Have I sinned any of the following?

1: It's not a crime. You are not a person who has a legal obligation to provide specific assistance. This can only be a matter of morality.

2: It's an accident. You are not subjectively at fault.

4: It's not a crime, it's a legitimate act of self-defense, and he's a heart attack.

In both cases, you will definitely be liable for civil damages.

1 Not guilty. 2 It is negligence, i.e., you should have foreseen the outcome of the event but did not foresee it, which is a crime of negligence.

3. If an animal causes the death of a person, you shall be liable for civil compensation. If you were present at the time and did not stop it in time, there may be other liability.

4 Not guilty (this idea is very similar to a question in a certain year's bar exam, and this question is controversial, you can look it up).

1. You should help him call someone, otherwise you may be considered guilty of negligence causing death.

2. You have to look at the specific problems specifically, but you will definitely be pulled into the criminal police team for review, and you will definitely have to bear civil liability.

3. You will definitely be held civilly liable.

4. If the gangster is indeed stealing, you don't have to bear any responsibility.

。。You're in a lot of situations...

1。If you don't save yourself from death, you're not guilty. Of course, if you have a duty of care to the person who fell into the water, you are guilty if you do not save it.

2。It depends, because if you bring him to play and then you don't notice that he steals the apple, it is negligent and guilty; If he rushes over to play on his own, you don't know anything about it, not guilty, because there is no intent and negligence.

3。In the clear. Because you didn't drive him to bite someone to death, you weren't the main offender, so you are not guilty.

4。Not guilty, from the perspective of criminal law, there is no causal relationship between his death and your shouting.

Thirdly, you have to bear civil liability, because the tort of animals is no-fault liability.

The second depends on the situation. You don't know that he came, you don't have to compensate, you know the medicine compensates.

It's not a crime, but if you die, you have to bear civil liability.

No, but this shouldn't have been done by you, and it's better not to happen.

To say that you are guilty is to be guilty, and to say that you are not guilty is not guilty. See if you have the money.

I guess the court will have a hard time! You're really going to think about it.

Answer]:BAnswer】B. Analysis:

Option A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime; Option B is only an indication of criminal intent, which does not constitute an offence; Option C is an act of creating a judgment for the purpose of stealing, which constitutes a preparation for a crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery, and it also constitutes a preparation for a crime.

Answer]:BAnswer】B. Take the analysis before:

Option A is an act of creating a bundle of repentance for the purpose of robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option B is only an expression of intent and does not constitute a crime: option C is an act of infiltrating ants for the purpose of creating conditions for theft, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery and also constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime.

Answer]:BAnswer】B. Analysis: Option A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; The selection of Infiltration Ant B is only an expression of criminal intent and does not constitute a crime;

Option C is an act of taking the conditions for the creation of the theft for Cong to repent, which constitutes preparation for the crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery and also constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime.

Answer]:BAnswer】B. Analysis:

Option A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime; Option B is only an indication of criminal intent, which does not constitute an offence; Option C is an act of creating a judgment for the purpose of stealing, which constitutes a preparation for a crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery, and it also constitutes a preparation for a crime.

Answer]: Option B A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option B is only an expression of intent and does not constitute a crime: option C is an act of creating conditions for the theft of the hand, which constitutes preparation for the crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery, and it also constitutes preparation for a crime.

Answer]: Option B A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option B is only an expression of intent and does not constitute a nuclear offense: option C is an act of creating conditions for theft, which constitutes preparation for the crime; Option D is an act of making a piece for the purpose of robbery, which also constitutes a crime of pre-emption.

Answer]: Item ba is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; subparagraph b is merely an expression of intent and does not constitute an offence; Item C belongs to the act of making a simple and frank concession for the purpose of stealing, which constitutes a preparation for a crime; Item (d) is an act of barricade for the purpose of creating conditions for robbery, which also constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime. Therefore, choose B.