I ll buy a SLR first, and ask the comrades to give some suggestions, which is both economical and ea

1.The landlord said how much the economy is in the budget.

Around 5000 recommendations for the Canon 550d 600d set. Or the Nikon D5100 (which doesn't sell as well as the 550D, but it is not excluded that some people don't like the sound of the Canon shutter.) )

Around 5000-7000 recommended D90 is super cost-effective.

2.The landlord likes to use or fashion.

3.It is recommended that the landlord first go to the store to play all the SLRs that are considered, and then consider it as appropriate.

Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax.

Cheap and easy to use, or buy Sony's A390 set of 3000+

Or Pentax K-R

If you are an entry-level person, it is recommended to use the Canon 550D with an 18-135 lens and a prime head (I forgot the model, you can consult the salesperson). You can ask the people around you.

I think it's cheaper, or Fuji's good, the lens is generally from the factory, ** is generally cheaper than the same grade, although Canon's warm color is the world's first, but Fuji's cold color is also the world's first, Canon's is too expensive, Fuji's is enough, the camera is fast.

Because I have also bought a camera, I recommend it to the point.

Pentax kr bar is more cost-effective.

Depending on the budget, there can be several options.

5,000: Canon 600D set, Nikon D5100 set.

8,000: Canon 60D set, Nikon D7000 set.

1. If you are not obsessed with photography or are willing to study it deeply, it is recommended not to buy a DSLR. If it is just to get a relatively good picture quality, it is recommended to use a mirrorless mirror;

2. SLR is heavy, large, inconvenient to carry, and complicated to use. For mirrorless mirrors, the advantages of SLRs are now wide-angle edge image quality and optical SLR viewfinders (this is a matter of opinion). Wide-angle edge image quality benefits from a relatively large flange distance, resulting in relatively perpendicular light ingestion to CMOS.

It's all about choosing shots. Funding should be within your means. The low-end selection surface is the largest, and ** will not be too biting, the set of cameras can meet some shooting needs, the function is not lacking at all, the price is cheap, why not.

Nikon's D60 and D80, Canon's 450D and 1000D, are all good options. They are very easy to operate, the buttons are clear at a glance, and there is such a machine that can be upgraded in the future. In terms of lenses, there are many options to choose from, from wide-angle to telephoto, everything, one thing I have to remind you is not to buy a lens with a large zoom ratio that goes all over the world, if you want this kind of lens, some people are still rushing to buy a large-aperture prime head to do.

The focal length of the lens from 17 to 300 is complete, but because it is a non-full-frame sensor, the actual focal length is between 24 and 400, which is basically at the wide-angle and ultra-telephoto ends. I thought that when shooting landscape films, a large wide angle must be missing, it doesn't matter with or without stabilization, a large wide angle, a large depth of field, and the scenery will definitely not be spent.

If you want to upgrade to full frame, I recommend buying the mid-range as soon as you come up. If you want to upgrade, you need to save some money, you can't invest repeatedly in the lens, you want to go professional, in order to match the full-frame DSLR camera that will be upgraded in the future. Full-frame DSLRs are the ultimate goal for photography enthusiasts.

The mid-range cameras are mainly Canon and 40D and 50D, Nikon D300 and D90. This type of camera is very well worked, and the parameters are close to the top machines. **If it is appropriate, you must shoot when you should shoot for the mid-range machine, otherwise you will regret it for a lifetime.

Nikon's professional head is uneven and expensive. Nikon's full-width D700 is very good, and the parameters are in place. Nikon's biggest weakness is that the sensor chip is provided by Sony, so there is nothing new in the pixel upgrade, the top D3 and D700 share a chip, and the mid-range D300 shares a chip with the new D90.

However, Nikon's internal skills are well cultivated, and the high-sensitivity noise reduction is almost perfect. Canon is better at taking care of professional lenses, and there are also high and low differences, if you enter Canon, you will enter the professional red circle. If you upgrade, Canon is also a better balance, especially 5D and the new "Invincible Rabbit".

With so many introductions, the key is to choose by yourself, just like wearing shoes, it depends on you whether it fits or not.