-
1: It's not a crime. You are not a person who has a legal obligation to provide specific assistance. This can only be a matter of morality.
2: It's an accident. You are not subjectively at fault.
4: It's not a crime, it's a legitimate act of self-defense, and he's a heart attack.
-
In both cases, you will definitely be liable for civil damages.
-
1 Not guilty. 2 It is negligence, i.e., you should have foreseen the outcome of the event but did not foresee it, which is a crime of negligence.
3. If an animal causes the death of a person, you shall be liable for civil compensation. If you were present at the time and did not stop it in time, there may be other liability.
4 Not guilty (this idea is very similar to a question in a certain year's bar exam, and this question is controversial, you can look it up).
-
1. You should help him call someone, otherwise you may be considered guilty of negligence causing death.
2. You have to look at the specific problems specifically, but you will definitely be pulled into the criminal police team for review, and you will definitely have to bear civil liability.
3. You will definitely be held civilly liable.
4. If the gangster is indeed stealing, you don't have to bear any responsibility.
-
。。You're in a lot of situations...
1。If you don't save yourself from death, you're not guilty. Of course, if you have a duty of care to the person who fell into the water, you are guilty if you do not save it.
2。It depends, because if you bring him to play and then you don't notice that he steals the apple, it is negligent and guilty; If he rushes over to play on his own, you don't know anything about it, not guilty, because there is no intent and negligence.
3。In the clear. Because you didn't drive him to bite someone to death, you weren't the main offender, so you are not guilty.
4。Not guilty, from the perspective of criminal law, there is no causal relationship between his death and your shouting.
Thirdly, you have to bear civil liability, because the tort of animals is no-fault liability.
The second depends on the situation. You don't know that he came, you don't have to compensate, you know the medicine compensates.
-
It's not a crime, but if you die, you have to bear civil liability.
-
No, but this shouldn't have been done by you, and it's better not to happen.
-
To say that you are guilty is to be guilty, and to say that you are not guilty is not guilty. See if you have the money.
-
I guess the court will have a hard time! You're really going to think about it.
-
Answer]:BAnswer】B. Analysis:
Option A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime; Option B is only an indication of criminal intent, which does not constitute an offence; Option C is an act of creating a judgment for the purpose of stealing, which constitutes a preparation for a crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery, and it also constitutes a preparation for a crime.
-
Answer]:BAnswer】B. Take the analysis before:
Option A is an act of creating a bundle of repentance for the purpose of robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option B is only an expression of intent and does not constitute a crime: option C is an act of infiltrating ants for the purpose of creating conditions for theft, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery and also constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime.
-
Answer]:BAnswer】B. Analysis: Option A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; The selection of Infiltration Ant B is only an expression of criminal intent and does not constitute a crime;
Option C is an act of taking the conditions for the creation of the theft for Cong to repent, which constitutes preparation for the crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery and also constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime.
-
Answer]:BAnswer】B. Analysis:
Option A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime; Option B is only an indication of criminal intent, which does not constitute an offence; Option C is an act of creating a judgment for the purpose of stealing, which constitutes a preparation for a crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery, and it also constitutes a preparation for a crime.
-
Answer]: Option B A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option B is only an expression of intent and does not constitute a crime: option C is an act of creating conditions for the theft of the hand, which constitutes preparation for the crime; Option D is an act of creating conditions for robbery, and it also constitutes preparation for a crime.
-
Answer]: Option B A is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; Option B is only an expression of intent and does not constitute a nuclear offense: option C is an act of creating conditions for theft, which constitutes preparation for the crime; Option D is an act of making a piece for the purpose of robbery, which also constitutes a crime of pre-emption.
-
Answer]: Item ba is an act of creating conditions for robbery, which constitutes preparation for a crime; subparagraph b is merely an expression of intent and does not constitute an offence; Item C belongs to the act of making a simple and frank concession for the purpose of stealing, which constitutes a preparation for a crime; Item (d) is an act of barricade for the purpose of creating conditions for robbery, which also constitutes preparation for the commission of a crime. Therefore, choose B.
Chinese patent specifications published before 1993 are:Invention patentsApplication Instructions Bury Pants Book A. >>>More
It may affect. Even if the parents are divorced, both parents need to be reviewed politically when the child is in political trial. Because the main content of the political trial is the political situation of the immediate family and the main social relations close to the person, and the relationship between parents and children is not eliminated by the dissolution of the relationship between husband and wife, after divorce, the children are still the children of both parents, regardless of whether they are directly raised by the father or the mother. >>>More
OK. Article 38 of the Labor Contract Law provides that if an employee unilaterally terminates a labor contract, the employer may terminate the labor contract under any of the following circumstances: (1) the employee fails to provide labor protection or working conditions in accordance with the labor contract; (2) Failure to pay labor remuneration in full and in a timely manner; (3) Failing to pay social insurance premiums for workers in accordance with law; (4) The rules and regulations of the employer violate the provisions of laws and regulations and harm the rights and interests of workers; (5) The labor contract is invalid due to the circumstances provided for in the first paragraph of Article 26 of this Law; (6) Other circumstances in which the labor contract may be terminated as provided by laws and administrative regulations. >>>More
If it is controlled, there will certainly be no detention after the judgment takes effect; In the case of criminal detention, you will definitely be detained in a detention facility after the sentence takes effect. So it's actually very easy to judge, and in layman's terms, it depends on whether the person is locked up or released. >>>More
Immortal King Ah Fei Xiucai Level 2 (134) |My question |My |My Message (10 14) |Personal Center |Exit Information Web Page Paste Bar Know *** ** Encyclopedia Help. >>>More