appearance color, 250 has no red, 35 has red.

I was originally going to buy the w220, and as soon as I turned it on, I was too late. Later, I wanted to buy 250 or 35, but these two belong to the low-end machine, and then I didn't buy it, and then I bought F75, Super CCD, 10x zoom, because I thought I wouldn't change the camera for two years (as long as the camera is not broken), so buy F75 It's really good, 250 and 35 are good-looking, and the red of 35 is good. You remember,35This machine plus 4G card,Two batteries, one original,One domestic,No more than 1100,250 I forgot,These are what I learned when I went to buy a camera in the afternoon,

Used Sony W150, 180Fujifilm F30, 31, 50 (I can't remember if it was 50 or 60), and J27

It feels like the strengthened version of the W180 should be the W290, and the 220 is too mediocre and has no obvious advantages.

The J250 is also just an alternative to the F-Series**.

In fact, you can take a look at the F75 or 2000 of parallel goods. Two days ago, my classmate bought a F75 with a dual electric belt card in Hangzhou, a total of about 1500. It's worth it.

Parallel imports are more suitable, a camera is used several times a year, and I don't want to use the phone every day, so it's not bad at all. Moreover, there is no guarantee for man-made injuries of licensed goods. It's not as good as parallel imports, and parallel goods will be insured in the store.

So, I recommend the F75In addition, I personally recommend the Panasonic FX180, and I like it more.

Sony W220 parameters are more general,Good shape,Full metal shell,I just don't like that little shutter,I'm a boy,For me220The shutter is too light and too small,I haven't pressed the focus carelessly,The result is paste,So I put it down after trying it out in the store for a while,Not recommended。

J250 is recommended by a **store later,CCD is a little bigger than 220,The display is a little bigger than 220,The wide angle is also a little larger than 220,**Cheaper than 220About 300,Personally, I think the cost performance is significantly higher than 220,I read Jingdong、**The evaluation of many netizens,It's really good。

It is recommended that the landlord must go to the store to try the real machine before making a move, and whether he likes it or not only knows after he has used it.

Don't talk about the rest.,Buy Sony.,Just buy a 2000-3000.,W220That's a low-end machine.,I originally bought W220.,Later, I went to the store to take a look.,After turning on the phone, it's completely a little bit.,Completely disappointed.。 I don't say what brand is good, so you don't say I'm trusting, I later bought others, if you don't believe it, you go to the store to see the w220, and then look at other brands at the same price, you know by comparison. The real W220 is not at all.

Sony's good, good thing is that it is equipped with optical image stabilization, and it is a Carl Zeiss lens, which is very good to rent the old hard match.

Fuji's has no optical anti-cheating, but ** within a thousand, very socks attract.

To image quality, f60.

Its CCD is one level higher than the other three, and the picture quality is not on the same level.

To look, ixus 95

The metal case is small and beautiful, and the automatic scene is easy to use.

The J250 is a bit stronger than the IXUS 95 wide-angle end, and those who need a wide angle can also consider it.

The Sony W series doesn't need to be considered, the quality is poor, and there is nothing special about the performance.

Fujifilm F200EXR Why not consider this. It's quite affordable.

The Canon ixsu95 is the better of the best.

Sony W220Don't buy it,You'll regret it if you buy it,The imaging quality is extremely poor,Especially the close focus and night scene,There will be red light leakage in the room against the window。。。 Personally, I recommend that you buy Canon. I regretted the shirt I bought the next day, but it's a pity that Suning didn't return.

I haven't used other brands, the two I mentioned are the 220 I used myself, and the 95 bought by a friend, and we bought them together.

We also checked a lot of information, asked a lot of people, plus the appearance they liked, we chose these two, the earliest 1 year ago used Canon, the feel is great.

The Canon 95 and Sony W220 have similar features, which are enough for non-professionals. Go to Zhongguancun**You can find the detailed parameters and prices of many cameras. This is the difference between my own use and feeling:

There is a viewfinder, the 220 does not.

The feel is better, 220 is average.

The pixels are a little less than 220.

Yes, you can casually upload songs to the camera and listen to ** while checking photos with slides, 95 no.

The memory card can be universal, 220 can only be used with Sony memory stick, not universal.

has less optical zoom than 220 and more digital zoom.

A little less powerful than the 220.

You can zoom when recording, but the 220 cannot.

Each has its own characteristics, see for yourself! My friends and I think it's good to use. I use 220,Sony has a good software in the optical drive.,It's to view photos,**,Modify,I'm learning.,I haven't finished learning.,It's very powerful.。

Select the camera, I personally think the following parameters should be focused:

1. Image sensor.

2. Choose a big brand, there is a guarantee.

3. Anti-shake. 4. Ability to continue.

5. Appearance. 6. Shell material.

If the effect of the photo is not good, I don't think it's a camera problem, I have tried, my camera takes the same scene, two people take photos separately, the effect of the photo is different, because the mode used is different, it is not that you don't have to ask anything about the automatic camera, you still have to choose the mode yourself, there are certain skills in this.

Recommended Fujifilm F60FD, 12 million pixels, with optical image stabilization, most of the manual functions (used to learn photography A file and S file), 1-inch large CCD sensor, 3-inch large screen, The image quality is the best at this price, excellent in high sensitivity (indoor or dark night scenes), and the shape is light, the market price is about 1350 yuan, the cost performance is very high, highly recommended Fujifilm F60FD

The Fujifilm F200 is much taller than the Sony W220, and they are fundamentally two different grades.

In terms of image quality, F200 is a 1-inch large CCD, W220 is a 1 small CCD, but not counting EXR high ISO low noise and super dynamic mode, F200 is also a lot higher than Sony.

Functionally, the Fujifilm F200 has a manual function, while the Sony does not. Fujifilm has a 28mm wide angle and 5x optical zoom, while the Sony has only 4x and a wide angle of only 30mm

In terms of quality, the Sony W series is known for its poor quality and high repair rate. Fuji has an excellent reputation for quality.

The only advantage of the W220 is that it is slightly smaller.

With Fuji F200 currently 1900 yuan**,W220 can only be considered cost-effective if it drops below 1,000 yuan.

Replies to additional questions:

I don't know where and what kind of people are reporting those problems. I don't think it's "them", and I don't think there will be "a lot of people".

Obviously, people who say that they have such problems are laymen who don't understand anything.

If the F200 is too noisy in a poorly lit place, then there is no DC in the world with a small noise.

The problem of distortion in wide-angle shooting is as long as it is a camera. This is an inevitable phenomenon of close-up imaging.

There are two such problems, and I can imagine what happened to the battery problem he reflected.

Take Sony and Fuji by comparison? Not a notch of things.

The CCD of the F60 is higher than that of the Lead Filial Piety Sony Huai Shed Manuscript W220.

Fujifilm F60 has better picture quality Sony W series is not as good as Fujifilm in terms of image stabilization and ** color.

Fujifilm F60 is a very good machine, if the budget is sufficient, you can also consider the Fujifilm F200 is higher than the Fujifilm F60.

Buy Z300 now! I just bought it with my own pocket money!

Hehe··· It's beautiful ·· Suitable for girls who are not professional...

Sony T series is too expensive... I wanted to buy it before, but I couldn't afford it... Fuji's Z series is very girly...

Fujifilm should be the first choice, followed by Panasonic, then Nikon, don't want Sony, garbage. After-sales is also a big bully in the store.

It's not good, I like that to buy beautiful consider Sony T series, such as T900 TX1

The W220 is a low-end camera, and it's not good to take pictures, and Fujifilm is the same, and the Z series has seen it, but it's not as good as the Sony T series.